Aggregatore di feed

As I have long maintained, the systems that modern-day Americans have embraced have served to produce a very dysfunctional society. The best manifestation of this dysfunction are the suicides of young people. When youngsters are checking out of life early, that’s a powerful sign that something fundamental is wrong.

There is also the fact that America is a drug-addled society, which is reflected by the fact that the U.S. government still has to maintain a vicious, nationwide drug-war police state. The government’s drug war is designed to prevent an estimated 70 million Americans from getting their hands on drugs and ingesting them. When around 25% of a society are checking out of reality in favor of drug fantasies, that’s a fairly good sign of a highly dysfunctional society.

But I have also long contended that another demonstration of the dysfunctional nature of American society are the irrational mass killings that periodically take place in our society. Yesterday, people in New York City experienced another one of these irrational killings. A guy entered a NYC high-rise with a high-powered rifle and killed four people and then killed himself.

It’s not just guns. Last week, a guy at a Walmart in Michigan went on a knife-stabbing spree in which he injured 11 people. Seven are in fair condition and four are in serious condition. There was no apparent motive for the attack.

Here is what I have long contended:

In every society, there are off-kilter people. In a healthy, functional society those off-kilter people don’t bother anyone. Everyone can see that they are off-kilter but most everyone displays tolerance, kindness, and consideration for them. “There but for the grace of God go I.”

But a healthy, functional society is obviously not the type of society in which we live. We live in a society where the government tightly controls, manages, regulates, and directs people’s lives and the use of their resources. In the process of doing that, the state, decade after decade, has engaged in a continuous process of tightening its screws on the American people.

It is my contention that this tightening of the screws causes something to go haywire within the off-kilter people. That’s when they go off and engage in their irrational killing sprees.

I’ve already mentioned the drug war, a vicious government program that has involved decades of screw-tightening on the American people with things like no-knock raids, asset forfeiture, mandatory minimum sentences, violent arrests, and humiliating pat-down searches.

There is also the U.S. national-security establishment’s own killing sprees in overseas countries, ones that have resulted in the deaths and injuries of millions of foreigners. The official attitude has always been that Americans need not fret about the fact that their government is killing so many people. So long as large numbers of U.S. soldiers aren’t dying, Americans are expected to focus their attention on their families, work, and vacation. I contend that those killing sprees — invasions, sanctions, embargoes, wars of aggressions, coups, provoking wars — trigger something in the off-kilter people that causes them to engage in copycat killing sprees here at home.

There is also the welfare state, where large numbers of Americans use the IRS to seize as much as possible of the income of other people, including their children, while, at the same time, everyone is using deductions and other tax devices to protect their income from being plundered. It is a system in which Americans are waging war against each other while acting normal and friendly to each other, especially in church on Sunday.

There is also the regulated society, which consists of an ever-growing array of rules, regulations, licenses, controls, orders, and directions, all of which add to the tightening of the government’s screws.

There is also the decades-old immigration police state that is now expanding beyond the borderlands into cities and towns across the country. With its brutal, vicious, and frightening arrests, kidnappings, incarcerations, and deportations, the government is now tightening the screws even more on both foreigners and the Americans who are hiring them, selling to them, and renting to them. Is it just a coincidence that the two irrational killings sprees in New York and Michigan have occurred in the midst of the reign of terror that Homeland Security, ICE, and the Border Patrol are inflicting across the country?

The worst part of America’s dysfunctional society is that so many Americans have been taught that the systems they have adopted are normal and healthy and, in fact, that they constitute “freedom.” I’d be willing to bet that if a survey were taken, at least 90 percent of Americans would respond, “Well, of course we live in a free society. We are Americans.” They have no idea that they embody perfectly the words of Johann Goethe: “None are more hopelessly enslaved that those who falsely believe they are free.”

One problem is that Americans acquired this false mindset of “freedom” in the public (i.e., government) schools to which their parents were forced to send them. The state’s educational system, of course, constitutes more tightening of the screws. Another problem is that that when people deny reality, it compounds the problem because a denial of reality leads to psychosis.

In our public (i.e., government) schools, students are inculcated with the notion that Americans who lived in the Gilded Age were bad people because of the systems they adopted. Americans in the late 1800s hated and rejected everything Americans today stand for and favor. That’s why there was no income taxation, IRS, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, welfare, welfare state, economic regulations, minimum wage laws, drug laws, war on immigrants, paper money, Federal Reserve, occupational licensure, national-security state, Pentagon, CIA, NSA, FBI, coups, state-sponsored assassinations, torture, and other such things that today’s Americans love and adore.

Ironically, those Americans also believed they lived in a free society, just as Americans today do who live under completely opposite systems. It’s probably worth mentioning that Gilded Age Americans lived in the most prosperous, most charitable, healthiest, end most educated society in history up to that time.

Interestingly enough, Gilded Age Americans did not live in a society that was besieged by irrational mass killings. Maybe that’s just a coincidence. Or maybe it’s because they refused to adopt systems that would permit the state to tighten its screws on them.

Reprinted with permission from The Future of Freedom Foundation.

The post More Irrational Attacks in Our Dysfunctional Society appeared first on LewRockwell.

We’ve noted the tendency of insufferable busybodies to make, magnify, or invent messes… and then “solve” those problems by making them worse.

In doing so, the do-gooders enhance their status, inflate their finances, and divert attention from more serious shenanigans happening off-stage. Today we retract the curtain, and shine a light on the prime protagonist of most public pathologies.

Paw Prints

CS Lewis considered Pride the worst of the deadly sins, because it was the source and stimulus of all the others. Among government institutions, the same can be said of the Federal Reserve.

We know the Fed isn’t technically a government agency. Officially, it’s a State-sanctioned “private” cartel whose governors happen to be appointed by the President, approved by Congress, and serve at the behest of big banks.

“The Creature from Jekyll Island” was constructed a century ago at a clandestine conclave off the coast of Georgia, to which top-tier Senators, Wall Street barons, and captains of industry traveled under assumed names.

By the time they‘d settled into their dining cars for the return trip north, the foundational concrete had been poured. The meeting was secret, but the fat cats left enough paw prints in the cement to let us know who was there, and what they did.

Using the Panic of 1907 as a handy excuse to erect an edifice they’d long wanted to build, these luminaries gathered to ensure that “the system” would never again be compromised by the irresponsible acts of a few bad banks.

Instead, from then on they’d all be in on the scam! Their new “lender of last resort” would serve as a controlled croupier, dealing financial favors from the bottom of the deck.

No longer would a few rogue banks over-extend themselves atop the inverted pyramid of diminishing reserves. Now, every bank would do so. And the process would be carefully coordinated by a new captain, steering a hull that hauls its own icebergs.

Sophisticated Consigliere

The government, as comedian Dave Smith put it, is the mafia masquerading as a human rights organization. The IRS is its street-corner muscle, the brass knuckles that instills fear to empty pockets.

The Fed is a more sophisticated consigliere. It operates behind the scenes, surreptitiously fleecing the flock to fund the racket.

Whereas the IRS storms the cellar and steals the wine, the Fed slowly dilutes it. But only after pouring the Château Margaux into the glittering goblets of its connected cronies. The general public gets the remaining rotgut. While the Big Shots catch a buzz, the hoi polloi suffer the hangover.

It is this counterfeit cocktail that numbs average Americans while ripping them off. By taking our money to keep our booze, the central bank bartender siphons funds from the outsiders to the insiders, Main Street to the Deep State, the makers to the takers. This home-made hooch “pays for” the wars, bail-outs, stimulus checks, pay-offs, annual bonuses, and big boats that keep the grift afloat.

By counterfeiting currency to buy “assets“ and monkey with rates, the Fed distorts the structure of production, jams price signals, precipitates cyclical booms, and necessitates painful busts. The Great Depression, the stagflation of the 1970s, the dot-com bust, the 2008 meltdown, and the “everything bubble” that’s starting to leak were all consequences of monetary malfeasance.

Transparent Marbles

But funny money also enables colossal crises that otherwise couldn’t occur. The First World War…and the incessant conflicts and carnage it bequeathed the subsequent century…would have been impossible, or severely constrained, without a steady infusion of counterfeit cash.

Like transparent marbles across a ballroom floor, each injection of phony money becomes a hidden catalyst for a new calamity. It isn’t only the dogs of war that it loosed from their leash. Fake money freed a litter of ravenous hounds, that have grown into embedded institutions that get hungrier as they eat.

As with any counterfeiting racket, the beneficiaries of the fraud are those who first receive the funds. With their conjured cash, they compete with unsuspecting suckers for an unchanged quantity of desirable goods.

Without creating real resources, the initial recipients use this new “money” to pilfer wealth. By the time the sham cash reaches later recipients, its intrinsic value has become apparent. Prices have risen, goods are gone, and the masses are left holding the bag.

Trunk of the Vine

But where did its contents go? After World War II, and particularly since the 1960s, government money fertilized a thicket of connected industries that grew like weeds.

Their growth was initially inhibited by the herbicide of gold. But since that constraint was removed in 1971, these crony rackets have covered the country like kudzu over Georgia. They spread in every direction, but the trunk of the vine is the financial services sector.

Loans are the coin of the realm in a debt-based system. Using monetarist pixie dust, the central bank conjures cash from thin air to buy government debt. When the Fed lowers rates or reduces reserves, it entices banks to create money by extending loans.

This river of money soon flows to and from its fertile banks. It overflows them as liquidity rises, to nourish the industries, boondoggles, bamboozles, and scams that crave the wave.

For half a century prices have risen on an ocean of debt. Among those washed while we get cleaned are the Educational, Pharmaceutical, Military, and Medical complexes that soak us today.

The catalogue of carnage governments committed couldn’t have been published without clipped coins, debased money, or counterfeit currency. Neither World War, nor most martial misadventures since, would have been possible without a Niagara of ink from the Federal Reserve.

Whenever there’s a question, the answer is always more “money”. A respiratory virus? Fire up the presses. “Supply chain” disruptions? Need more “liquidity”. Rambunctious Russkies? Create more “cash”.

Much as our wise central bankers should remove the punch bowl and take the keys, some wiseacre always orders another round and puts a new song on the jukebox. No matter what happens, the Fed is at the wheel…pressing pedal to the medal, and careening toward a cliff.

And its fated to fall from a deepening hole. US government debt recently crested $37,000B.

That’s billion, with a “T”.

At the turn of this century, the tab was “only” $6T. Ten years later, after launching two idiotic wars and bailing out its wealthiest benefactors, the feds owed $14T.

They had so much fun doubling the debt in a decade that they decided to do it again. When 2020 ended, they were $28T in hock. Half a decade later, they’re closing in on forty. According to the Institute for International Finance, worldwide debt is about $325 Trillion – more than three times global GDP.

But that was five months ago. Who knows what heights they’ve ascended since? As noses bleed and heads spin, creditors wait anxiously at the base camp.

They have to know that if their money comes down, it’ll be a skeletal remnant of the flesh that went up. It’s wandering aimlessly in the thin air of uncharted territory. The scouts and sherpas to whom it’s entrusted are unreliable guides. How were the able to climb so high?

Read the Whole Article

The post Everybody’s Problem appeared first on LewRockwell.

Today marks the feast of St. Ignatius of Loyola—soldier, mystic, founder of the Society of Jesus. Once, this name commanded respect from Catholics worldwide. Today, it often evokes embarrassment among the faithful who witness some of his spiritual sons betraying everything he fought to defend.

Yet, Ignatius was a warrior—literally. A cannonball shattered his leg at Pamplona, thus transforming a worldly knight into Christ’s most disciplined general.

His Jesuits were the face of the Church Militant—soldiers trained for spiritual warfare, organized with military precision, devoted to one sacred motto: Ad majórem Dei glóriam (“For the greater glory of God”). They spearheaded the Counter-Reformation, building an empire of souls that stretched from European universities to Asia and the New World.

What would this authentic warrior make of his order’s pseudo-celebrities today? Men like James Martin masquerade online as shepherds while leading the flock toward perdition. Fr. Martin, a modernist, represents everything St. Pius X condemned in his encyclical Pascendi Dominici gregis (1907), when he called modernism the “synthesis of all heresies,” seeking to marry Catholic truth with atheistic rationalism.

This atheistic cocktail is a favorite libation of the modernists—a poisonous blend of faith and false philosophy, creating a pseudo-Christianity devoid of supernatural truth. Modernists like Martin present themselves as defenders of the faith but systematically undermine its foundations.

They craft a “rational Christianity” stripped of miracles, moral absolutes, and divine authority. This is precisely what Pius X warned would destroy the Church from within.

These are the “false prophets who come to you in the clothing of sheep, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. By their fruits you shall know them.” Christ’s words are indeed prophetic.

Every day on social media, one will witness Martin and his ilk using their clerical collars to advance agendas that contradict two millennia of Catholic teaching. They exploit their position as shepherds to scatter the flock instead of protecting it.

The contrast could not be more stark. Ignatius was a devoted soldier of the Church Militant—Christians on earth engaged in spiritual warfare against sin and error. Martin represents the Church Submissive, an institution that genuflects before contemporary culture rather than challenging it with eternal truth.

Where Ignatius demanded discipline and obedience to Church teaching, Martin promotes “dialogue” with a chaser of disorder. Where the Basque saint built institutions to defend Catholic doctrine, his supposed spiritual son builds bridges to relativism.

Reflect. This betrayal would have horrified the man who wrote the Spiritual Exercises, whose mission was to train souls for authentic spiritual combat.

Traditional Catholics recognize the battle lines. On one side stands the authentic Church—militant, uncompromising, faithful to Christ’s teachings. On the other? The modernist counterfeit, submissive to worldly opinion, eager to accommodate error, and desperate for secular approval.

Consider asking St. Ignatius for his intercession. Pray for his Society’s return to orthodoxy. The cancer of modernism has metastasized, but Christ’s promise to the Church remains: “the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”

The faithful remnant will rebuild what these wolves have attempted to destroy.

This article was originally published on The O’Leary Review.

The post From Militant Saints to Modernist Wolves appeared first on LewRockwell.

When you study history, it’s always striking how frequently dysfunctional cycles tend to repeat themselves—which is why many of us were able to foresee much of what came to pass with the disastrous COVID-19 vaccines. Medicine has its fair share of erroneous beliefs (which frequently have little to no evidence supporting them). Sadly, my profession has held tightly onto them for centuries regardless of the problems those beliefs create and I believe the vaccination meme is one of the most harmful ones.

As all of this began with the smallpox vaccines which “ended” the scourge of smallpox, I believe it’s critical to review exactly what actually happened as:

• The mythology of the smallpox vaccines has served as the justification for all the other vaccination atrocities which followed.

• Many issues emerged during that campaign (resulting in immense public backlash) which are almost identical to what we’ve seen again and again since then (including throughout COVID-19). As such, to break this dysfunctional cycle which has consumed our culture, it is critical to understand what’s actually happened.

• I believe the smallpox vaccines served as an inflection point in humanity’s health, as after them, an era of chronic illness (particularly autoimmune and neurologic ones) began which has continued to increase ever since. In fact, many of the unusual complications of the COVID-19 vaccines are very similar to what was observed from the smallpox vaccine over a century ago.

The Vaccine Positive Feedback Cycle

Edward Jenner is credited with having the insight milk maids exposed to cowpox never caught smallpox, and hence that smallpox could be prevented with a survivable cowpox infection. In truth, this was a longstanding folk belief the medical community had rejected (as cowpox often failed to prevent smallpox), and over the years, many came forward attesting that Jenner was a charlatan who continually changed his positions to protect his grift (detailed here).

As such, when the smallpox vaccine created in 1796, it was met with widespread skepticism by the medical profession initially because it had almost no supporting data and because it simply didn’t work. Nonetheless, governments around the world rapidly adopted it because it provided a simple top-down solution (something government always prefers) for smallpox and the medical profession gradually got behind it because of both the political power and money they received from the vaccinations.

Many doctors still spoke out against the vaccine, with many providing robust data to support their objections (e.g., large cohorts showed the vaccine did not prevent smallpox and erysipelas, an agonizing and sometimes fatal skin infection, was commonly observed in vaccinated individuals). Sadly, these dissident doctors became a smaller and smaller minority and reports exist from the time of doctors in the early hospitals falsifying medical records in order to conceal the vaccine’s dangers and its ineffectiveness in preventing smallpox (something which has since happened with many other vaccines for the sake of “public health”).

However, the largest problems with the smallpox vaccine was that vaccination tended to increase rather than decrease the occurrence of smallpox.

Note: many other examples of increasing vaccination increasing smallpox outbreaks can be found here.

When this happened, governments tended to respond to that emergency by viewing it as a result of not enough people being vaccinated and doing what they could to increase vaccination rates. Since the working class was well aware of both the dangers of the smallpox vaccine and its ineffectiveness, harsher and harsher mandates needed to be implemented to continue meeting the vaccination quotas.

As things continued to escalate, assaults on officers enforcing vaccination occurred, and riots periodically broke out.  This 1874 quote from Emeritus Professor F. W. Newman encapsulates the mood of the time:

“Decorous and admissible language fails me, in alluding to that which might have seemed incredible thirty years ago—the commanding of vaccination on a second child of a family, when vaccination has killed the first; and then sending the father to prison for refusal.”

Note: to address the widespread failures of their vaccine, the medical profession moved their goal-posts from the vaccine providing a lifelong “perfect” immunity to simply ensuring a “milder disease,” a playbook that persists to this day and (e.g., it was used for the COVID-19 vaccines).

At the same time increasingly draconian mandates were being enacted, many early activists argued that smallpox and many other infectious diseases were primarily due to the common people living in absolute squalor (it’s hard to even begin to describe just how bad their living conditions were—particularly for children). After decades of work, activists were able to improve the basic living conditions of the working class (e.g., through public sanitation so people no longer slept next to infectious microbes) and a massive benefit was seen in the reduction of deaths from all infectious diseases:

Note: this chart and many others like can be viewed at dissolvingillusions.com.

The medical profession however coopted the activist’s work and claimed the reduction in deaths was due to the introduction of vaccination, something not at all supported by the data (e.g., scarlet fever, the biggest killer of the era but now an almost entirely forgotten condition never had a vaccination developed for it). Since this time, the belief that medicine rescued us from the dark ages of infectious illness and that all infections can be prevented with a vaccination has become one of the central mythologies the practice modern medicine is founded upon.

Note: I call all of this a positive feedback cycle because normally when something doesn’t work (e.g., in the body) a signal activates to stop it (known as negative feedback). Positive feedback systems are much rarer (as they are inherently unstable), but due to our society’s faith in vaccination, one exists here.

In response to the increasingly draconian vaccination mandates, a massive protest (attended by citizens across Europe) broke out in Leicester (England) in 1885 which resulted in Leicester’s mandatory vaccination laws being repealed and replaced with measures to both improve public sanitation and quarantine both individuals with smallpox (along with their sick contacts). When this approach was proposed by Leicester, the medical profession attacked the citizens of Leicester, loudly proclaimed their policy would result in mass deaths and stated Leicester would serve as a lesson to the world to never to abandon vaccination. The opposite instead happen, Leicester conquered smallpox, and their methods (often done it tandem with vaccination) were then copied, allowing us to at last eliminate smallpox.

As you might have noticed, there are many, many parallels between those events from over a century ago and what we all witnessed over the last few years.

Note: a more detailed summary of Jenner’s fraudulent behavior along with additional documented failures of the smallpox vaccine can be found here.

Early Schools of American Medicine

In the early 1900s, there were four main schools of medicine in the United States—Allopathy (conventional medicine), Homeopathy, Naturopathy (call the eclectic school at the time) and Osteopathy. Allopathy was losing favor because its treatments often didn’t work and were highly toxic.

At the same time, two of the richest individuals in history (Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller) realized they would need to diversify beyond their respective industries (steel and oil) after Theodore Roosevelt decided to break up their monopolies. Allopathic medicine was identified as a promising way to make a lot of money and a variety of investments were made to cause Allopathy to go from falling out of favor to it becoming the leading form of medicine within the United States (e.g., the Flexner report, published in 1910 was used to close most of America’s competing non-allopathic medical schools). Because of this, Allopathic medicine became “medicine” and the term “Allopathy” became extinct. In turn, while Allopathic medicine has greatly improved from that time, it still retains many of the same foundation issues Allopathy had, and hence routinely injures patients or fails to cure their illnesses.

Note: The Robber Barons, which details exactly how Rockefeller went about monopolizing the oil industry, provides an insightful perspective on what he appears to have also done with the medical industry.

Since the monopolization of American medicine, Allopathy has had the remarkable accomplishment of always costing the country more each year than it did the year before while simultaneously abjectly failing to address many of the major health issues facing our country—we spend more than the rest of the world on healthcare but our national healthcare outcomes are worse than almost all of the developed world.

Most of the non-allopathic schools of medicine at the time were strongly opposed to vaccination because of the harms they saw it create. Sadly, in order to gain acceptance within the lucrative medical industry, one by one, they wholeheartedly adopted the vaccination narrative. For example, Bastyr, the premier Naturopathic medical school in the United States mandated the COVID-19 vaccine for its students, a move which was met with disgust by many of the more traditional Naturopathic Physicians in practice as that mandate went against everything Naturopathy had stood for. Likewise, the Osteopathic profession fully supported and frequently advocated for them.

In researching this series, I thus explored what each of those early schools of medicine had reported at the time, as their early literature was much more willing to criticize the sacred cow of vaccination. It’s worth noting all of them were describing similar events that differed primarily due to the unique lens their model of medicine saw the body through.

Note: With what follows, I would have also liked to have included the Ayurvedic perspective (e.g., Ghandi strongly opposed vaccination) and what was seen in Japan (the Japanese suffered immensely from the smallpox vaccinations). Unfortunately, I could not locate a good reference for any of these.

Homeopathy:

Within Homeopathy, an idea exists known as Hering’s Law of Cure.  It posits that diseases enter the body superficially, and then can either be expelled at the surface (e.g., through the skin), or travel deep into the body.  When the disease stays at the surface, acute reactions such as skin eruptions and fevers occur, while when allowed to instead travel into the patient, a variety of chronic debilitating diseases are likely to occur. Likewise, the mind and spirit are considered “deeper” than emotions, so in many cases, suppressing an emotional issue can create a permanent physical one.

Note: Many opponents of the smallpox vaccines believed it was not a good idea to introduce the vaccine directly into the bloodstream since that allowed the cowpox virus to establish itself deep within the body.

Hering’s Law hence argues that the goal of treatment should be to facilitate the outward expulsion of disease, which contrasts to the (now) prevailing school of Allopathic thought which strives to suppress those symptomatic expulsions.  For example, treating an unpleasant fever accompanying an illness often worsens the long term prognosis of the condition (e.g., debilitating childhood vaccine injuries are often preceded by fevers that were “treated” with Tylenol). Unfortunately, fevers are reflexively medicated by doctors—something that was immensely problematic throughout COVID-19 because of how frequently suppressing a fever worsened the COVID-19’s prognosis (whereas in contrast I frequently find heating up unhappy patients with fevers makes them feel better and clear the illness faster).

One Homeopathic physician of the time, J. Compton Burnett, M.D., in 1884 authored “Vaccination and Its Cure by Thuja, with Remarks on Homeoprophalaxis,” which provides one of the best illustrations of Hering’s Law I have come across.

In his book, Burnet advanced the argument that the medical field had mistaken correlation with causation in the smallpox vaccination programs.  The vaccine was only considered to be effective if it “took” after vaccination, meaning that a large skin eruption emerged at the site of vaccination. In turn, if the vaccinations did not “take” this argued that the vaccine needed to be re-administered, or the individual was not “vaccinated.”

Burnett and others argued that the vaccine “taking” was a sign of the individual having a strong immune system, and that if the immune system was strong enough to “take” the vaccine, it was also already strong enough to repel a smallpox infection and had no need to be vaccinated in the first place.  As he discussed the conflicting perspectives of the pro-vaccinational literature and anti-vaccinational literature (the terminology of being “anti-vaccine” is over a century old), he argued that the pre-existing immunocompetency of the vaccinated individual could explain the divergent observations in mortality by each side of the debate.

Conversely, he found that almost all cases of severe chronic illness following vaccination (termed vaccinosis) occurred in individuals who had had a smallpox vaccine that did not take, and instead moved deeper into the body creating chronic pathology.  One of his strongest arguments for this was his observation that homeopathic Thuja preparations would frequently treat the conditions that he temporally correlated with vaccination.

Note: the issue Burnett and others found appears to be shared by the COVID-19 vaccines. In one recent study (discussed here), teenagers and young adults who developed post-vaccination myocarditis were compared to those who did not. It was discovered that those with myocarditis had free spike protein in the bloodstream their immune systems could not develop neutralizing antibodies to (and likely would not develop from a COVID-19 infection either).

When I learned of this, I recalled that one of the only therapies I had ever seen reported in support groups to work for COVID-19 vaccine injuries were the early monoclonal antibodies developed for combatting the original COVID-19 variants (which used the same spike protein still found in the vaccine). Unfortunately, the Biden administration pulled the “outdated” monoclonal antibodies from the market so they are now almost impossible to get ahold of (whereas they continued to mandate the “outdated” vaccines).

Burnett’s book begins with a description of vaccinosis, and is primary composed of noteworthy vaccinosis cases, some of which I will share.

The diseased state, then, engendered by this vaccinial pus, by vaccination, is vaccinosis; and in it are not included any other diseases whose causes may be accidentally or incidentally contained in the vaccine pus,—such as scrofulosis, syphilis, or tuberculosis.

Note: many others also complained about the consequences of contaminated or improperly produced vaccines.

In my assessment, many of the chronic symptoms Burnett and other physicians reported (particularly the various “neuralgias” repeatedly mentioned) were a consequence of “blood stasis,” a Chinese medicine diagnosis I correlate with impaired zeta potential.

Vaccinosis shews itself as formidable acute disease that may terminate fatally, or it may manifest itself as a chronic affection. The ordinary forms of vaccinia must be included under acute vaccinosis. (p. 6-7).

Chronic vaccinosis more particularly lies completely beyond the ken of ordinary medicine , and although it will sometimes turn up in literature as “Ill effects of vaccination,” it is, nevertheless, but an unrecognised waif, much to the disadvantage of suffering mankind and of medical science . It has not [barring a few exceptions] yet been sufficiently studied to be readily defined; except causally, indeed, its very existence is not generally admitted . But a study of the following cases will afford ample evidence that its symptoms are very like the pathogenetic symptoms of Thuja Occidentalis.

Some may, perhaps, say that vaccinosis is the same as vaccinia; this is, however, not so; vaccinosis is vaccinia and something more, for if a person is vaccinated unsuccessfully he has not had vaccinia, whereas some of the worst cases of (my) vaccinosis which I have met with were just those in whom the vaccination did not ” take,” as the saying goes. Hence, I must call attention to what I believe is a fact, that it often does take deep hold of the constitution without calling forth any local phenomena, and , not only so, but such cases may be even very severe in their internal developments manifested by the supervention of various morbid symptoms after vaccination.

Let us dwell a little on this novel assertion , I was going to say fact, yet probably very few will admit that it is a fact at all , but only a fad of mine , since every body holds that if the vaccination does not “take” the individual has remained uninfluenced by the process of putting vaccine under the cuticle. In other words, when a person is vaccinated and does not take; is, in fact, unsuccessfully vaccinated, it is held that said person is proof against vaccination, and we certify accordingly. Everyone believes that the unsuccessfully vaccinated individual has not in any way been affected or altered by the vaccination.

Close and minute observation , however, teaches me that such is by no means necessarily the case , for not a few persons date their ill health from a so-called unsuccessful ,vaccination. My own conception of the thing is just this :—the vaccinated person is poisoned by the vaccine virus ; what is called the “taking” is, in point of fact, the constitutional re-action whereby the organism frees itself more or less from the inserted virus. If the person do not “ take,” and the virus has been absorbed , the “ taking ” becomes a chronic process-paresis, neuralgia , cephalalgia, pimples and acne. The less a person “takes,” therefore, in such a case, the more is he likely to suffer from chronic vaccinosis, i.e., from the genuine vaccination disease in its chronic form , very frequently a neuralgia or paresis.

Most practitioners will agree that neuralgia is more prevalent now than ever before within the present age, and experience has forced me to ascribe many such cases to vaccinosis.

Burnet cited a case of 10 week old baby who had been healthy, and then suddenly became at risk of dying with the cause of the baby’s illness being impossible for anyone to identify.  After investigating further, he discovered the wet-nurse (surrogate breast milk supplier) for the infant (who was in good health) had received a smallpox booster the day before the infant became ill and she reported the site was “a little painful.”  Burnett also cited another case of a breast-feeding child becoming ill from the smallpox vaccine and another developing eczema and a chronic rash:

Therefore I gave Thuja 6, in pilules , both to babe and nurse, but whether every half-hour or every hour I do not now remember. Calling later in the evening I noticed baby was asleep and looking a little less ghastly. Next morning it was indeed still pale, but practically well ; and the vaccinial vesicles on the nurse’s arm had withered, and they forth with dried up completely, in lieu of becoming pustular. That baby never looked back, and is now a bonny child. (p. 17-18)

Note: there have been also been issue with the COVID-19 vaccines shedding into breast milk.

Burnett’s next case illustrates another key aspect of vaccinosis:

Its subject, a lady of very high rank, over fifty years of age, had been in turns, and for many years, under almost all the leading oculists of London for this neuralgia of the eyes, i.e. , terrible pain at the back of the eyes, coming on in paroxysms and confining her to her room for many days together ; some attacks would last for six weeks . Some of the neuralgic pain, however, remained at all times . Her eyes had been examined by almost every notable oculist in London , and no one could find anything wrong with them structurally, so it was unanimously agreed and declared to be neuralgia of the fifth nerve.

Latterly, and for years, she had tried nothing; whenever an attack came on, she would remain in her darkened bedroom , with her head tied up, bewailing her fate.  To me she exclaimed “My existence is one life-long crucifixion!”

I should have stated that the neuralgia was preceded, and accompanied by influenza.

In the aggregate these attacks of influenza and post-orbital neuralgia confined her to her room nearly half the year. In appearance she was healthy ,well-nourished, rather too much embonpóint, and fairly vigorous. A friend of hers had been benefited by homeopathy in my hands, and she therefore came to me “in utter despair”
…
I reasoned thus : This  lady tells me she has been vaccinated five or six times, and being  thus very much vaccinated, she may be just suffering from chronic vaccinosis, one chief symptom of which is a cephalalgia like hers, so I forthwith prescribed Thuja (30).  It cured, and the cure has lasted till now. The neuralgia disappeared slowly ; in about six weeks (February, 14,1882) I wrote in my case book “The eyes are well!”

Note: impairments of physiologic zeta potential can be cumulative, and sometimes an influenza infection (which also decreases zeta potential) can be sufficient to tip someone with an impaired zeta potential (something commonly seen in the elderly) over their critical threshold.

Upon further follow-up with this patient, she reported her chronic illness of 20 years remained fully resolved 3 years later at the time Burnett’s book went to press.

Next, Burnett details the case of a 12-year old who began losing hair after a vaccination that did not take, and the hair loss reverting following administration of Thuja:

It might have been so, as the hair is very powerfully influenced by the vaccine poisoning.

Note: hair loss is also common with COVID-19 and sometimes occurs after COVID vaccination—which I suspect is due to poor circulation or the cell danger response (CDR) being triggered since hair loss responds to to treatments for those pathologies.

Next, Burnett details the case of a gentleman suffering from recurrent colds, boils, pimples, warts, severe frontal headaches, chest pain and chronic fatigue preventing him from working at the office:

The habitual influenza, the chronic frontal headache, the pimply skin, the feeling of general malaise point, according to my experience, to vaccinosis.  But had patient been vaccinated? Yes. Four times, and did not “take” the last three times….This case made a considerable sensation in the gentleman’s large office-circle, partly because the change in his condition was so sudden and complete, and partly because he came to homeopathy demonstratively unwillingly, and in consequence of the earnest solicitations of his chef de bureau.

Next Burnett details the case of a woman who had been vaccinated three times:

On December 22nd, 1882, a young lady of 26 came under my care for an ugly state of the nails of her fingers. Naturally a lady of her age would not be indifferent to the state of her nails. These nails are indented rather deeply, and in addition to these indentations there are black patches on the under surfaces of the nails, reaching into the quick…Has continued the Thuja 30 for just about three months, with the result that  within a fortnight from commencing with it the black patches under the nails began to disappear, and there is now no trace of them.

Next, Burnett details the case of a young lady with a variety of issues including a drooping eyelid who had seen two skilled homeopaths prior to him, and like both of them, Burnett could only achieve partial symptomatic improvement until he utilized Thuja:

She still complained of ptosis of the left side, sleepiness, reeling to the right when walking out of doors, tendency to fall to the right…her tongue was cracked…These more or less well-chosen remedies wrought a great change in the patient, but on the 29th July, 1882, she still complained that the left eye was wrong.  It made her feel sea-sick when she read ; pains in left eye worse in the early morn ; some ptosis of left upper lid; eye-ball stiff, and an aching across it and right across the forehead, and she was giddy in walking about.

The case having thus come to a standstill, I cast about for some aetiologico-therapeutic approaches, and in so doing learned that she had been vaccinated four times in all ; the last time, three years ago, took but faintly.

Thuja 30 soon cured the ptosis and the other described symptoms.

The next case can be summarized by Burnets concluding statement:

Loss of virile power is frequently a result of vaccination, and when the local debility is due to this cause it is really wonderful how the case is altered by a few doses of Thuja.

He had had slight hemiplegia of the right side, and still shewed some symptoms of paralysis, e.g., weakness of right arm, occasional dragging of the legs, loss of memory, impaired vision, and loss of power generally.  His effective virility was extinct and had been so for two or three years, and naturally this did not tend to raise his spirits. I treated him for a few months with but slight benefit, when one day he complained of a frontal headache that at once reminded me of the Thuja headache. I gave him Thuja occidentalis 30 (4 in 24) and within a few days he remarked a very notable improvement, feeling better than he had for three years. Getting this report at his next visit, I fell to questioning him about vaccination, which I had previously not done…”How many times have you been vaccinated?” “I have been vaccinated six or seven times.” “Did it take every time?” “No, never.”

Following the four doses of Thuja, he also experienced a “hypopubic resurrection of great importance” and after additional Thuja, “he became ,in his wife’s words “quite a different man; all paralytic symptoms having disappeared, and the old headache had not returned at the end of 1883, when I last saw him.

Note: erectile dysfunction is another side effect I periodically hear about from vaccine injured patients.

Next, a case is detailed of a partially disabled woman who had been vaccinated five times with one not taking.  She had achieved minimal benefit from medical care up to that point, minor benefit from other homeopathics, and experienced a complete resolution from Thuja:

Her symptoms were legion; she was bent forward, could scarcely walk, her spine very tender and painful; twitchings; pain all down the back; and chilliness, worse at night. Her liver was decidedly enlarged and there was pain in the right side…. “I have not been so well for three or four years ; I feel strong, and can do anything.”

Another complex case discusses a patient who was vaccinated three times, with the last vaccination not taking.  The patient experienced partial improvement from homeopathics targeted to her symptoms and complete resolution following Thuja:

…complaining of much epigastric beating, pain in left side, great chilliness, and
writer’s cramp of the right side.  An examination showed enlargement of the spleen, and a swelling of the left ovary of about the size of a hen’s egg. Her breath is heavy, and she gets giddiness. She has frontal headache of a severe kind almost every day for a long time….Questioned on November 16th as to which medicine cured the headache and the cramps, she instantly said it was the powders (i.e.,the Thuja).

Another case discusses a 16 year old girl with arrested development and partial paralysis present for most of her life, who was born to parents of good health and high intellect (precluding a hereditary cause for her disability).  She received a smallpox vaccination at 3 months which did not take, but did take at 6 months when both arms were subsequently vaccinated:

This was her state: roof of mouth very much arched; left side of face drawn to the left so that her mouth is awry. She speaks very badly ; cannot articulate properly; and is very deaf.  Has always been so.  Has a polypus in left nostril; the tonsils are enormously hypertrophied; breathes very loudly. Left mamma smaller than the right; left side of thorax generally smaller than the right. Tongue is cracked; pain in left side for years; frontal headache for a twelve month.

Following Thuja, her headaches, articulation, hearing and facial palsies greatly improved. A second homeopathic, Ceanothus Americanus was also administered following Thuja which restored the decreased growth of her left side.

Read the Whole Article

The post What Can The Smallpox Vaccines Teach Us About COVID Vax Injuries? appeared first on LewRockwell.

‘Judaism is to do justice and to have mercy and to walk humbly with God; and all the rest is commentary and of secondary importance’.

So wrote Rabbi Elmer Berger, a leading Jewish thinker of the 50’s and 60’s, who opposed what he called Israeli-style ‘Jewish nationalism.’

Another renowned Jewish thinker, Arthur Koestler, warned that Israel was becoming ‘a nasty little Sparta.’

This past week, much of the rest of the world, sickened by the mass slaughter and destruction in Gaza wrought by Israel, joined in calls for creation of a Palestinian state. This obvious solution to the agonies of five million stateless Palestinian refugees would be a start to making whole one of the world’s largest refugee problems. Over 147 nations have recognized the Palestinian state. But until now, the United States, France, Britain and Germany have refused to heed the cries of the savagely abused Palestinian refugees.

This week, France, true to its libertarian traditions, finally announced it would recognize the Palestinian state this September.  Spain, Australia, Ireland and Saudi Arabia (which has been watching Gaza from the sidelines) and even usually timid Canada joined in. So too all of Latin America.  Germany, still handcuffed by accusations of wartime crimes, is still dithering.  Britain claimed it would recognize Palestine with certain conditions, giving it a way to wriggle out of the promise. A large part of the UK Labour Party has revolted, demanding an end to the massacres in Palestine as the Rothschilds strain to support Israel.

Interestingly, Egypt, the largest and most important Arab nation, remained quiet.  It has been secretly colluding with Israel in repressing the Palestinians.

The United States continues to openly back Israel’s draconian policies that have so far killed at least 60,000 Palestinians, mainly women and children.  President Trump has revealed himself as a Trojan Horse for Israel’s expansionist far right. He, so far, seems unconcerned that his military, financial and diplomatic support for Israel’s hard right has hurt America’s image around the globe.  It may take American voters to change his mind.  But they remain beguiled by the corporate-controlled media which promotes Israel’s arguments.

Still, it’s clear there has been a sea-change in the world’s view of Palestine. Behind all the fevered talk about removing Palestinians there are moderate-minded Jewish politicians and soldiers who realize that they must eventually find a way to live with Palestinians and share the land – as Rabbi Berger advised. The alternative is ethnic cleansing, genocide and more slaughter. 

What a stain on the honor of Judaism, what a horror after the WWII holocaust.  Israel’s repression in Gaza and strong-arming of Palestinian supporters and the media around the globe have created a tsunami of antisemitism.  Rabbi Berger warned that the Arab-Israeli conflict would eventually infect the United States and endanger our republic. He was very right.

The core of this conflict is attempts by Israel’s far right parties to seize more land for the Jewish state, notably the occupied West Bank, Gaza, southern Lebanon and bits of Syria. 

Greater Israel is the grand strategy. For some of the more fanatical groups now running Israel’s government (and giving marching orders to the spineless US Congress) Israel might expand into more of Syria, Iraq’s oil fields, even Saudi Arabia and Egypt. 

The post Israel, Listen to Rabbi Berger appeared first on LewRockwell.

In 1761 lawyer James Otis delivered a five-hour speech in a packed Boston courthouse in which he dismantled Parliament’s claim that general search warrants known as writs-of-assistance were constitutionally valid.  Though Otis lost the case his scholarly and fiery rhetoric won the support of onlookers such as 25-year-old John Adams, who near the end of his life wrote about his experience:

Every Man of an immense crowded Audience appeared to me to go away, as I did, ready to take Arms against Writs of Assistants. Then and there was the first scene of the first Act of opposition to the Arbitrary claims of Great Britain. Then and there the Child Independence was born.

What did Otis say that revolutionized so many people?  Author-researcher A. J. Langguth tells us the King’s advocate Jeremiah Gridley delivered a death blow to Otis’s case by claiming “the British constitution was now only and whatever Parliament said it was.”  Therefore, case closed.

But not for Otis.  He fought back taking Enlightenment philosophy to its logical conclusion.  As you read Otis’s words consider how utterly foreign they sound in today’s world, while at the same sparking exhilaration to know men once spoke like this:

Every man was his own sovereign . . . No other creature on earth could legitimately challenge a man’s right to his life, his liberty and his property. That principle, that unalterable law, took precedence—here Otis was answering Gridley directly—even over the survival of the state. [emphasis added]

Given that today states are sovereign entities wherever they exist, and by virtue of that status can legally overpower any domestic challenger, to assert that each individual is sovereign would seem at best wishful thinking.  Individuals can act like they’re sovereign but the state will carry them off somewhere, if necessary.  If “state” is defined in Rothbardian terms as a criminal gang writ large, then the adage “might is right” permeates state behavior.  Stripped of its august facade that’s what state sovereignty means.  Otis was saying we don’t need states.

In his inflammatory 1776 pamphlet Common Sense Thomas Paine wrote that “Some writers have so confounded society with government, as to leave little or no distinction between them; whereas they are not only different, but have different origins. . . . Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one. . .” Though he made a critical distinction between government and governed, Paine unfortunately went on to equate a lack of government with “miseries.”

In his autobiography Thomas Jefferson wrote that

the question was not whether, by a Declaration of Independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists. That, as to the people or parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them.

Acquiescence has marked mankind’s long history.  Most people have preferred to surrender their sovereignty than assert it.  Today, in spite of Otis, Paine, and Jefferson, they don’t even realize they were born with it.

Following the Revolutionary War, Paine went to England to build an iron bridge and became friends with MP Edmund Burke.  As the revolution in France was transpiring they soon disagreed — strongly — as to its merit, with Paine praising it and Burke feeling threatened by it.  When Burke made his views public Paine wrote Rights of Man as a rejoinder to Burke’s position.

Paine invoked the “state of nature,” an Enlightenment phrase, to attack Burke’s defense of the corrupt English government:

It has been thought a considerable advance towards establishing the principles of Freedom to say that Government is a compact between those who govern and those who are governed; but this cannot be true, because it is putting the effect before the cause; for as man must have existed before governments existed, there necessarily was a time when governments did not exist . . .

The fact therefore must be that the individuals themselves, each in his own personal and sovereign right, entered into a compact with each other to produce a government: and this is the only mode in which governments have a right to arise, and the only principle on which they have a right to exist.  [emphasis added]

The government so formed would be the creation of people who were delegated to form a government.  But in doing so the delegates, intentionally or not, transfer sovereignty from the individuals to the government, and the result is the chaos and corruption that follows.

By contrast, on the free market under laissez-faire, which means without coercive interference, individuals conduct their economic lives without surrendering their sovereignty.

It’s not as if governments don’t realize the economic value of freedom.  The ones in charge seem to have heard about Aesop and his tale of the goose.  Paine spent the first 37 years of his life in England and had experienced this first-hand:

The portion of liberty enjoyed in England is just enough to enslave a country more productively than by despotism, and that as the real object of all despotism is revenue, a government so formed obtains more than it could do either by direct despotism, or in a full state of freedom, and is, therefore on the ground of interest, opposed to both.

Paine, however brilliant at times, is no stranger to inconsistent writing.  At the conclusion of the American Revolution he wrote the final installment of his American Crisis essays.  Elated by the American victory, he seemingly transferred sovereignty from its source to the collective:

Sovereignty must have power to protect all the parts that compose and constitute it: and as UNITED STATES we are equal to the importance of the title, but otherwise we are not. . . .

It is with confederated states as with individuals in society; something must be yielded up to make the whole secure. In this view of things we gain by what we give, and draw an annual interest greater than the capital.

No one would question that “something” must be yielded to gain a definite result.  But surrendering sovereignty should never be on the table.

The post The Life Source Missing From Today’s Narratives appeared first on LewRockwell.

In some ways it is refreshing to have a president who is so profoundly ignorant that one’s expectations regarding what good policies might actually come out of the federal government are really, really low. It took Donald Trump six months to accept the reality of the slaughter going on in Gaza where Israel is killing roughly one hundred Palestinians every day whose only crime is that they are looking for food, water and shelter. Admittedly Trump has actually been bold enough to challenge his Israeli masters by declaring that videos from Gaza show a lot of people who Trump admitted were “starving”, and promised to “take care” of it. Yet he has done nothing but support the Israeli blockade and repress or even deport any voices in America who protest against the war crimes. And right before Trump promised to “take care” of starving Palestinians, an Israeli official described his pleasure to report that when it came to pressuring Israel “to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza, Trump [has] made no such requests.” So the killing continues, financed armed and supported by Donald J Trump just as was the case under Genocide Joe Biden.

Indeed, instead of pushing Israel to allow in aid, Trump partnered with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to destroy the existing United Nations system for delivering it. As Trump took office in January, Israel banned access to Gaza by the United Nations Agency for Palestinian refugees in Gaza, and Netanyahu was and still is backed up by Trump. Trump’s chief negotiator Steve Witkoff has boasted that there is “no space” between the president and Netanyahu on handling the Gaza issue, with Trump continuing to call on the Israelis to “finish the job,” which clearly means doing whatever necessary to get rid of the Palestinian “problem.” Trump has also made clear that Israel will “manage” and “preside over” the distribution of goods as part of its security measures to keep Hamas from stealing the food, which is a lie that has been heavily promoted by Israel. Armed Israeli settlers have also been given a green light to intercept and blockade food and medicine convoys as they approach the Gaza border.

Trump’s odd pledge to provide assistance to Gaza came as he sat alongside British Prime Minister Keir Starmer last week. He said “I know your nation’s joining us, and we have all of the European nations joining us, and others also called and they want to be helpful. So we’re going to set up food centers and where the people can walk in and no boundaries. We’re not going to have fences.” He elaborated “We’re going to be getting some good, strong food. We can save a lot of people. Some of those kids — that’s real starvation.” Trump earlier last Monday had been asked if he agreed with Benjamin Netanyahu’s comments that there was no starvation in Gaza. He responded somewhat incoherently “I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly, because those children look very hungry.”

And it is certain that the children will stay hungry as Israel concentrates the Gazan population into restricted areas that will become death traps. Trump’s way of discussing the Gaza issue is, characteristically, very awkward and poorly expressed with “good, strong food” and “no boundaries…no fences.” His pledge to provide aid is also basically a lie or a “misspoke” as Trump has deferred to Israel in terms of how the flow of assistance will actually work. The reality is that both Trump and Starmer are reacting to popular sentiment in both the UK and the US, where voters have been rapidly losing any sympathy they might have had for the Israeli “security” policy vis-à-vis the Palestinians. Both leaders can reasonably be described as dedicated Zionists who are “controlled” by the Israel lobbies in their respective countries.

But more bloodshed was not the only Trump news during the past week. Apparently his outstanding performance in going to war with Ukraine, Iran, Syria and the Palestinians simultaneously has earned him recognition and rewards that will bring honor to his name for years to come. We are still waiting on possible receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize as recommended by no less an international notable than Bibi Netanyahu, but the Republican Party in the US has stepped in to fill the gap with legislation that will change the name of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington DC, removing the Kennedy and replacing it with Trump. Inside the building itself the main opera house will be renamed for the First Lady Melina Trump.

I must admit to being turned off by the promiscuous honoring of people in public life who have no honor and who, in Trump’s case, probably cannot spell or pronounce the word. My local post office here in Virginia was threatened with being posthumously named after Madeleine Albright by a virtue of a bill submitted to Congress by our local Democratic Party representative. As one recalls, Albright was completely unapologetic, quite the contrary, over the killing of 500,000 Iraqi children which she described as “worth it.” That makes her similar to our current crop of brainwashed psychopaths, including Trump and his predecessor Joe Biden, who have been complicit in Israel’s war crimes. In the case of my local post office, the bill to honor Albright did not advance, suggesting that some smells are too extreme even for members of Congress.

One might recall that the Kennedy Center has been around for a long time and was meant to honor an assassinated president. JFK and his wife were, in fact, active supporters of the arts both when he was in the Senate and after he became president. Trump and First Lady Trump’s ties to theater and cultural events is somewhat more elusive unless one considers parties at Jeffrey Epstein’s various residences to be high culture.

The real tragedy is that the name change is doable, even though there are several hoops that have to be jumped through to accomplish it. The federal government first authorized the Center’s construction in 1958. The project, funded by both the government and private donations, stalled and was revived under President John F. Kennedy, whose family led an effort to get the center funded and built. It was named in his honor following his assassination. Two months later, President Lyndon B Johnson signed the legislation making it a living memorial to Kennedy. The law relating to the building states that “After December 2, 1983, no additional memorials or plaques in the nature of memorials shall be designated or installed in the public areas of the John F Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.” Notably, there are four large new portraits of the first and second couples, the Trumps and Vances, in the center’s Hall of Nations, the main entryway to the facility. Until this year, the public spaces included only a bronze bust of President John F. Kennedy, so Trump or his facilitators have to a certain extent ignored that ruling. Nevertheless, as the Center’s names are protected by law it would require a new law to change that, which in turn would have to obtain 60 of the votes in the Senate to pass. As the Democrats are not likely to go along with that, the necessary majority would be lacking.

And that’s not all. The beatification of Donald Trump by Republicans in Congress continues to grow, and, let us not forget the Israeli government, which has called him the most pro-Israel president ever, meaning that the accolades with be fully backed by the immensely powerful Israel Lobby.

There are in fact a number of bills and other proposals floating around in Washington that would elevate Donald Trump the Man, turning him into something many magnitudes greater. Imagine getting the day off work in the near future to celebrate not only Flag Day on June 14th but also Donald Trump’s birthday as part of the federal holiday. Or going to a bank on the Washington Metro which will be called the Trump Train to withdraw money and receiving a $100 bill with Donald’s portrait on it. Or landing in an airplane at Donald J. Trump International Airport, formerly Dulles International, near the nation’s capital before going to a performance at the Donald J. Trump Center for Performing Arts. Any and all of the above would be possible if a series of bills and measures Republican lawmakers have sponsored this year were to be approved.

Trump is little more than six months into his second term, but some Republicans are ready to elevate him into the pantheon of American greats, proposing an ever-growing list of bills paying tribute well before his second term ends. One lawmaker even proposes carving his face into Mount Rushmore next to Washington, Lincoln, Jefferson and Teddy Roosevelt. Trump has told friends that would be his “dream” to be carved into Mount Rushmore. Fortunately perhaps, the National Park Service, which oversees Mount Rushmore National Memorial, has cited two reasons that Trump’s face cannot be added. First, it considers Mount Rushmore to be a “completed work of art.” Second, there is no room: “The carved portion of Mount Rushmore has been thoroughly evaluated, and there are no viable locations left for additional carvings.”

And the honors list grows longer and longer. Representative Joe Wilson of South Carolina carries a pamphlet he gives to colleagues asking them to sponsor a bill that would direct the Bureau of Printing and Engraving to design and print a $250 bill in June 2026 bearing Trump’s image. The honor would coincide with the 250th anniversary of the United States Declaration of Independence. It is, by the way, illegal to put the image of a living person on US paper currency or on a coin but Trump’s people seem to believe that rules exist to be broken.

If all of this sounds crazy to the reader, well it is, and it is intended to demonstrate the extent to which our country’s essentially ignorant leader has embraced a cult of personality about himself that goes beyond what Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Adolph Hitler had to offer. This immature but hubristic nut case will have us in more wars before too long just to demonstrate that he is so powerful and righteous that he can do it, not because there is any benefit to Americans or to the United States. Just witness the nonsense that has been going on over the past six months replete with phony negotiations leading to the recent warnings to Russia, the incessant pandering to Israel’s sadism, and the brain-dead attack on a non-threatening Iran. And in the latest development, Trump has declared that a “trade deal” with neighbor Canada will be “very difficult” because Ottawa intends to recognize Palestine! The US also stated on Thursday that it is going to impose sanctions on the Palestinians’ self-governance organization as well as on the body that represents it on the international stage. The sanctions will affect both the Palestinian Authority (PA) which was established by the Oslo peace accords, and the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) which was recognized as the official representative of the Palestinian people in return for it recognizing Israel and renouncing violence. The State Department said it will starting now deny visas to PLO members and PA officials.

Who needs any more of this nonsense?

Reprinted with permission from Unz Review.

The post Hypocrisy Thy Name Is Trump appeared first on LewRockwell.

Even though it isn’t a nut, reality is especially hard to crack these days. But if you closely observe daily life all around you, no matter how superficial it may at first seem, you will catch many glimpses of why this may be so. The signs of falsehood are everywhere here in the land of make-believe, for those willing to decipher them. The big lies and deceptions of politicians, intelligence services, and their media minions have their counterparts in trivial encounters where, as Melville said, “A smile is the chosen vehicle for all ambiguities.” Such smiles plaster not just human faces, but appear in the signs and symbols of the wider culture everywhere you look. They are meant to tranquilize with trivia. They are offered as bait to induce people to stop worrying and be happy as their leaders smash the world to bits.

I recently chanced to look down the cereal aisle of a supermarket where my already florescent-irritated eyes were further dazzled by an entire row of technicolor boxes of the garbage that Americans eat to begin their days. First came the poison laid low down for the kids so they can reach the traps and pester their parents for what would better be served to rats. These I passed, only to stop at a big orange yellow box that was advertised on sale. I had seen it before, just as often as I had seen pictures of Van Gogh’s sunflowers adorning dentists’ offices and funeral homes, twin bright colors before which we are beseeched to smile and be happy like Vincent. The cereal was General Mills’ Honey Nut Cheerios.

At the center of the box in large letters outlined in bright orange screamed the words “made with REAL HONEY.” I quickly grabbed a box since I am always searching for reality, but then it struck me, as I fell off my motorized horse like Paul on the road to Damascus (not today’s bombed Damascus), that such an assertion was strange, for the cereal is called Honey Nut Cheerios, which would imply it was  made with honey. So why are they boldly asserting it is? Perhaps because the honey used is so minuscule it’s necessary to use a bullhorn to assert its reality. Or perhaps the clue lies in that word “real,” whose meaning is really confounding. It sounded like politicians in reverse who claim war is peace when it isn’t or introduce all their words by saying “to tell you the truth,” as they proceed to lie. So it always was, is, and will be? But then my existential search brought me to that ah-ha moment as I looked at the ingredients list and realized there were no nuts in the cereal. Where were the nuts, the people buying the cereal or me? By next year will the box announce REAL HONEY and REAL NUTS?

Or will they say it is made with REAL HOLES? Who knew that? Who knows that the holes are more real than that which surrounds them, or that nothing is more real than nothing? Why are some people always trying get something or other into holes, while others try to ignore their reality, even as the final holes patiently await us?

It then occurred to me that this semiotic search of mine (the analysis of cultural objects like advertisements, food, or activities such as golf, etc. for deeper meanings and social myths), like those of Roland Barthes in his acclaimed 1957 book, Mythologies, would not go over well with those who like being deceived, which seems to be most people. But my search continued, despite my wife calling out, “Come on, Honey,” to which I murmured to the cereal box, ”Really?”

My existential search then went into rapid overdrive, for when a wife says, “Come on, Honey,” who can hold back? I saw that the box cover read that the cereal was “naturally flavored,” which felt so reassuring until I wondered what they meant by “naturally” and why they were so insistent upon announcing that as well. Lower down on the box in large bold letters it said that eating the cereal “Can help LOWER CHOLESTEROL* as part of a heart healthy diet.” That asterix led down to much smaller and harder-to-read gibberish words that said that eating the cereal, within a larger low-fat diet, “may reduce the risk of heart attack.” Mr. Death is natural, too, I thought, but he wasn’t mentioned.

I was getting sick of my search and took another look at the cover whereupon the picture of a cartoon-looking bee with a honey wand – Buzz the Bee, I later learned they call him – reminded me of Tinker Bell from Peter Pan, the story of a boy who never wants to grow up because death comes in time as with the crocodile who has swallowed a clock and eats Captain Hook. No one dies in Neverland except the bad guy. Yet everyone seems to do that in our Neverland, where the bad guys kill the good people through a cornucopia of means.

For a long time there was a store in the town where I live called Crystal Essence that recently closed.  I called it the rock shop. It sold a wide assortment of New Age products from crystals and rocks through incense and books on how to be happy forever. Somehow deathless. One day I passed this store, which was highly successful with tourists and locals alike, and saw a poster for Fairy Dusting. Perverse thinker that I am, I inquired within about this procedure. They sent me upstairs in the rear of the store where a woman greeted me with a big smile. “Did I want to be fairy dusted?” she asked. I said I was just inquiring as to what it was and how much it cost. She said $40, and you lie on a table as I circle you while dusting you with my wand filled with fairy dust, as Tinker Bell did. “What was the point?” I asked. She said it cleansed your aura and gave you a healthy journey through life and multiple reincarnations. “So it will help me not to die?” I asked. “Yes, she said with a huge smile. I said, “Thanks” and left, but not without thoughts of Peter Pan, Tinker Bell and a country that will never grow up. A look around in the most ordinary places will confirm that.

Still standing in the cereal aisle, I thought of my fairy duster and Buzz the Bee with his wand on the cover of the box that I held in my hand. Everywhere we look we see promotions for products that will dust us so we will live forever. The American culture of death threatens and kills while simultaneously offering anodynes. Deny, affirm, and cure. Honey Nut Cheerios, full of good cheer.

As I shoved the box back on the shelf, I noticed it said down low on its side that it was bioengineered. They want to bioengineer us all, I thought, mechanically petrify us, and so I revved up my engine and hurried to find my wife.

She had already checked out and was waiting for me at the door. She called out, with an enticing smile, “Come on, Honey!” And despite my deep existential semiotic search for truth in the cereal aisle, and with an inner nod to Barthes, I ran after her, for when a woman says such words to you, what man can hold back?

Cheerio!

As Jeffrey Epstein wouldn’t say: Beware the honey trap, My Lost Boys.

Cheerio!

Reprinted with the author’s permission.

The post Real Holes in Neverland appeared first on LewRockwell.

Some months ago, I pointed out that a benefit of Preacher Johnnie Moore’s taxpayer-funded defense firm, the Orwellian labeled Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, had one benefit and one benefit only.  It would allow its American employees, former soldiers in many cases, to be on the ground in Gaza seeing what the US is faithfully funding, and what Israel has done and is doing.

Israel, with the active support and blessing of over 80% of Israelis since late 2023, has been violently destroying Gazan structures, food and water systems, education, healthcare, along with many of the 2.3 million Palestinians who had created a culture and an economy – in spite of decades of periodic attacks, and the occupying state’s military domination and constantly evolving restrictions on trade, travel and movement.  In spite of this, and perhaps shocking to many Zionists, Gaza has survived and thus far, resisted its intended demise.

The tiny strip is now a moonscape, courtesy of the equivalent of 8 Hiroshima sized nuclear detonations, over half a million Gazans have been killed or lost in the rubble, and the intentional starvation, intensified in March by Israel, is reaching its tipping point.

Acute famine is part of the US and Israeli strategy for Gaza. IPC Phase Five has been purposely created in Gaza, and the upcoming and imminent stage is massive human losses as the weakest and sickest are already dead, and the stronger and healthier segments of society themselves begin to starve to death.  Resistance to disease for Gazans has already collapsed.

How do we know what starvation does to a population?  Because state-enforced starvation is a common historical tactic of empires and states against those they intend to punish and dominate.  The US government is happy to recognize and abhor the state starvations of populations, as we see in this recent US commemoration of the 91st anniversary of the Holomodor.  We study in universities the state conducted starvation and genocide against Jews and others by the World War II Axis powers. The government of Israel, and that of the United States, presides over a deep body of knowledge about engineering starvation and famine, and profiting from it.

The powerful conversation between Tucker Carlson and recently retired Army LTC Tony Agular this week is a point of light emerging from the fact that US soldiers are now on the ground supporting this imperial project of death and destruction.  Just as the US has experienced in other imperial wars, our own soldiers and Marines – like Lt General Smedley Butler – end up being the best witnesses, the angriest citizens, the boldest truth-tellers.

Agular is a military hero, which means his story is pertinent to Americans and politicians alike.  He is reporting on a genocide that is technically removed from a direct US policy – as far as I know, Trump and the US Congress, with the exception of porcine scum Randy Fine, have not endorsed genocide or starvation publicly.  Because of this, Agular’s story is particularly powerful.  He is an American soldier with a dozen deployments supporting American foreign policy of the last 25 years.  He is apolitical. He is focused on military best practices, law and justice. As a West Point grad, he does not lie, cheat or steal, nor tolerate anyone who does. He is ethical. Perhaps most importantly, unlike most Americans, he is unafraid.

The US taxpayer funds the Gazan genocide.  The US government authorizes and allows the starvation there, and yet, President Trump has the power to do two things right now.  He can freeze aid and weapons to Israel, and he can authorize military force against Israel in order to create a hundred road entry points to Gaza from the two largest US foreign subsidy recipients (Israel and Egypt), through which the US government can drive in thousands of trucks a day filled with food, water, and medicine, doctors, nurses, and health specialists.  The trucks and the donations are there.  Why doesn’t he?

Only a few weeks ago, Trump had no problem bombing a country for no discernable national security reason, without notifying Congress nor seeking its consent.  The aftermath of Trump’s “bold” decision to spend $200 million in order to have a cutely monikered “12 Day War” was confirmation that he presides as the current American emperor, as blatantly wasteful as Caligula and confirming growing suspicions that Trump may be our very own Commodus, or perhaps more appropriately, Caracalla.

Fascinated by war and conflict, Caracalla ended up militarizing and centralizing power in the Roman Empire, but “the extravagance and brutality of Caracalla’s reign ultimately undermined his authority.”  His reign was in the pre-Christian era Roman Empire, where state ethics were unhinged from societal ethics or religion as we understand them today.

Unhinged does indeed describe the US government today.  Whether you are angered that Trump reversed himself on Epstein, or happy that you are getting a consolation prize in the “reveal” of  Obama, Clinton, and Biden criminality – you are ruled by the unhinged.  Whether you love the military because it is “Number 1” or are happy that the US military is no longer “Number 1,” you are ruled by the unhinged.  Whether you oppose genocide in Gaza, or you cheer it – you are ruled by the unhinged.

Unhinged can be a psychological judgement, and there is evidence that Israeli society today satisfies that mental health criteria.  I’m using unhinged simply as a construction concept, the disconnect of a door with its frame.  The frame of the US government – the Constitution – is rotted and tattered.  These frames won’t hold any door, and thus we have unhinged function, where force or impetus for good may be applied to the state, but it doesn’t – and it cannot – result in the desired result. Case in point, Israel is self-destructing as a blatant murderous, ethnostate bent on geographical expansion and war above all.  What is worse, the average American Republican, Democrat and Independent – on record opposing US policies of fighting other peoples’ wars, subsidizing other people’s economies, militaries, education and health care – lives under a government that is orchestrating and tolerating genocide in Gaza, one they both know about and oppose! The American population is deprived of their money, their will, their voice, and their political function because the state framework is decrepit and corrupted beyond repair.

True freedom of speech is rarely observed, and barely tolerated, yet it is possible, as Tucker Carlson and Tony Agular, and millions of others who see and share this interview are demonstrating.  Colonel Agular also offers a number of specific steps that could be taken today, from a practical perspective – but the US state, unhinged, is not only unpredictable under pressure, it is inoperative, broken.  To my Marxist and Republican friends, who believe they could just fix the state, and or change its leaders, to make it work “as it should,” you are fantasists of a dead era, and complicit cowards.

This state-designed, funded, and implemented genocide in Gaza, and those to come, closer to home – are on you.

The post Our Unhinged Government appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, John Frahm.

Politico

The post Donors to Trump allies’ anti-Massie super PAC revealed appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, Bruce McLane.

The post Most accurate Epstein Venn diagram appeared first on LewRockwell.

Click Here:

Steve Kirsch

The post The single most convincing COVID vaccine harm signal to date appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes Tim McGraw:

I watched this movie tonight. It’s free on Amazon Prime. Jake Gyllenhaal does a great job as the lead, but Conor MacGregor steals the show.

The post “Roadhouse” (2024) Trailer appeared first on LewRockwell.

Click here:

NY Post

The post Documents Show Hillary OK’d Plan to “Smear” Trump with Russia Hoax appeared first on LewRockwell.

The post ‘Watergate on steroids’: Hillary Clinton’s Trump-Russia Hoax Exposed appeared first on LewRockwell.

Il manoscritto fornisce un grimaldello al lettore, una chiave di lettura semplificata, del mondo finanziario e non che sembra essere andato fuori controllo negli ultimi quattro anni in particolare. Questa una storia di cartelli, a livello sovrastatale e sovranazionale, la cui pianificazione centrale ha raggiunto un punto in cui deve essere riformata radicalmente e questa riforma radicale non pu avvenire senza una dose di dolore economico che potrebbe mettere a repentaglio la loro autorit . Da qui la risposta al Grande Default attraverso il Grande Reset. Questa la storia di un coyote, che quando non riesce a sfamarsi all'esterno ricorre all'autofagocitazione. Lo stesso accaduto ai membri del G7, dove i sei membri restanti hanno iniziato a fagocitare il settimo: gli Stati Uniti.

____________________________________________________________________________________

(Versione audio della traduzione disponibile qui: https://open.substack.com/pub/fsimoncelli/p/leggere-tra-le-bugie)

Quando Avril Haines, Direttrice dell'Intelligence Nazionale, annunciò durante l'esercitazione pandemica Event 201 nel 2019 che avrebbero “inondato la zona di fonti attendibili”, pochi compresero questo anticipo di controllo coordinato delle narrazioni. Nel giro di pochi mesi lo abbiamo visto dispiegarsi in tempo reale: messaggistica unificata su tutte le piattaforme, soppressione del dissenso e controllo coordinato della narrazione che ha ingannato gran parte del mondo.

Ma non tutti sono rimasti ingannati. Alcuni hanno capito subito, mettendo in discussione ogni aspetto fin dal primo giorno; altri hanno pensato che si trattasse semplicemente di un governo incompetente che cercava di proteggerci. Molti inizialmente hanno accettato il principio di precauzione: meglio prevenire che curare. Ma poiché ogni fallimento politico puntava nella stessa direzione – verso un maggiore controllo e una minore azione umana – il modello è diventato impossibile da ignorare. Chiunque non fosse completamente assorbito dal sistema ha dovuto alla fine confrontarsi con il suo vero scopo: non proteggere la salute o la sicurezza, ma espandere il controllo.

Una volta riconosciuto questo schema di inganno, due domande dovrebbero sorgere immediatamente nella mente di ogni persona ogni volta che le notizie più importanti dominano i titoli dei giornali: “Su cosa stanno mentendo?” e “Da cosa ci stanno distraendo?”. Lo schema di inganno coordinato diventa inequivocabile. Basti pensare a come i media abbiano trascorso tre anni a promuovere le cospirazioni del Russiagate, alimentando una divisione sociale senza precedenti e gettando le basi per quella che sarebbe diventata la più grande operazione psicologica della storia. Oggi, mentre i media ci inondano di notizie sull'Ucraina, BlackRock si posiziona per trarre profitto sia dalla distruzione che dalla ricostruzione. Lo schema diventa inequivocabile una volta che lo si vede: crisi create ad arte che chiedono “soluzioni” pianificate in anticipo che espandono sempre il controllo istituzionale.

I media generalisti operano su un doppio inganno: depistaggio e manipolazione. Gli stessi conduttori che ci hanno venduto le armi di distruzione di massa in Iraq durante i telegiornali della sera, promosso la “collusione con la Russia” e insistito sul fatto che il portatile di Hunter Biden fosse “disinformazione russa” occupano ancora le fasce orarie di punta. Proprio come accade con la nomina di RFK Jr. all'HHS, lo schema è costante: attacchi coordinati sostituiscono il dibattito concreto, punti di discussione identici compaiono su tutte le reti e domande legittime vengono liquidate con la diffamazione anziché con le prove. Sbagliare sistematicamente non è un caso, è voluto. Il loro ruolo non è informare, ma fabbricare il consenso.

Il modello è chiaro: saturare i media con spettacoli emotivi, promuovendo al contempo i programmi istituzionali con un controllo minimo. Come si impara a riconoscere un sorriso falso, o a percepire una stonatura in un brano musicale, allo stesso modo si sviluppa un istinto per il tempismo.

Denaro e potere:

• Mentre i media erano concentrati sul 6 gennaio, BlackRock e Vanguard hanno silenziosamente rafforzato la loro presa sul mercato immobiliare residenziale.

• Mentre la stampa era ossessionata dal ban di Trump su Twitter, il Congresso ha approvato il più grande trasferimento di ricchezza con la scusa degli “aiuti Covid”.

• Mentre un’informazione senza fiato seguiva ogni mossa del processo a Johnny Depp, la FED ha stampato più denaro che in tutto il secolo precedente.

• Mentre i media ci inondavano di notizie sull’Ucraina, restrizioni senza precedenti sulla produzione di energia hanno rimodellato l’economia globale.

• Mentre i giornalisti seguivano con il fiato sospeso le accuse a Trump, le banche centrali acceleravano i piani per una valuta digitale programmabile.

Controllo sanitario:

• Mentre i media si concentravano sulla promozione del vaccino tramite le celebrità, un numero senza precedenti di giovani atleti è crollato in campo.

• Mentre le reti televisive trasmettevano ininterrottamente le sparatorie nelle scuole, i documenti rivelavano che Pfizer era a conoscenza di centinaia di effetti collaterali.

• Mentre la copertura mediatica si concentrava sulla “disinformazione” anti-vax, i dati delle assicurazioni mostravano tassi di mortalità in eccesso allarmanti.

Controllo digitale: 

• Mentre i media erano ossessionati dalla moderazione dei contenuti di Twitter, l’infrastruttura dell’ID digitale veniva costruita silenziosamente in tutto il mondo.

• Mentre la copertura mediatica si concentrava sulle preoccupazioni relative alla privacy di TikTok, le banche centrali hanno accelerato lo sviluppo delle valute digitali.

• Mentre gli infiniti dibattiti sui chatbot AI dominavano i titoli dei giornali, i sistemi di sorveglianza biometrica si espandevano a livello globale.

Man mano che questi inganni diventano più evidenti, emergono diverse forme di resistenza. La ricerca della verità assume forme diverse. Alcuni diventano esperti di inganni specifici: documentando i primi successi terapeutici con farmaci riadattati, scoprendo fallimenti nei protocolli ospedalieri, o esplorando l'impatto dei danni da vaccino. Altri sviluppano una prospettiva più ampia per comprendere come le narrazioni stesse vengano costruite.

La brillante capacità di Walter Kirn di riconoscere schemi ricorrenti colpisce il cuore della nostra realtà artificiale. I suoi tweet, che analizzano la copertura mediatica dell'omicidio dell'amministratore delegato di United, rivelano come persino i crimini violenti vengano ormai confezionati come spettacoli di intrattenimento, completi di archi narrativi e colpi di scena. Il lavoro di Kirn evidenzia una dimensione critica del controllo mediatico: trasformando ogni crisi in una narrazione di intrattenimento, l'attenzione viene deviata da questioni più profonde. Invece di chiedersi perché le tutele istituzionali falliscano, o chi ne tragga beneficio, il pubblico viene catturato da un'indignazione attentamente sceneggiata. Questa distrazione deliberata garantisce che i programmi istituzionali procedano senza controlli.

Il suo lavoro rivela come il confezionamento dell'intrattenimento sia al servizio del più ampio sistema di controllo. Mentre ogni indagine richiede una competenza specifica, questo schema di manipolazione narrativa si collega a una rete più ampia di inganni. Come scritto nei pezzi L'industria dell'informazione e Ingegnerizzare la realtà, tutto, dall'istruzione alla medicina, fino alla valuta stessa, è stato catturato da sistemi progettati per plasmare non solo le nostre scelte, ma la percezione stessa della realtà.

La cosa più rivelatrice è ciò che non coprono. Notate la rapidità con cui le notizie scompaiono quando minacciano interessi istituzionali. Ricordate la lista dei clienti di Epstein? L'accaparramento di terreni a Maui? I crescenti danni da vaccino? Il silenzio la dice lunga. Considerate le recenti testimonianze di informatori che rivelano preoccupazioni represse sulla sicurezza presso Boeing, un'azienda da tempo coinvolta con agenzie di regolamentazione e appalti governativi. Due informatori – entrambi ex-dipendenti che avevano lanciato l'allarme su problemi di sicurezza – sono morti in circostanze sospette. La copertura mediatica delle loro morti è scomparsa quasi da un giorno all'altro, nonostante le profonde implicazioni per la sicurezza pubblica e la responsabilità aziendale. Questo schema si ripete in innumerevoli casi in cui la responsabilità sconvolgerebbe strutture di potere radicate, lasciando domande cruciali senza risposta e narrazioni strettamente controllate.

Queste decisioni non sono casuali: sono il risultato delle caratteristiche dei media moderni, dell'influenza degli inserzionisti e della pressione dei governi, garantendo che la narrazione resti strettamente controllata.

Ma forse la cosa più sorprendente non è l'inganno dei media in sé, ma quanto profondamente plasmano la realtà dei loro consumatori. Osservate con quanta sicurezza ripetono frasi chiaramente elaborate nei think tank. Ascoltate come ripetono a pappagallo punti di vista con convinzione religiosa: “Il 6 gennaio è stato peggio dell'11 settembre”, “Fidatevi della scienza ™”, “C'è in gioco la democrazia” e, forse la menzogna più infame della storia moderna, “Sicuro ed efficace”.

La classe dei sedicenti esperti si dimostra particolarmente suscettibile a questa programmazione. La loro competenza diventa una prigione di status: più investono nell'approvazione istituzionale, più difendono con fervore le narrazioni istituzionali. Guardate con quanta rapidità un medico che mette in dubbio la sicurezza dei vaccini perde la licenza, con quanta rapidità un professore che mette in discussione l'ideologia di genere affronta una revisione, con quanta rapidità un giornalista che esce dai ranghi viene inserito nella lista nera.

Il sistema garantisce il rispetto delle regole attraverso la cattura economica: il mutuo diventa il vostro guinzaglio, il vostro status professionale la vostra guardia carceraria. Lo stesso avvocato che si vanta del suo pensiero critico bloccherà aggressivamente qualsiasi messa in discussione delle narrazioni ufficiali. Il professore che insegna a “mettere in discussione le strutture di potere” diventa furioso quando gli studenti mettono in discussione le aziende farmaceutiche.

La validazione circolare rende la programmazione quasi impenetrabile:

• I media citano gli “esperti”

• Gli esperti citano studi sottoposti a revisione paritaria

• Gli studi sono finanziati dall'industria

• L'industria plasma la copertura mediatica

• I “fact-checker” citano il consenso dei media

• Il mondo accademico fa rispettare le conclusioni approvate

Questo circolo vizioso forma un perfetto circuito chiuso.

Ogni componente convalida gli altri, escludendo al contempo informazioni esterne. Provate a trovare il punto di accesso alla verità in questo sistema chiuso. L'orgoglio della classe degli esperti per il proprio pensiero critico diventa ironico: esternalizzano le proprie opinioni a “fonti autorevoli”.

La cosa più inquietante è la loro spontanea volontà di rinunciare alla sovranità. Guardateli mentre si arrendono:

• “Seguo la scienza” (traduzione: aspetto conclusioni approvate)

• “Secondo gli esperti...” (traduzione: non penso con la mia testa)

• “I fact-checker dicono...” (traduzione: lascio che siano gli altri a stabilire la verità)

• “Il consenso è...” (traduzione: mi allineo con il potere)

La loro empatia diventa un'arma usata contro di loro. Mettere in discussione i lockdown? Stai uccidendo la nonna. Dubitare della chirurgia di transizione per i minori? Stai causando suicidi. Resistere alle iniziative di equità? Stai perpetuando l'oppressione. La programmazione funziona facendo percepire la resistenza come crudeltà.

Qualcosa di straordinario sta accadendo sotto il rumore di superficie, però: un autentico risveglio che sfida i tradizionali confini politici. Lo si vede nei sottili scambi tra colleghi quando le narrazioni ufficiali mettono a dura prova la credibilità; nel silenzio crescente alle cene, mentre i discorsi propagandistici cadono nel vuoto; negli sguardi complici tra sconosciuti quando il teatro della salute pubblica raggiunge nuove vette di assurdità.

Questo non è un movimento in senso tradizionale – non può esserlo, poiché le strutture dei movimenti tradizionali sono vulnerabili a infiltrazioni, sovversioni e cattura – è più simile a un'emergenza spontanea, un risveglio distribuito senza una leadership centrale o un'organizzazione formale. Chi vede attraverso gli schemi riconosce la formazione di massa per quello che è, mentre i suoi soggetti proiettano la propria programmazione sugli altri liquidando gli schemi sopraccitati come “teorie del complotto”, “antiscienza”, o altre etichette progettate per impedire un'analisi autentica.

La verità più difficile da accettare non è riconoscere la programmazione, ma confrontarsi con il suo significato per la coscienza umana e per la società stessa. Stiamo assistendo a prove in tempo reale che dimostrano come la maggior parte delle menti umane possa essere catturata e reindirizzata attraverso sofisticate operazioni psicologiche. I loro pensieri non sono i loro, eppure morirebbero per difendere ciò in cui sono stati programmati per credere.

Non si tratta più solo di critica: è una questione esistenziale sulla coscienza umana e sul libero arbitrio. Cosa significa quando la capacità di pensiero indipendente di una specie può essere così dirottata? Quando l'empatia naturale e gli istinti morali diventano armi di controllo? Quando l'istruzione e la competenza riducono la resistenza alla programmazione?

Quest'ultima funziona perché dirotta le pulsioni umane fondamentali:

• Il bisogno di accettazione sociale (ad esempio, mascherarsi come simbolo visibile di conformismo);

• Il desiderio di essere visti come buoni/morali (ad esempio, adottare certe posizioni su questioni sociali senza una comprensione più profonda);

• L'istinto di fidarsi dell'autorità (ad esempio, la fiducia nei funzionari della sanità pubblica nonostante i ripetuti cambiamenti di politica);

• La paura dell'ostracismo (ad esempio, evitare il dissenso per mantenere l'armonia sociale);

• Il conforto del conformismo (ad esempio, ripetere a pappagallo le narrazioni per evitare la dissonanza cognitiva);

• La dipendenza dallo status (ad esempio, segnalare la conformità per mantenere la posizione professionale o sociale).

Ogni tratto umano naturale diventa una vulnerabilità da sfruttare. I più istruiti diventano i più programmabili perché la loro dipendenza dallo status è più profonda. Il loro “pensiero critico” diventa un copione in esecuzione su un hardware corrotto.

Questa è la sfida più importante del nostro tempo: la coscienza umana può evolversi più velocemente dei sistemi progettati per dirottarla? Il riconoscimento di schemi e la consapevolezza possono diffondersi più velocemente del consenso artificiale? Un numero sufficiente di persone può imparare a leggere tra le bugie prima che la programmazione sia completa?

La posta in gioco non potrebbe essere più alta. Non si tratta solo di politica o di alfabetizzazione mediatica: si tratta del futuro della coscienza umana stessa. Se la nostra specie manterrà la capacità di pensiero indipendente potrebbe dipendere da coloro che ancora vi riescono ad accedere, aiutando gli altri a liberarsi dall'incantesimo.

La matrice del controllo si intensifica ogni giorno che passa, ma lo stesso vale per il risveglio. La domanda è: cosa si diffonde più velocemente, la programmazione o la consapevolezza? Il nostro futuro come specie potrebbe dipendere da questa risposta.

[*] traduzione di Francesco Simoncelli: https://www.francescosimoncelli.com/

Supporta Francesco Simoncelli's Freedonia lasciando una mancia in satoshi di bitcoin scannerizzando il QR seguente.

Click Here:

John Leake

The post Beating Back the Trolls appeared first on LewRockwell.

I’ve been a Democrat my whole life — until I walked away in 2021, because it was a Democratic administration that turned America evil, and that turned my own life unconstitutionally upside down.

I have never looked back, except to marvel at how, day by day, policy by policy, today’s DNC seems ever more determined to destroy its party’s storied legacy, as well as its own ability ever to win another race.

The DNC is pursuing a wholesale, wrecking-ball destruction of everything that made people want to vote Democratic in the first place, and to send money to Democratic candidates. It trashes its heritage of speaking up for marginalized groups; for the concerns of communities of color; for unionized workers; for cops and teachers and firefighters; for ordinary Americans who struggle to pay bills; people who, as Democratic candidate and later President Bill Clinton used to say, “work hard and play by the rules.”

How a party can burn up so visibly, and so readily, so much of what we used to call “political capital”?

There is a revolution brewing in New York City and its boroughs, and it just may show a shift that can transform the nation.

New leaders are arising, who simply cannot call themselves Democrats.

This is due to self-inflicted wounds by that party, in the form of lunatic and corrupt policies, and critical abandonments from 2021-present.

Lunatic polices? Here are some:

Support the rights of gay and lesbian people, and of other sexual minorities, not to face legal discrimination? Sure; that is a no-brainer. Take that consensus to a bizarre new level, and insist on interjecting biological males into women’s sports, endangering women physically and destroying Title 9 protections; then place biological males into female spaces such as bathrooms and changing rooms, prisons and mental institutions?

Who thought that that policy would have widespread support? What percent of the electorate has that deliverable at the top of its list?

Speak up for legal immigrants to be treated as fairly as anyone else? Absolutely. Those are traditional Democratic values. But champion the ingress to our nation of 15-30 million people who broke our laws in order to be here, and then shower ostentatious benefits upon them — ranging from cash cards to four star midtown NYC hotel stays — that our American elders and veterans and single parents can never afford for themselves?

How can the advisors sitting around the Democratic campaign tables, not game out what we used to call the “optics” of that situation? How does that help any Democrat run and win?

“Defund the Police”? Who thinks that that was a good idea? A winning policy?

Offer guidance in a public health crisis, sure. But force thousands of NYC teachers, cops and firefighters, and city workers of all kinds, to take into their bodies against their will, an experimental injection that everyone sentient now knows can be damaging or sterilizing or lethal? What are the odds that that will work out longterm?

Deny religious exemptions? Really?

There are 36,000 cops in NYC and 19,000 NYPD staff. There are 11,000 firefighters and 4500 EMTs in NYC. There are 77 thousand teachers in NYC. So a total of 147,400 New Yorkers in the front lines of New Yorkers’ lives, and of their kids’ wellbeing, were “mandated” with the experimental injection.

What if they get sick? What if they die? What if they know others who are getting sick and dying?

Who wants to “own” that catastrophe electorally?

The DNC does.

To this day, first responders in NYC who were “mandated”, do not have their jobs back. They do not have due process,. They did not get their day in court. The people on whose bodies the city runs, were betrayed.

Who isn’t sorry? The DNC. Who isn’t offering to “reinstate and compensate” these workers? The DNC’s new star, the “new AOC”, New York State Assembly Member Zohran Mamdani.

He is a poster child for the corruption of the DNC, and its betrayal of first responders and communities of color; traditionally stalwart groups in the Democratic base.

Mamdani is to the manor born. A Bowdoin college graduate, son of the glamorous Indian filmmaker Mira Nair, Mamdani’s family lives in Uganda, where Mandani was recently married. Indian media are reporting this event as a “lavish Uganda wedding bash”. “New York City mayoral frontrunner and current Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani celebrated his recent marriage with a three-day private celebration at his family’s high-security estate in Uganda”, reports DNA_India.

In New York City media, in contrast, Mamdani poses in a hoodie on the subway.

Trust fund millennials in gentrified neighborhoods in New York, are salivating about Mamdani. In a gesture, voting for Mamdani wipes away the guilt of “white privilege”; no matter than he himself is more privileged than almost anyone in New York’s five boroughs.

Mamdani is a true socialist candidate: he offers to make New York life “affordable.” Free transit for all; government-run grocery stores — (which worked so well in the Soviet Union); frozen rents. It is a seductive appeal; New York is expensive; and Mamdani can hope that people under 60 do not remember what socialism actually did to those suffering under its yoke.

His candidacy definitely depends upon no one asking where all the money is going to come from, or noticing that when “the government” pays for it, it is taxpayers who actually pay.

Headlines from Politico to Newsweek are broadcasting the “fact” that Mamdani polled at 50 per cent, far above his competitors. But read the not-so-fine print (as Politico’s and Newsweek’s editors should have done, more carefully):

‘“Our independent poll — the first in this cycle to be offered in four languages and to drill down into national origin and religious denomination — makes one thing clear: Black union households, young Jews, South Asians, East Asians, Latinos, and New Yorkers in every income bracket are all on the same Zohran Mamdani bus, and it’s headed in the direction of the Democratic Party’s future,” said Amit Singh Bagga, the principal of Public Progress Solutions and a veteran of federal, city, and state government.

Bagga’s firm designed and analyzed the poll along with Adam Carlson’s Zenith Research. It was funded through private donations to Bagga, who advised Mamdani’s campaign during the primary on setting up an administration, and was fielded by Verasight.”

So: a poll handpicked the most likely Mamdani voters, left out the likely Mamdani non-supporters, his donors funded it, and legacy media is calling that a win. Both polling and news reporting could not be more corrupt than this.

In contrast to Mamdani and his theatrical structure of institutional alliances, a new generation of very different leaders in New York City, is also running for office. These young men and women had very different life experiences from Mamdani’s. They were not born to wealth or privilege; their families do not live on “lavish estates” in foreign countries.

The corrupt, institutional machine of New York City politics, is not helping them; the legacy media of New York City are not championing them.

Some of these new leaders have walked away from the Democratic party. They have re-registered as Republicans, which is in itself newsworthy. But these are not your grandma’s country club Republicans.

Athena Clarke, a New York City teacher who was “mandated” out of her job when she refused to take the experimental injection, the daughter of immigrants from Jamaica and the West Indies, and a mother of one, is running for city council in Brooklyn’s District 46. (Disclosure: DailyClout.io will run sponsored content from her supporters). She has an BA and an MA in education, specializing in children with disabilities.

For seven years Clarke worked as a tenured teacher in the New York City Department of Education. But in 2021, the city implemented a COVID-19 vaccine mandate. When Ms Clarke refused it, she was terminated from her job, without any court hearing, which is a violation of New York State Education Law.

This trauma led her to decide to run for City Council, and to seek reinstatement for first responders and teachers, among other planks on her platform.

Unlike Mamdani, she is not promising free everything. (One of her slogans is “Stop the Socialists!”)

I interviewed Clarke, and it was a different experience from interviewing a seasoned pol. She spoke from the perspective of a teacher and of a mom. She talked about the kids injured developmentally from being kept out of school for months; children alone in a room, socially isolated, staring at monitors. She talked about how kids with speech disabilities could not learn how to pronounce the sounds “l” or “th” without seeing their teacher’s mouths, which were hidden behind masks.

Her platform has other grassroots concerns. Parental rights is one of them; she is tackling the delicate issue of parents being unaware that children are exposed at public schools to “sensitive content,” often without their consent. She promises to take on the bureaucracy: Brooklyn often simply changes zoning, and imposes drug treatment clinics, homeless shelters, mental health facilities and other problematic institutions into local neighborhoods, especially in lower-income areas, without any local buy-in or approval process. Clarke promises to end that. She will also “reinstate and compensate” the terminated city workers who were “mandated” and who lost their jobs when they refused the vaccine.

Luis Quero is another Brooklyn-born and raised next-generation leader. He is running for Brooklyn City Council, District 38. He is sort of an anti-Mamdani.

His website is startlingly direct. “You just want to get to work without getting stabbed or burned alive”, it reads. “There is no Democratic or Republican way of cleaning the streets,” it notes, quoting legendary New York Mayor Fiorello LaGuardia.

Read the Whole Article

The post Democrats: Winning a Battle but Losing the War appeared first on LewRockwell.

The commute in Campbell, California, collapsed into chaos today (Tuesday) when a plastic trinket—placed by a weekend treasure hunter—was mistaken for the second coming of Guy Fawkes. Winchester Boulevard turned into a no-go zone while patrol cruisers, armored vans, and an inquisitive news chopper circled the scene.

Parents ran late, businesses lost customers, and every weary taxpayer footed the bill for a few lumbering hours that felt like a bad rehearsal of Homeland Security Theater.

I happened to be stuck in it. As the O’Learys claim to be an adventuring clan, I took my children on a quest while Mom was at the dentist. It turns out that the trip to the coin-op carwash a few klicks down the road was more than we bargained for.

I told Jack Callahan about our misadventure— “twenty minutes, seven side streets, and two cranky kids just to scrub road dust and a bunch of bird crap off the Yukon” —and he barked the laugh of a man who has shoveled more bureaucratic folly than snow.

“Son,” he said over a quick Zoom, clanking a coffee mug on his desk, “they closed a principal artery because some gadgeteer dropped a glorified Tupperware? That’s not safety. That’s institutional hypochondria!”

Jack has also watched government balloon in the post-Eisenhower years. There’s an industrial complex that never knows when to stand down. Whose folks haven’t regaled them about the drills of the 1950s and 60s—kids ducking under desks, generals measuring fallout with slide rules, mothers praying the Cubans would blink first in the nuclear standoff?

Back then, Jack argued, they served a palpable dread: Soviet warheads. Today, the danger is a nylon box with a smiley-face sticker.

Across the nation, bomb squads sprint to geocaches with the reflex of Pavlov’s dog, racking up overtime and wear on six-figure robots. Technicians detonated a pipe-shaped cache near a middle school in Frisco, Colorado. Officers in Murfreesboro, Tennessee, x-rayed a “Pipe Bomb Geocache” in a Home Depot lot. Ohio wardens evacuated hikers for a plastic LocknLock that did nothing but hide a logbook.

Each scare drains finite manpower. Colorado again: Summit County’s sheriff lamented “a significant amount of time and valuable resources” burned on harmless PVC.

Last week in Door County, Wisconsin, deputies cleared an entire park for a GPS game piece.

Consider. A single response truck runs nearly $200k—forget sirens and strobing lights. Regional squads log 40–60 callouts per year, and Santa Clara County’s unit stands ready 24/7 for three neighboring counties. Meanwhile, local police budgets groan under the bloat of overtime—New York alone projects $507 million in uniform OT this fiscal year.

Jack’s verdict: “They buy a bazooka to swat a housefly, then pass the invoice to the housefly.”

The Founders believed liberty survives only where citizens and the state maintain proportion. Yet modern officialdom multiplies protocols the way kudzu chokes a fenceline. One errant cache and the default is “cordon-and-search.”

Reflect. During World War II, explosives were shipped across the continent without paralyzing traffic. Today, a plastic box is enough to darken countless traffic lights.

Jack thundered: “We lock down, we clear out, we pay up—yet we never wise up.”

The pattern mirrors Prohibition raids and TSA shoe shuffling: bold headlines first, sheepish footnotes later. Fear becomes currency, and compliance turns into habit.

No one begrudges caution—real threats exist, as Oklahoma City proved in 1995. But prudence must share the stage with perspective. Ground rules already tell geocachers to avoid pipes, military ammo cans, and public transit pylons. Enforcing amateur guidelines would cost pennies compared with mobilizing the paramilitary.

Callahan frames it in boxing terms: “Government should fight in its weight class. Right now, it’s shadow-boxing ghosts, burning stamina while real crooks pick pockets in the bleachers.”

His prescription is surgical: Dispatchers must first cross-reference geocache databases; Hobbyists should plainly label containers; Open civilian hotlines to resolve benign sightings before alarms spread like prairie fire.

Today’s fiasco was a bureaucratic belly flop, not a public triumph. It showcased an apparatus that mistakes activity for achievement, then invoices Ordinary Joe for its blunders. Each lockdown chips away at civic patience, the same way price controls bred gas lines and sour distrust.

Jack tells me he’s going to raise one up tonight—Bud Heavy bottle, label out—and toast to the folks like me who were stuck in their noontime commute: “May your engines stay cool, may your kids forgive the delay, and may your public servants learn that discernment is cheaper than spectacle.”

After all, the republic Jack’s ancestors bled for was forged on measured courage, not reflexive dread. Until our institutions remember that distinction, every plastic lunchbox will parade as Armageddon.

At the same time, the real business of the nation waits at the barricade, honking its horn.

This article was originally published on The O’Leary Review.

The post How a $5 Plastic Box Cost Taxpayers Thousands: My 20-minute Nightmare on Winchester Boulevard appeared first on LewRockwell.

This article was written by my father before the implementation of the 2nd amendment.

The UN’s Arms Trade Treaty which covers everything from small arms to battle tanks, combat aircraft and warships – came into force on 24 December 2014. This treaty has not been ratified by our Congress but had the support of our Secretary of State, John Kerry who signed it and Our president at that time, who without expressly mentioning the treaty, said in a speech at the UN that all nations “must meet our responsibility to observe and enforce international norms.” The problem with that statement and this treaty is that we the people aren’t in control of what those ‘international norms’ are and as we have seen time and time again, those international norms might be detrimental to our country.

Many preppers and 2nd Amendment proponents believe that the Arms Trade Treaty will first lead to registration of all firearms and when that happens, historically the next step is confiscation through some means. Technically, no treaty can be put into action in the United States unless it has been ratified by a 2/3 majority of the senate. This fact is what most people cite when they are trying to refute any legitimate concerns about the UN Arms Trade Treaty or any other treaty’s potential effect on our country. This sounds well and good and serves to placate some, but for this fail-safe to have any weight you would first need to have a government that followed the letter of the constitution and additionally, that government would need to follow the wishes of the citizens they are representing.

Our government has proven time and time again that following the constitution is simply not something they feel they have to do when it stands in their way. For example, the senate has never voted on the Kyoto Protocol but that hasn’t stopped the EPA from enacting rules complying with the main goals of that treaty. Coal plants are being shut down left and right while the US and China agreed in 2014 to let China keep growing their output of carbon emissions (with coal power plants) until 2030. There are many examples of policies that are enacted that fall well outside the bounds of Constitutional limits on power but that doesn’t stop our representatives does it? On any issue there is more brainpower spent on finding ways around the Constitution than actually following it with the seeming goal of every single facet of law being finally decided by the Supreme Court. It’s as if in our society, the rules we decided long ago to set for ourselves are only as good as the interpretations of people today and if every single thing can be challenged (and in some cases changed), we don’t really have a Constitution at all. What we have is a framework for legal arguments that only establishes a baseline which can be over ruled completely by a simple majority of ideology on the bench.

As for a government that listens to their constituents, that long gone relic of thought is promised by every single person running for office. “I feel your pain” The truth of the matter is that in this day and age, every politician is a benefactor of the same special interests. There are no democrat and republican sides whenever both are receiving money from the same companies. The elected politicians, by overwhelming majority do not care what you say or want because they don’t answer to you. Their actions directly contradict election results, polls and public outcry. The 2014 mid-term elections  held should have sent a very strong signal to the leadership of both parties that the country wasn’t on-board with the policies of the current administration and the direction of affairs with the Congress, however; Obamacare and Amnesty both remain intact without so much as a whimper from our newly elected majority who promised for years to repeal it as soon as they were ‘in power’. To add insult to injury, the Republicans just released a 1 trillion budget proposal just over 24 hours before a procedural vote on it knowing that nobody would have time to read it. Same tricks but a different face is behind the podium. Why should we expect anything different from what we have been seeing?

Do you really feel that there is anything ‘your party’ is going to do to stop elements of this treaty from being implemented if it is in their best interests?

What’s so wrong with simply registering all guns?

What’s the harm in simply registering you say? It makes sense that government would want to know who has guns, so they can ensure that bad people don’t have them. You can’t argue with that logic can you? Well yes I can try. Registration will only be done by law-abiding people. The criminals they will try to get you to believe this registration would stop would never turn themselves or their guns in. If that were true, why wouldn’t criminals be lining up a police offices every day because we do have laws already, don’t we? How is this not obvious to everyone? I maintain that it is obvious to the people who are pushing for any restriction and by that I am referring to registration,  of our 2nd amendment rights.

Do guns kill people? Yes they do, but deaths by guns are a small fraction of the total deaths in the US each year. If you want to know who really kills people you have to look at governments historically.

Yes, you read that right. Governments are responsible for more deaths of their citizens in the 20th century than any other unnatural cause. It is called Democide and is been documented by R. J. Rummel, formerly of the University of Hawaii Political Science Department. He writes:

Most probably near 170,000,000 people have been murdered in cold-blood by governments, well over three-quarters by absolutist regimes. The most such killing was done by the Soviet Union (near 62,000,000 people), the communist government of China is second (near 35,000,000), followed by Nazi Germany (almost 21,000,000), and Nationalist China (some 10,000,000). Lesser megamurderers include WWII Japan, Khmer Rouge Cambodia, WWI Turkey, communist Vietnam, post-WWII Poland, Pakistan, and communist Yugoslavia. The most intense democide was carried out by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, where they killed over 30 percent of their subjects in less than four years.

The best predictor of this killing is regime power. The more arbitrary power a regime has, the less democratic it is, and the more likely it will kill its subjects or foreigners. The conclusion is that power kills, absolute power kills absolutely.

But we live in a democracy in the United States and we elect our representatives. We have a rule of law and nothing like the atrocities you mention above would ever happen here. Really? I certainly hope not and so it is with much interest that I have and will be keeping track of what goes on after December 24th and into the future on this topic.

But Mr. Rummel’s statement has weight in historical precedence and is alarming when looked at from the context of where we are as a country today. One could argue that our regime has an increasingly disturbing amount of ‘arbitrary power’. That is power that they have assumed that is outside of the Constitution and the really fun part is they keep giving themselves more of it every day. Some of this power was enacted by law of course, but it is power nonetheless and it never decreases, it only becomes more vast. From the Patriot Act, to NSA Spying, to treaties with foreign nations, harassment of political parties, to illegal searches, illegal detainment without cause, to killing people without a trial and just yesterday they passed a bill which grants the government and law enforcement “unlimited access to the communications of every American”. How much power is that?

Read the Whole Article

The post Next Step Is Confiscation Through Some Means: A Response to the 2nd Amendment Critique appeared first on LewRockwell.