Lew Rockwell Institute

The Germ Hypothesis has been one of the most successful DECEPTIONS ever pulled off throughout the world.

At it’s core is the Perversion of Science.

In this Part ONE of a two-part series by Drs Sam Bailey she presents in video form an essay requested by Vera Sharov concerning the perversion of science and provides an excellent overview of how the “pandemic” was staged.

(In many ways this presentation is a great summary of her and her husband, Dr Mark Bailey’s, latest book, The Final Pandemic which I also highly recommend.)

Vera Sharov, of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, is a Holocaust survivor and tireless champion of protecting the rights of human research subjects in clinical trials – and removing fear from the world.

She is preparing a companion book to her documentary, “Never Again is Now Global” which will have over 20 authors contributing chapters, of which this essay by the Bailey’s will be one.

Please watch Sam’s Part One video, HERE (19 minute).

To learn more about Vera Sharov, her mission and watch her excellent documentary, “Never Again is Now Global” , please go HERE.

Highly Recommended! 

The post Why Not Puncture the Essential Fear Weapon? Unmasking the Viral Deception – Part One appeared first on LewRockwell.

As we now know the Perversion of Science was recently used to create tyranny around the world.

However, there’s now a World Wide Movement with many contributing to Never Let This Happen Again!

A major force in this movement is Vera Sharov of the Alliance for Human Research Protection, who’s a Holocaust survivor and tireless champion of protecting the rights of human research subjects in clinical trials – and removing fear from the world.

Vera created the excellent documentary, “Never Again is Now Global” which I urge everyone to watch and share.

Vera is currently creating a companion book to her documentary and asked the Bailey’s to contribute a chapter.

This is Part Two by Dr Sam Bailey of that chapter in video form.

Part One can be viewed here. The full chapter by the Bailey’s can now be Downloaded for Free, HERE. 

How did this DECEPTION come to be and WHY has the Viral Model BELIEF SYSTEM been so persistent in our world?

To address that I’ll end with a quote from Vera Sharov:

Vera is one of a growing number of committed activists who are changing this worn out model of FEAR by educating people and removing the perversion of science so that we may never be deceived again.

The post Viruses Are Not A Scientific Concept But Rather A Belief System – Unmasking the Viral Deception – Part Two appeared first on LewRockwell.

To justify the State of Israel’s current indiscriminate killing of women and children in Gaza, the Israeli regime’s supporters generally put forward a one-line explanation: “Israel has a right to defend itself.” This simple-minded incantation is deployed as if it is the final word. It is meant to communicate this idea: “some people from Gaza killed some Israeli citizens in October 2023. Therefore, the Israeli state can morally and legally kill any person in Gaza indiscriminately.”

Women and children are being starved as a result of Israel’s bombing campaign? It doesn’t matter because “Israel has a right to defend itself.” Many of the people targeted had nothing to do with the October 2023 attack? It doesn’t matter because “Israel has a right to defend itself.”

In modern warfare, where modern weaponry means entire cities are leveled and whole populations can be wiped off the map, this sort of thinking is despicable. Tel Aviv is hardly alone in this sort of thinking, however. Those who fund the Israeli carpet bombing—the American state—has a long history of behaving this way. In Japan, Korea, Vietnam, and Iraq, Americans routinely targeted noncombatants relying on lazy claims that amount to little more than saying that Japanese children deserved to be firebombed because they were born Japanese. Did those children have anything to do with the attack on Pearl Harbor? It doesn’t matter because “America has a right to defend itself.”

As the historian Ralph Raico points out in his lecture “The World at War,”Americans had not yet become so morally depraved before the Second World War. Referring to American glee over the firebombing of Tokyo, which Robert McNamara says may have killed 100,000 Japanese civilians in one night, Raico says:

I can’t imagine anyone in America in 1914 who would have greeted with joy the destruction of a Japanese city and the death of a hundred thousand people. You ask anybody in America. You ask Theodore Roosevelt himself! That old sissy probably would faint. You ask anybody, “Would you will the total annihilation of a Japanese city?” “What are you talking about? Are you crazy? What do you mean annihilation of a city? What are we, Tamerlane? What are we, Genghis Khan?”

In the twenty-first century, however, it doesn’t matter how many cities we obliterate because we have apparently moved beyond the idea of morality in war. There are no limits because “Israel/America has a right to defend itself.”

In the past, however, more civilized Europeans attempted in a variety of ways to restrain states during wars. Ideologically and philosophically, one of the more influential ideals for conduct in warfare has been so-called Just War Theory. One notable aspect of Just War Theory is that it limits which conflicts can be considered morally defensible while also limiting the behavior of states while fighting a “just war.” Many of the details behind Just War Theory vary over time, but International Relations scholar Vincent Ferrara summarizes it this way:

1. A just war can only be waged as a last resort. All non-violent options must be exhausted before the use of force can be justified.
2. A war is just only if it is waged by a legitimate authority. Even just causes cannot be served by actions taken by individuals or groups who do not constitute an authority sanctioned by whatever the society and outsiders to the society deem legitimate.
3. A just war can only be fought to redress a wrong suffered. For example, self-defense against an armed attack is always considered to be a just cause (although the justice of the cause is not sufficient–see the next point). Further, a just war can only be fought with “right” intentions: the only permissible objective of a just war is to redress the injury.
4. A war can only be just if it is fought with a reasonable chance of success. Deaths and injury incurred in a hopeless cause are not morally justifiable.
5. The ultimate goal of a just war is to re-establish peace. More specifically, the peace established after the war must be preferable to the peace that would have prevailed if the war had not been fought.
6. The violence used in the war must be proportional to the injury suffered. States are prohibited from using force not necessary to attain the limited objective of addressing the injury suffered.
7. The weapons used in war must discriminate between combatants and non-combatants. Civilians are never permissible targets of war, and every effort must be taken to avoid killing civilians. The deaths of civilians are justified only if they are unavoidable victims of a deliberate attack on a military target.

It is also notable that many advocates of Just War Theory state that all of these conditions must be met for a war to be just. That is, once “our side” violates even one of these conditions, “our side” has given up its moral legitimacy as a belligerent.

Does Anyone Actually Care about Just War Theory?

Looking over this rather extensive list, many will say to themselves: “wow that’s a long list. In fact, it’s much too long, and if we stuck to that list virtually no war would be considered a just war.”

That, of course, is the idea. Just War Theory strongly suggests that nearly modern wars are conducted in a way that is morally indefensible.

Does anyone actually care about Just War Theory, though? In an era when one’s morality is more dictated by nationalism and political ideology, rather than by one’s religious convictions, we find that not even Christians seem to take this seriously.

In spite of the fact that, historically speaking, Just War Theory was central to Christian political thinking, many modern Christians are likely to regard it as good “in theory” but not really worth the risk if it means “our side” is less likely to win.

On Radio Rothbard this week, Eric Sammons, the editor-in-chief of the longstanding Catholic magazine Crisis, joins me to discuss the state of foreign-policy thinking among Catholics. Sammons explains how, even though Just War Theory continues to be explicitly endorsed by the Catholic hierarchy, the Catholic rank and file either doesn’t know about it, or doesn’t care.

As Sammons explains, Catholics have become beholden to modern political ideologies that are quite in conflict with the historical and traditional political ideals of their own church.

Even the old Catholic Left, which had been so reliably antiwar during the mid-twentieth century, as largely disappeared as the American Left doubled down on supporting whatever new war Obama, Biden, and Clinton foisted upon the American people, and on Washington’s foreign victims.

As Sammons notes, however, there is reason for hope. Among conservative Catholics there is a rising skepticism of the regime’s prowar narratives and a decided lack of enthusiasm about the state’s ongoing calls for ever more support for American intervention across the globe. Many younger Christians appear to be less gullible that their parents and grandparents who simply deferred to supporting whatever the American state said was the next great military crusade.

Listen to the podcast:

The post Is There Such a Thing as a “Just War” in the Modern World? appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes John F. Miller:

Dear Lew:

This news item provides a ringing endorsement of how private enterprise and community focused volunteerism offer alternative remedies to the ever failed government solutions that in many ways contributed to these unprecedented fires.

The post Cali Homes Saved By Private Fire Hydrants & Community Fire Brigades appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, John Frahm.

Infowars

The post Corporation=Corpse appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, Greg Privette.

The Federalist

The post Just in case Canada’s euthanasia laws weren’t already bad enough appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes Ginny Garner:

Lew,

The Supreme Court has ruled Tik Tok operations can be banned in the US. Tik Tok posts uncensored videos exposing the bombing in Gaza and the genocide and starvation of the Palestinians. The ADL has been a big cheerleader of banning Tik Tok in the US. Tik Tok also posts uncensored videos by residents in California, North Carolina, Hawaii and Ohio who are victims of the wildfires, hurricanes and chemical spills who have been exposing the truth of these disasters and the incompetence, corruption and neglect by the state. Will the Trump administration enforce the ban?

See here.

The post Supreme Court Allows Tik Tok Ban; Will Trump Enforce It? appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, John Frahm.

The American Conservative

The post Just Say No to Nuclear War appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, Gail Appel.

John Leake

The post The World’s Largest Lithium Battery Fire appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, Gail Appel.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World

The post The Coup D’ Etat is Unfolding in Plain Sight appeared first on LewRockwell.

Click Here:

Ben Bartee

The post On Ayn Rand’s Curious Letter to Her Niece and Ideological Totalitarianism appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, John Smith. 

Middle East Eye

The post British Jews explain their turn away from Israel and Zionism appeared first on LewRockwell.

Thanks, Andy Thomas.

American Reformer

The post The Secret Treachery of the Pro-Life Establishment appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes Brian Dunaway:

Hanlon’s Razor states “never attribute to malice what can be attributed to incompetence.” Its usage is so ubiquitous it has almost become trite. Perhaps it is the times, but I find this “truth” to be less and less convincing.

Setting that aside, this testimony screams the truth of the superiority of private over public services:

Blue State Blues: California Is a Third World Failed State

The post appeared first on LewRockwell.

The post Trump’s 2nd Admin, Cali Aid, Tik-Tok Ban, Journalist Assault – Friday Media Roundup appeared first on LewRockwell.

RPI’s Daniel McAdams and Chris Rossini separate the news from the propaganda in this discussion of the REAL news of the week.

The post Trump’s 2nd Admin, Cali Aid, Tik-Tok Ban, Journalist Assault – Friday Media Roundup appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes Ginny Garner:

Lew,

President elect Trump wants to create a new agency called the External Revenue Service to collect his new proposed tariffs. A new government agency! Does DOGE (Elton Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy) know about this? Currently the US Customs and Border Protection agency collects tariffs. Will Trump eliminate the IRS? The main source of revenues for the federal government was tariffs until the income tax (taxes on wages and earnings). Will Trump cut the income tax? Or is this all about more taxes and more government?

See here.

The post Trump To Create External Revenue Service appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes  Gail Appel:

It isn’t a “ theory”. It’s a six plus decades plan in the making.

During a 1958 interview, Aldous  Huxley laid out the entire sequence of events we’ve since experienced to Mike Wallace. Wallace “ humored” Huxley as one often does when dealing with an eccentric child. Huxley was so lost in his train of thought, he ignored Wallace’s hectoring. The most chilling line in the interview was Huxley’s . “ It’s happening much faster than I could have imagined”.

More disturbing still was Huxley’s 1961 BBC interview after “ Brave New World Revisited” was published. “ I think “ Brave New World”  has been used as a playbook”.

The unintended consequences of a brilliant, fantastical mind.

The post Bone-Chilling “Conspiracy Theory” Emerges as California Burns appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes Gail Appel:

This must be addressed by Trump from his bully pulpit during a press conference while surrounded by those who witnessed the horrific murder of Rosanne Boyland.

An American. A human being. There must be justice!

The post Shocking New Video Shows J6 Protester Shot in Face by Police, Beaten with a Stick as She Died on US Capitol Steps appeared first on LewRockwell.

Writes Ginny Garner.:

Lew,

No, you’re not dreaming. President elect Trump, whose cabinet choices are arguably 100% Zionist, has shared a video on social media saying Netanyahu conned the US into war with Iraq and is pushing the US into a war with Iran. The video features an impassioned Jeffrey Sachs who is fed up with Israel controlling American foreign policy. What’s going on here?

Link.

The post Trump Shares Video Saying Netanyahu Conned US into War With Iraq and is Pushing for War in Iran appeared first on LewRockwell.