Lew Rockwell Institute

More than 30 years ago, Congress enacted the President John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection Act of 1992. Enacted in the wake of Oliver Stone’s movie JFK, which posited that the Kennedy assassination was a regime-change operation on the part of the U.S. national-security establishment, the law mandated that all the assassination-related records of the Pentagon, the CIA, the Secret Service, the FBI, and other federal agencies be released to the public. Having succeeded in keeping their assassination-related records secret for almost 30 years, they didn’t like that at all.

Today — more than 60 years after the assassination — the CIA continues to keep thousands of its assassination-related records secret. Its justification? You guessed it: “national security,” the two most powerful and meaningless words in the American political lexicon. CIA officials maintain, with straight faces, that if those still-secret assassination-related records were released, the United States would fall into the ocean, be taken over by communists, or have its “national security” endangered in some other silly way.

How in the world can “national security” be threatened by the release of records that are more than 60 years old, regardless of what definition is placed on that nebulous term? Indeed, how can any American really believe this nonsense? They obviously take Americans for dupes.

It is a virtual certainty that those still-secret records contain circumstantial evidence that further confirms criminal culpability on the part of the CIA and the Pentagon in the assassination of President Kennedy. After all, the CIA knows that that is precisely what most everyone is thinking with respect to the continued secrecy of those records. Why would the CIA want to leave people thinking that? One reason: Because it’s better to have people thinking that those records contain incriminating evidence rather than knowing that they do.

What could the CIA be hiding with those still-secret records? The answer necessarily has to be speculative in nature, but my hunch is that some of the still-secret information deals with Mexico City, where the accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald was supposed to have met with Cuban and Soviet officials.

In the immediate aftermath of the assassination, it is obvious that everything went wrong with the Mexico City part of the assassination plot. For example, there were audiotapes that supposedly contained Oswald’s voice and then suddenly there were no such audiotapes. There was a photograph of Oswald except that it was a photograph of someone else.

Why was Mexico City an important part of the assassination plot? As I detail in my newest book on the assassination, An Encounter with Evil: The Abraham Zapruder Story, an essential part of the assassination plot was to frame a communist. This was the height of the Cold War, when most everyone hated and feared the Reds. By framing a communist, the national-security establishment could rest assured that Americans would be reluctant to come to Oswald’s defense or believe anything he said.

Mexico City played an important role in this endeavor. Oswald was ordered to travel to Mexico City, where he was to meet with both Cuban and Soviet officials. In that way, the plotters could definitely tie the future assassin to the Soviet and Cuban communists.

Why would Oswald obey such orders? Because he was an operative for U.S. intelligence. Intelligence operatives follow orders, especially when they’re told that they are part of an intelligence operation.

In fact, in one of its first meetings, Earl Warren, the head of the Warren Commission, told the commission that there was highly discomforting evidence that Oswald was, in fact, an intelligence operative. Once the CIA and the FBI, which, of course, would never lie about such a thing, assured the commission that such wasn’t the case, Warren ordered that the meeting be kept top-secret and never revealed to the American people.

When he was serving in the military, Oswald became fluent in the Russian language. That is not an easy thing to do. It takes language experts, which the U.S. government has. That’s the only way Oswald could have learned to speak fluent Russian while he was in the military.

There is also New Orleans, where Oswald had moved from Dallas prior to his trip to Mexico City. In New Orleans, Oswald spent a lot of effort building up his “pro-communist” persona, especially with the help of an anti-Castro group called the DRE.

Immediately after the assassination, the DRE sent out a press release informing the nation that Oswald was a communist. There is one big important thing about the DRE that the nation did not know and would not know for several decades. It was a CIA-funded and CIA-supervised group. Thus, it was actually the CIA that wanted the nation to know that the president had been killed by a Red.

As JFK researcher Jefferson Morley, who first discovered the CIA’s connection to the DRE, has also discovered, the CIA was secretly monitoring Oswald in the months leading up to the assassination, including secretly reading his mail. Why would the CIA be doing that? Because if one is going to frame a person in a very complex murder plot, one has to be certain that the person being framed doesn’t figure out what is going on.

Will the CIA succeed in keeping its assassination-related records secret forever? Given the overwhelming power that the national-security branch has within the federal governmental structure, it’s a virtual certainty that it will succeed. But what difference does it make? The evidence that was released by the JFK Records Act already proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the Kennedy assassination was a national-security state regime-change operation, especially with respect to the fraudulent autopsy that the military conducted on JFK’s body and the fraudulent copy of the Zapruder film that the CIA produced. (See my books The Kennedy Autopsy and An Encounter with Evil: The Abraham Zapruder Story.) The CIA’s still-secret assassination-related records would only add more circumstantial evidence to what we already know.

Reprinted with permission from The Future of Freedom Foundation.

The post CIA Secrecy on JFK Points to Criminal Culpability appeared first on LewRockwell.

Starting in 2021, the FDA mounted a misinformation campaign about ivermectin, an inexpensive, Nobel Prize-winning medication that showed promising signs in the early treatment of COVID-19. 

While the death toll from this campaign is difficult to calculate, the impact was far-reaching. The campaign was used as fuel to terminate the employment of doctors who understood the science behind ivermectin, as well as justification for pharmacies to cease filling ivermectin prescriptions when people needed the medication most. 

This war on Ivermectin touched us here at the OP as well. An article we published about a peer-reviewed report, Jagged Little Pill: How Many Lives Could Have Been Saved If We’d ACTUALLY “Followed the Science?” was targeted as ‘disinformation’ and used to downgrade our ranking with advertisers, costing us untold revenue.

It was used to discredit everyone who even dared to mention it. Users or those who wondered if it might be viable were treated with mockery and defamation.  Famously, Joe Rogan took it when he came down with Covid and recovered remarkably quickly, only to be scorned endlessly online for using “horse paste.”

Courageous doctors fought back.  

In 2022, doctors filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over the agencies’ unlawful attempts to block the use of ivermectin for treatment of COVID-19.

“We’re suing the FDA for lying to the public about ivermectin,” said Dr. Bowden, a plaintiff in the case. 

The complaint directly cites US laws, including the provision that the FDA “may not interfere with the authority of a health care provider to prescribe or administer any legally marked device to a patient for any condition or disease within a legitimate health care practitioner-patient relationship.” 

On Thursday, the court ruled against the FDA and mandated the removal of all previous social media posts that specifically addressed the use of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19. The posts have started to come down, including a popular one titled: “Should I take ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19? No.” 

Americans are waking up. 

Dr. Peter McCullough, America’s leading cardiologist and outspoken critic of the healthcare system’s response to COVID, said in a recent interview that in waging its revolting “horse de-wormer” propaganda campaign against ivermectin, the FDA systematically harmed the American people and should be held criminally and civilly liable for its malfeasance. 

Early treatment of respiratory illness like COVID with ivermectin is a critical tool in the medical arsenal. Dr. Peter McCullough explains: 

“Early intervention at the first sign of illness is critical to avoid a hospital visit. I have always wished patients could keep critical medications like antibiotics and Ivermectin on-hand so they can act fast; a recommendation whose importance was underscored by the drug restrictions during COVID.  This is now a dream come true from The Wellness Company.” 

How to get IVERMECTIN and the other effective drugs the FDA tried to ban. 

Escape the FDA propaganda and prepare ahead of time for illness with The Wellness Company’s Contagion Emergency Kits. Designed by elite doctors, including Dr. McCullough mentioned above, these prescription kits have emerged as a key piece of every household’s emergency preparedness plan, saving Americans thousands of dollars in unplanned hospital visits. 

After the last debacle, I’ll always keep critical life-saving medications like Ivermectin on hand. It’s all about the money and new drugs that make billions of dollars for pharmaceutical companies. If those drugs have negative side effects or don’t work? *shrug* They made their money.

Be ready for the next emergency and sleep with peace of mind. The Wellness Company’s Contagion Emergency Kit is the gold standard in preparation. It contains four life-saving medications: Ivermectin, Z-pack, Hydroxychloroquine, and Budesonide.   

1. IVERMECTIN: The Nobel-prize-winning medicine demonized as “horse paste” by the FDA. 

1. HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE: An antiviral that has been used for 50 years for the treatment of various diseases was suddenly banned when Trump endorsed it.  

1. GENERIC Z-PAK: One of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in history, it has promise in treating COVID-19.  

1. BUDESONIDE: This became restricted due to supply chain shortages from Big Pharma’s outsourcing. 

The Contagion Emergency Kit also includes a nebulizer and guidebook to aid in the safe use of these life-saving medications.  

This kit is prescription-only – you can’t find it in any store or pharmacy. Simply fill out a short questionnaire after purchase and a trusted Wellness Company doctor will confirm your suitability and issue your prescription Contagion Emergency Kit. 

The Wellness Company and their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust. I’ve written about my experiences with them here.

SAVE 15% OFF A CONTAGION EMERGENCY KIT WITH CODE “FDA” AT CHECKOUT 

Reprinted with permission from The Organic Prepper.

The post The FDA Stops Its War on Ivermectin appeared first on LewRockwell.

This time Peter tackles Jerome Powell’s speech from Wednesday, in which he announced that the Fed is holding the federal funds rate between 5.25 and 5.5%. He also briefly discusses Bitcoin’s pullback and the media’s lies about Donald Trump. 

On Powell’s announcement, several commodities surged in price, with silver, gold, and copper performing especially well. Peter sees this as a repudiation of Powell’s messaging:

“I think we’re on the verge of the biggest bull market in commodities since the 1970s. Of course, this flies in the face of Powell claiming that inflation is going to go back down to two percent. There’s no chance that inflation is going to go back down to two percent! All the data shows that inflation is on the way up. Plus, if you understand what inflation is, it has nowhere to go but up.”

A hotter-than-expected Producer Price Index (PPI) report last week also contradicts Powell, with the PPI increasing from last month by more than twice the most conservative estimates. The PPI, in addition to a recently announced 13% federal deficit increase, does not bode well for the economy:

“This is why we have inflation. It’s driving prices higher. All this money is being spent. How can it not bid up prices? This is why the Fed is not only going to taper the QT [quantitative tightening] program but go back to quantitative easing because government spending is going ballistic. And all of it is stoking the fires for inflation. … There’s no downward pressure from five and a quarter, five and a half percent interest rates. Those rates are still too low.”

Peter expects rate cuts in the future. Every political force incentivizes the Fed to cut rates soon:

“The Fed is cutting rates come hell or high water. It doesn’t matter what the data is. The Fed is going to cut rates because the country is broke. They’re not cutting rates because they won the war against inflation: they lost that war. They’re cutting rates because they have to avoid a financial crisis— a banking crisis. They want to try to reelect Joe Biden. They want to try to save the government from having to default and cut social security and cut Medicare, and so everything’s going to be cut through inflation.”

Powell’s dovish remarks are a textbook case of the Fed’s inability to unwind its policies. Once it starts manipulating the dollar, it can’t go back:

“Bernanke— in 2009, when the Fed just started to increase the balance sheet— said that, ‘After the emergency, we’re going to bring it right back down to where we started. We’re not going to keep any of the bonds that we bought, because we’re not a banana republic. We don’t monetize government debt.’ Well, now you have Jerome Powell saying, ‘We are a banana republic. We do monetize debt because we want to maintain an ample balance sheet.’”

The one thing Powell got right is that rising wages are a symptom of inflation, not its cause:

“If wages are going up, that’s a sign that there’s still an inflation problem. … It’s like when you take your temperature with a thermometer and you know you’re sick. The thermometer is not making you sick. You’re sick because there’s something wrong with you. The thermometer is simply allowing you to confirm that you’re sick.”

The Fed’s inability to handle inflation has sentenced the economy to a grim fate:

“We haven’t experienced anything like that since the 1970s. The difference is we’re in much worse shape economically than we were in the 1970s, and we don’t have the ability to put out this fire. We’re not going to get another Ronald Reagan. We’re not going to get another Paul Volker, and even if they were there, they couldn’t do what they did back then because of the financial position, the weak position that America now occupies that it didn’t occupy back in 1980. So it’s a whole different ball game, and it’s going to have a very different ending.”

With hopes of rate cuts sparked by this week’s report, more cheap credit will only add fuel to the raging flames of inflation.

This originally appeared on SchiffGold.com.

The post Inflation Bloodbath on the Way appeared first on LewRockwell.

“In terms of the Moscow terror attack, the fact that those who carried out the attack were captured is now causing a huge headache for those who were ultimately responsible.” — The Sirius Report on “X”

You’ve got to ask yourself: really, who seems to hanker more for a red-hot World War Three, “Joe Biden” or Vlad Putin? Since “Joe Biden” is only a figment of American politics, first you’d have to ask: a figment of what? Answer: A figment of our greater intel blob, led, of course, by the Central Intelligence Agency. Which is to say, the blob is our government now; there is no government except the blob. We are the United Blob of America! In Blob We Trust should be printed on our money.

That being the case, blob policy rules. And since deception is one of the blob’s chief duties, we mere sniveling citizens should expect to be deceived at every turn about everything. So, when the blob’s news cut-out, The New York Times, serves up a comprehensive history of the gang known as ISIS-K Monday morning after the Moscow Crocus Concert Hall Massacre, you might suspect that some deception is afoot.

ISIS-K immediately took credit for the Crocus Massacre. K stands for Khorasan, a set of provinces in eastern Iran, leaking over into Afghanistan and Pakistan. ISIS-K supposedly evolved out of the original ISIS that sought to establish an Islamic caliphate out of Iraq and Syria. After Mr. Trump broke it up in 2019, the gang regrouped in K-land, deeper in central Asia. Curiously, this ISIS-K has carried out attacks against Iran, where it lives. Go figure. . . . Its progenitor, the plain old ISIS-no-K was responsible for the horrific Bataclan Theater massacre in Paris, 2015 and the suicide bombing of the Ariana Grande concert at the Manchester Arena, UK, 2017. They’re sort of the Concert-Massacres-R-Us of terror orgs — you really couldn’t find a better patsy for the Crocus op.

Is it as simple as that? Not if you consider Scott Ritter’s theory that the first ISIS was a creation of the CIA, with the mission of ousting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, considered by the blob to be an uber-bad dude, largely for enlisting Russia’s help in ending Syria’s civil war. And if you can actually figure out what Syria’s civil war was about, other than a US blob op to gain control of Syria and its oil, you could win a MacArthur Genius Prize. But you might also ask: did the United Blob of America hire ISIS-K to slaughter 137 Russian civilians Saturday night? And also: did it do so directly or indirectly, through cut-outs?

One blob weakness is that it can’t resist the impulse to telegraph its plans ahead of some dastardly act. Both “Joe Biden” and State Department war-hawk Victoria Nuland verbally signaled the op to blow-up the Nord Stream gas pipelines well before the act. Before “retiring” (or getting cashiered) from State this month, Ms. Nuland warned Russia to expect “some nasty surprises” in the days ahead. Was she fired for opening her big mouth? Now, a photograph has surfaced of one of the captured Crocus perps, Shamsidin Fariduni, posing in the Crocus concert hall date-stamped March 7. A set-up? A deep fake?

In any case, on March 8 the United Blob State Department issued a warning to Russia’s foreign ministry that something wicked was coming their way, and likewise warned our diplomatic personnel to steer clear of concert halls and other public venues. Was the Crocus op already well in motion? And was the blob trying to cover for Ms. Nuland’s big mouth by warning about something that was too late to stop?

Whatever else you think about the Russians, they are not dumb bunnies. You can be sure they are carefully putting together the puzzle pieces, having already been careful to take the suspects alive. They were, incidentally, all in one car driving toward the Ukraine border when apprehended by Russian police. That is being considered “a clue” as to who their handlers are. But then, who is Ukraine’s handler? (Cue: thinking music.)

At least one of them — Fariduni — confessed that his gang received all their instructions over a Telegram social media channel. The gang, by the way, were all natives of Tajikistan, a former Soviet republic. Its population is 98 percent Muslim, around 97 percent of them Sunni and 3 percent Shia. Neighboring Iran is militantly Shia, for what it’s worth. The four Crocus perps were living as immigrant workers in Russia. How hard would it be to track who was the proprietor of the alleged Telegram messaging site that offered payment and sent orders to the perps? I’m guessing that would not be so difficult.

The United Blob sent lavish condolences to President Putin on Sunday. We’re so sorry. . . boo-hoo. . . . The directorate of the CIA was awash in crocodile tears, I’m sure. Russia was already busy answering Ukraine’s attempted Belgorod incursion of the previous week by turning off the lights in Kharkov. Meanwhile, Polish, French, and German regular army troops have moved directly by rail and air inside Ukraine to Cherkassy, south of Kiev. The mental defectives running Poland, France, and Germany seem avid for NATO to jump with both feet into ground action in Ukraine, that is, go directly to war with Russia. It’s hard to imagine an act with a potentially worse outcome for NATO, for Europe, and, by extension, for Western Civ. Despite all their posturing, Euroland’s armies could not be less prepared to go up against Russia on the Ukraine battlefield, and are therefore begging for an epic ass-kicking. They’ve already sacrificed their industrial economies at the United Blob’s bidding, so why not just get Europe’s ticket punched for an express trip back to the 11th century?

How about “Joe Biden,” front-man for the United Blob of America? What’s in it for “him?” We might surmise that the “Joe Biden” re-election campaign seeks a big, fat, juicy major distraction from its so-far pathetic effort to keep a near-mummy in the White House. Well, how about that World War they’ve been itchin’ for? Plus, they probably calculate, it’d be great for business! Besides, considering the poll numbers, this might just be the blob’s last stand, since they know as soon as Mr. Trump gets back in the White House (if the blob can’t manage to kill him first) the words “You’re fired!” will echo so thunderously between Foggy Bottom and Judiciary Square that every last critter in the DC Swamp will light out for the territories to avoid the prosecutions sure to follow.

Reprinted with permission from Kunstler.com.

The post In Blob We Trust appeared first on LewRockwell.

I could not help thinking about the current state of the Church in America while watching the emotionally powerful movie Cabrini, just released by Angel Studios. The archbishop she dealt with in New York seemed to me to be a caricature of the prelates who are lions within the flock and lambs outside of it. I am sure the lions appreciate the variation of style. You can browbeat the more conservative sections of the Church ad intra but can be meek and mild ad extra to the powers that be.

It is a consolation to me to think that while Catholics in America at least recognize the name of Mother Cabrini, not very many would be able to come up with the name of the bishop with whom she dueled. While I presume that there was some artistic license in the presentation of the drama of the first part of St. Francesca Cabrini’s ministry in America, an elision of dates and figures, I would like to see the reaction of many of our prelates as they saw the film.

The screenplay has a symbolic gesture that reveals many layers of meaning. The corrupt mayor of New York berates a timid archbishop and then offers him a drink. His Grace is slow to drink it, and His Honor doubles down the insult and says, “You’re an Irishman, bottoms up,” or something to that effect. At that point another man might have been tempted to throw the drink at the mayor or just walk out; but the cowed archbishop meekly drinks up and then, with a frustrated, weak-man’s bravado, slams the glass down on the mayor’s desk.

When Mother Cabrini goes to the mayor after some ruffians attempt to burn down her hospital in the midst of its remodeling, His Honor is unable to make her afraid. He then offers her a drink, which she accepts and takes up without need of bullying. She had won the mayor’s respect, and the audience’s, of course, by the confrontation. Her lack of reluctance quaffing the whiskey was a symbolic difference between how she operated and how her ordinary did.

Undeniably, Mother Cabrini was a forceful personality and was not inclined to docile acceptance of the course of least resistance. There is a clerical legend around Cleveland that our Archbishop Hoban (honorary archbishop), who knew the great woman from Chicago, had said that saints are supposed to be in Heaven because they are hell to live with on earth, or something to that effect. The lady had a way with clerics.

Read the Whole Article

The post Mother Cabrini and Deaconesses appeared first on LewRockwell.

I moved away from home when I was fourteen to train at one of the most demanding gymnastics clubs in the country. In 1986 I became the U.S. National Champion.

But this title came with a heavy price. I trained forty hours a week and subsisted on a forced starvation diet. I was publicly berated by my coaches for gaining a quarter pound. I practiced on a broken ankle for two years. But I kept going.

Finally, beaten down to the point of suicidal ideation, I moved on from the sport and built a life outside of the gym. I started working at Levi’s in 1999 as an entry level marketing assistant and by 2008 I became a vice president. Despite my achievements, the coaching abuse continued to haunt me.

In my attempt to make sense of what I’d endured as a child, I wrote a memoir called Chalked Up (2008). At the time, it was the only first-person account of the abusive training environment in gymnastics. And it included the first public accusation of sexual assault by the 1980’s Team USA coach, Don Peters.

Former teammates and USA Gymnastics leaders dismissed my story as that of a bitter ex-gymnast just trying to cash in. I was harassed by the CEO of USA Gymnastics (USAG) with bullying voicemails.

The gymnastics community was trying to sweep the misconduct and crimes under the rug to maintain their lucrative corporate sponsors. Their attacks only strengthened my resolve.

In November 2016, Larry Nassar, the doctor for Team USA Gymnastics, was arrested on federal charges of possessing child pornography. He was also charged with 22 counts of sexual conduct with a minor. These explosive charges revealed the toxic culture for all to see. After eight years of harassment, I was redeemed.

I was the Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) at Levi’s by this time. I was astonished that companies like AT&T and P&G were maintaining their support of USAG despite the arrest of Nassar and growing evidence that USAG had covered up Nassar’s sexual abuse of athletes for decades.

I wrote to marketing leaders at these companies to suggest that they apply pressure by ending their sponsorship of USAG. No word back.

Read the Whole Article

The post The Why Behind XX-XY Athletics appeared first on LewRockwell.

Just for funzies, what would be the legal ramifications if it was determined that Biden in fact did NOT validly win the 2020 election?   There is no precedent.  Would the entire 2020 elections be voided, including state, and local?  Would every Congressional member who was up for 2020 re-election be ejected?   Every law and EO rescinded.  Every Bill signed – automatically dead?  Every fine collected by the government returned?   Every lawsuit VOID.   Would federal salaries and pensions have to be returned?  Rewind everything?   What about the Stock Market?

How Can You Possibly Unravel 4 Years?

As more and more testimony reveals fraud was rampant – how do you recount when states tossed their ballots?  You can’t.   Therefore, it would mean that for the sake of legality – it would all be automatically repealed.   Everything.  A surreal outcome.   One that would put the US into chaos.

The Liberal left were quick to accuse Russia of election fraud after Putin’s recent win.   Yet will vehemently deny that election fraud can occur or ever has occurred in the US – because such people making these statements are delusional…  It is much easier to accept when the candidate of your choice is the elected winner.

When looking at newly elected leaders throughout the world, it is worthwhile to see which candidate the Corrupted US Establishment is rooting for.   That candidate would likely be the preferred coup given they have been bought, groomed and subjected to an Oprah makeover. The election will be a ‘landslide’!  The anointed politician will show up for all duties – but their voice will be a script, their pen devoid of ink, and their wage will be subject to a Rothschild tithe of 10%.   Control of their country will be handed to the Cartel.   The only means of getting it back?  A military uprising.   As we watch – Africa.

But in the US, the military has already been couped.   The vast majority are minions.   When a Tweeter declares their hatred of Trump because he didn’t serve – which President’s did serve?   The easier answer is – 14 did NOT serve including Clinton, Obama, Trump and Biden.  Between 1909 and 1945, all six Presidents did NOT serve in the military.  Most enlisted for their compulsory service 2-4 years in the Reserves.

The purpose of the Secretary of the Department of Defense, Lloyd Austin, is for him to act as the defacto military head and make the decisions before reporting and recommending those decisions to the President.   Wherein, The President has The Last Word.  When disgraceful Generals make  scandalous comments about Trump – they don’t disparage Trump – instead they reveal they are NOT Military at all – at least not the military of CODE – their eethics and values are twalette water.

In the business world, a leader surrounds himself with men who have unique perspectives to consider – to balance the scales.   A Leader’s downfall can typically be attributed to who surrounded him.   For Example:   Russia’s President Putin has Lavrov – someone he can trust and entrust with his very life and never doubt that loyalty.   That doesn’t mean they have the same opinions – it means they value and respect each other and draw from each other’s viewpoints.   Sounds simplistically easy…

But that’s not how it is working in DC.

Loyalty is bought.   Respect is cynically laughable.   Trust is a foreign entity living inside a Mars crater.   When Putin speaks – everyone listens.   When Congress/Biden speaks – everyone starts doing the merenque on the dance floor we call the Capitol Gay Bedroom.   And yet, despite this vast chasm of reality, the liberal half of the population thinks Congress are mini me gods.  And how dare anyone speak opinion.  Because opinion is now Hate Speech curable by re-education camps, a hefty fine and 8-10 years in jail.

The Masked Marauders.  Are – Unmasked and making perverse mistakes.

They surrounded themselves with fools and jesters.  Druggies and the dementia riddled.   The Marauders have alienated the thinkers and instead aligned themselves with plastic robots melting in the sun.  Their brains already pledged.   As such – one country, Russia, has been able to hold at bay and out maneuver;   Ukraine, America, Canada, Japan, Australia, and the entirety of Europe sans Belarus and Hungary.   Pitting the strategy and critical analysis of hundreds of Marauders & their drug induced minions against Two – Putin & Lavrov.   And they lost.   Behind closed doors, the ego fallout must be heady!

The $1.598 question isn’t how Putin will react to the terrorist attack, the question is ‘when’ will The Marauders pull the plug out of desperate self preservation… as losses mount and debt colludes.  Putin and Lavrov are guided and governed by logic.  The Marauders are male emotional hysterics.   Putin knows how to extract the impacted tooth while The Marauders only know how to infect ALL the teeth.

Bunkers:   Media News – Zuckerberg is building a bunker on Kauai.  REALITY:  Zuckerberg started the project a decade ago – and the bunker is likely already fully functionable.  It appeared Oprah was building a bunker inside a mountain on her Maui property.   BlackRock reportedly has upwards of eight bunkers located at crucial points across the US, although New Zealand and Australia are subject to multiple bunker rumors as well.

Banks:   Follow the CEO exodus.   JP Morgan ‘reshuffling’.   New York Community Banks shares fall 21% in one day.   Swiss Bank CEO resigns effective immediately.  Ally Financial CEO stepped down.  TD Group new CEO exits.   Morgan Stanley CEO stepping down. UK Bank CEO quits.  Discover CEO resigns abruptly.   1500 CEO’s quit last year.

Maersk Shipping said it will no longer lay waste to the Red Sea and is suspending that service in favor of the much more expensive longer route necessary to deliver commodities to EUROPE.   Shortages.   Pricing.

The BIG PICTURE:

China remains an anomaly even though America backstabbed them – there remains a psychological desire to be a part of the Football Clique.   They wanted to wear the Letter Jackets and have all the girls.   They wanted to be a super-power.   As such, the American apparatus destroyed their economy and reputation.  Still, that Letter Jacket looks awfully cool – even Putin wanted one.  Once upon a time.

BOEING:   And then there is Boeing.  Boeing is one of the world’s largest defense and space contractors.  For the military, Boeing provides:   missiles, fighters, bombers, transports, munition, spacecraft, etc…   Their planes are literally falling apart in the sky.   Their CEO resigned in humiliation.   How reliable are their jets?  Their missiles?   Are they having the same fallout?

November 2023, Boeing Osprey crashes in Japan Sea.

February 2024, two Boeing Apache helicopters crash

January 2024, Navy helicopter crashes in Coronado California

June 20222, and August 2023, Super Hornet made by Boeing crashed near Trona.

Short Answer:  YES.   The FBI is now warning that criminals are sabotaging passenger flights.  Presumably, employees of – Boeing.  Or maybe Boeing accidentally gave the vax to the wrong employees and have a severe shortage of mechanics and engineers?   Who the Fark knows in the Truth or Disinformation Pundit Board Game.

Will we overturn the 2020 Election.   Not likely.   Not because the proof isn’t available, but because our politicians take each step marked by fear, money, blackmail, and self preservation.  Trump can not “Save America” – however, no one could.   what he can do is slash and gash eliminations that become legally solidified prohibiting government expansion and ANY NGO infiltration financially, economically, politically or ethically.   READ THE BILLS MORONS!

– A Big Thank You To Sarah For Plugging Me on Substack!!! Appreciate it!

Reprinted with permission from Helena-The Nationalist Voice.

The post Voiding the 2020 Election – Russia, China, & Illusions appeared first on LewRockwell.

Back in 2015, the Guardian published a fascinating report titled Now the truth emerges: how the US fuelled the rise of Isis in Syria and Iraq, which detailed how U.S. and British intelligence were supporting Islamic jihadist rebel groups in Syria with the objective of overthrowing the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

The report included a link to a leaked 2012 Department of Defense document about U.S. support for these rebel groups in Syria, including ISIS. This report stuck with me, and I was a reminded of it a couple of years later when Assad was accused in April 2017 of using chemical weapons against Syrian civilians.

Notably, this chemical weapons attack just happened to occur the day after Secretary of State Rex Tillerson publicly announced that regime change in Syria was no longer official U.S. policy. In other words—we were told—the day after the U.S. announced it was getting off Assad’s case, he committed an atrocity (of zero military value) that would guarantee that the U.S. recommit itself to getting rid of him.

Though most of the legacy press endorsed the assertion that Assad’s forces were behind the attack, a few discerning reporters noted that it could have easily been carried about by one of the Islamic jihadist groups operating in the region to make the Trump administration rethink its abandonment of its regime change objective. Sure enough, a couple of days after the chemical attack, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson announced that he was reconsidering his announcement the week before.

Now comes the news of a major terrorist attack on the Crocus City Hall in Moscow that has left hundreds dead and injured. The U.S. government claims the attack was carried out by ISIS-K, which has reportedly taken responsibility for it. However, Kremlin officials have alleged that some of the gunmen were trying to escape into Ukraine, utilizing a ‘window’ of support from across the border.

The U.S. government just issued a statement condemning the terrorist attack in Moscow, but this reminds me of U.S. government doublespeak about ISIS back in the 2012-2017 period—that is, publicly condemning ISIS while secretly supporting it in Syria.

My concern now is that the attack on the Moscow theater was—like the Re’im music festival massacre in Israel last October—designed to provoke the absolute maximum violent response.

A hypothetical scenario is the CIA and DoD have continued to support ISIS and that the gunmen were indeed attempting to escape through Ukraine.

If this is indeed the case, it suggests that the gambit is for Russian intelligence to discover the plot and conduct a major reprisal in Ukraine. The Biden Administration will insist that the U.S. does NOT support ISIS, and that the Russian reprisal is further evidence that Putin is a maniac.

This originally appeared on Courageous Discourse.

The post U.S. History of Using ISIS appeared first on LewRockwell.