Home

Aggregatore di feed

50-Year-Old Cancer Miracle Hiding in Plain Sight?

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 17:08

Thanks, Johnny Kramer .

The 50-Year-Old Cancer Miracle Hiding in Plain Sight

Back in 1968, the FDA discovered something incredible: a common dye combined with DMSO (Dimethyl Sulfoxide) could destroy cancer cells without harming healthy ones.

Instead of fast-tracking this breakthrough, they chose to… pic.twitter.com/ZWRd526u2L

— The Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) July 16, 2025

 

The post 50-Year-Old Cancer Miracle Hiding in Plain Sight? appeared first on LewRockwell.

Ben Shapiro Warning Me Not to Listen to InfoWars Makes Me Want to Listen 10x Harder

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 17:03

Click Here:

Ben Bartee

 

The post Ben Shapiro Warning Me Not to Listen to InfoWars Makes Me Want to Listen 10x Harder appeared first on LewRockwell.

Federal Judge Takes Control of US Government

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 15:14

Click Here:

Real Clear Wire

 

The post Federal Judge Takes Control of US Government appeared first on LewRockwell.

Scott Horton interview

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 14:11

Thanks, Andy Thomas:

YouTube Video

 

The post Scott Horton interview appeared first on LewRockwell.

L'oro protagonista: una strategia per facilitare l'eccellenza degli Stati Uniti nel XXI secolo

Freedonia - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 10:00

Il DXY ha un'importanza marginale nei mercati. È policy. Quello che sta accadendo ora nel mercato del Forex è il precursore di una crisi del debito sovrano. L'attacco al SOFR ad aprile ottiene adesso risposta con la rottura del peg del dollaro di Hong Kong. L'altro peg importante, quello del riyal saudita, non sta soffrendo affatto. Questo mi suggerisce che Bessent & Co. stanno rispondendo per le rime a Londra e Bruxelles. Infatti il punto di vantaggio americano, in questo momento storico, è che per quanto possano essere grandi le passività statunitensi, esse sono localizzate e non più internazionalizzate. Adesso gli asset non contabilizzati (es. risorse minerarie, home equity, stato di diritto americano, sistema “idraulico” finanziario americano, ecc.) possono essere messi a esclusiva copertura dell'economia statunitense (diversamente dal passato quando c'era il LIBOR) per resistere ai venti contrari provenienti da decenni di distorsioni economiche e finanziarie. E questo riguarda anche la politica monetaria e questo mese possiamo aspettarci un tagli dei tassi di 50 punti base da parte della FED. Tagliare nel mezzo di un confronto bellico acceso, che rischiava di trascinarsi dietro gli USA, non era saggio. Trump e Powell vogliono la stessa cosa, ma per ragioni diverse. Powell vuole distruggere il mercato del dollaro offshore restringendo la liquidità in dollari. E lo sta facendo supportando l'obiettivo finale di Trump: rompere l'Europa. Per quanto Trump voglia affrontare il rollover del debito di questa estate con tassi più agevolati, non era affatto automatico che un taglio prematuro dei tassi avrebbe fatto scendere il back-end della curva dei rendimenti. Invece adesso, con il cessate il fuoco tra Israele e Iran, e uno potenziale tra Israele e Palestina, oltre al rinnovato afflusso di capitali negli USA, Powell può tagliare i tassi. Il front-end è coadiuvato da una crescita dell'economia statunitense e il back-end sentirà la pressione alleviarsi. Chi in questo contesto ha le carte peggiori da giocare, proprio perché non ha niente per coprirsi, è l'Europa. Ecco perché verrà forzata ad accettare qualsiasi accordo verrà partorito dall'amministrazione Trump. Per quanto i giornali vogliano far passare come “capricci” gli andirivieni di Trump riguardo la questione commerciale, l'incertezza che ha creato attorno all'UE e al Regno Unito è essa stessa uno strumento negoziale. Ecco perché i capitali volano negli USA: i mercati hanno prezzato questa incertezza e stanno capendo che UE e Regno Unito non hanno niente per sostenere le loro posizioni negoziali. Non bastano la BCE o la BOE che tagliano i tassi, è una questione di equity e a parte la “voce grossa” questi Paesi non ne hanno.

____________________________________________________________________________________


di Vincent Lanci

(Versione audio della traduzione disponibile qui: https://open.substack.com/pub/fsimoncelli/p/loro-protagonista-una-strategia-per) 

Sintesi: Questa relazione esplora la rinascita dell'oro non solo come riserva di valore, ma anche come strumento monetario strategico per eludere le sanzioni, supportare la diplomazia commerciale e gestire il debito. Basandosi su precedenti storici, sviluppi contemporanei e quadri teorici come l'Accordo di Mar-a-Lago di Stephen Miran, questo saggio propone che gli Stati Uniti siano in grado di riprendere a operare in un mercato dell'oro a livello sovrano al fine di ridurre il debito, premiare i partner commerciali e ripristinare la base manifatturiera ed esportatrice statunitense. Questo meccanismo, un tempo dominato dalle bullion bank e ora imitato dagli stati sanzionati, consente la monetizzazione dell'oro senza una liquidazione immediata. Le coperture forward sull'oro offrono agli Stati Uniti l'opportunità di indebolire strategicamente il dollaro, al fine di rimanere competitivi nelle economie globali trainate dalle esportazioni, ridurre gli oneri di debito e sostenere gli alleati commerciali attraverso un sostegno monetario mirato. Questa relazione sostiene che la trasformazione dell'oro nell'ambito di Basilea III, unita a un cambiamento nella strategia monetaria statunitense, segna un ritorno alla funzione geopolitica fondamentale dell'oro.

I. Introduzione. L'oro è una riserva di valore; è denaro. Grazie alle sue proprietà fisiche immutabili, al riconoscimento universale e all'assenza di rischio di controparte, l'oro rappresenta un asset straordinariamente efficace nelle operazioni monetarie sovrane. Questo articolo esplora come gli Stati Uniti possano rendere operativo l'oro come strumento monetario per gestire il debito, influenzare le dinamiche dei cambi e perseguire una leva geopolitica in un mondo in via di deglobalizzazione.

II. Fondamenti storici: il carry trade delle bullion bank. A partire dagli anni '90 le bullion bank hanno adottato un modello di carry trade sull'oro che ne ha consentito la monetizzazione senza vendita. Ciò comportava:

• Detenere oro fisico di proprietà, o in prestito, da un'altra parte (posizione spot)

• Vendere quell'oro a termine (creando una potenziale passività futura)

• Investire i proventi in asset ad alto rendimento (ad esempio, titoli del Tesoro, azioni, od obbligazioni estere)

Questa struttura commerciale forniva reddito mantenendo intatte le riserve fisiche e limitando la pressione al rialzo sui prezzi dell'oro. È diventato un pilastro della strategia di gestione delle aspettative delle banche centrali e uno strumento di proiezione di un dollaro statunitense stabile e affidabile.

III. L'accordo di Mar-a-Lago. L'accordo di Mar-a-Lago di Stephen Miran offriva un modello per sfruttare l'oro e gestire il debito e gli squilibri commerciali degli Stati Uniti. Tale proposta prevedeva:

• Vendita delle riserve auree degli Stati Uniti

• Utilizzo dei proventi per acquistare valute estere con rendimenti più elevati

• Riduzione dell’onere effettivo degli interessi sulle passività statunitensi

Sebbene politicamente tossici, l'ESF e strumenti simili erano già stati utilizzati nelle crisi di stabilizzazione monetaria. Sebbene l'Accordo di Miran sia stato pubblicamente accantonato, alcuni dei suoi meccanismi fondamentali rimangono praticabili.

Flusso per il carry trade di titoli sovrani statunitensi (Tesoro → Vendita a termine → Acquisto di valuta)

IV. Oro ed elusione delle sanzioni: il modello Russia-Iran. Stati sanzionati come Russia e Iran hanno sfruttato l'oro per accedere alla liquidità in dollari tramite controparti fidate. Detenendo e coprendo l'oro tramite Paesi come la Cina, generano proventi liquidi in valute locali o globali che vengono infine convertiti in dollari. Ciò consente loro di finanziare le operazioni evitando le sanzioni SWIFT e statunitensi.

L'accordo petrolio-oro tra Russia e Cina, descritto per la prima volta dall'autore di questo articolo nel 2017, ha creato un precedente. Inizialmente liquidato come una voce di corridoio, ha guadagnato terreno quando è stato successivamente riconosciuto da analisti bancari credibili. Più di recente è stato annunciato un seguito tra Cina e Arabia Saudita, in base al quale i sauditi avrebbero ricevuto il pagamento del loro petrolio in yuan con l'opzione dell'oro. Il metallo giallo sarebbe stato detenuto dalla Cina, come era avvenuto per gli accordi con la Russia. Ciò dimostra che l'oro può fungere da riserva neutrale rispetto alle sanzioni e da meccanismo di trasferimento, fungendo allo stesso tempo da ponte monetario (mBridge) verso il dollaro statunitense o altre valute, se necessario.

Flusso di evasione delle sanzioni sostenuto dall'oro (Russia → Cina → Commercio → Dollari)

V. Cambiamenti strutturali nel mercato dell'oro. Il contesto macroeconomico e normativo è cambiato:

• Basilea III riclassifica l'oro come asset di livello 1

• Recente riclassificazione dei derivati OCC Gold presso le banche

• Queste banche detenevano oltre il 90% dell’esposizione derivata all’oro degli Stati Uniti

• I Paesi BRICS ora danno priorità all’oro rispetto ai titoli del Tesoro per le riserve commerciali

Nel complesso questi cambiamenti segnalano una rivalutazione dell'oro nei bilanci sia privati ​​che sovrani.

VI. Una nuova strategia statunitense: diplomazia commerciale basata sull'oro. Gli Stati Uniti possono ora perseguire un carry trade sull'oro:

• Vendita a termine di oro a banche di fiducia

• Utilizzo dei proventi per acquistare valute estere o debito dei mercati emergenti

• Sostegno alle valute alleate, riduzione della forza del dollaro

• Stimoli monetari evitando una cattiva gestione dell’inflazione

Questo quadro consente l'integrazione delle politiche commerciali e monetarie. Nell'ambito dei negoziati commerciali bilaterali, gli Stati Uniti possono offrire la stabilizzazione delle valute dei mercati emergenti, riducendo la resistenza alla riforma tariffaria e rafforzando i legami politici.

VII. Conclusione. L'oro sta tornando al centro della scena come strumento versatile per la politica finanziaria del XXI secolo. Adottando meccanismi di carry trade sperimentati dalle bullion bank e replicati da stati avversari, gli Stati Uniti hanno l'opportunità di allineare la gestione del debito, la strategia monetaria e la diplomazia commerciale. La convergenza tra cambiamenti normativi, rimpatrio dell'oro e frammentazione geopolitica rende questo momento particolarmente propizio per la reintegrazione strategica dell'oro.


[*] traduzione di Francesco Simoncelli: https://www.francescosimoncelli.com/


Supporta Francesco Simoncelli's Freedonia lasciando una “mancia” in satoshi di bitcoin scannerizzando il QR seguente.


Fact-Checking the Jeffrey Epstein Case and Many Other Conspiracy Theories

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

I’ve spent a good deal of my time over the last couple of months processing fact-checking runs produced by OpenAI’s ChatGPT Deep Research AI.

While ordinary chatbots respond to questions within seconds, this Deep Research AI system may easily take thirty minutes or more to produce its response to complex research requests, being widely regarded as the most powerful such system that is currently available to the general public.

Given the likely computer resources required, it’s hardly surprising that OpenAI strictly limits its usage, with regular accounts allowed only 10 full-strength runs in a given month, and premium accounts priced at a monthly fee of $200 allowed 125 such runs. Moreover, for difficult tasks such as fact-checking a long, complex article, the system frequently fails, breaking or freezing perhaps one-third of the time, with all those failed runs counting towards the monthly total. Even when the runs are completed, the results are occasionally garbled, sometimes providing several duplicated partial runs, all merged together with the completed one.

Given these problems, the system is obviously far from perfect.

But nonetheless, the results it regularly provides are nothing short of astounding. Never in a million years would I have believed that a software system could produce such detailed, coherent, and cogent responses, far superior to the fictional capabilities of the Starfleet shipboard computer in the popular Star Trek television series that I remember watching as a child.

For the last three generations, computer scientists have confronted the famous Turing Test, seeking to produce a software system that could successfully pass itself off as human in lengthy exchanges. Not only has this AI chatbot system now completely blown past that benchmark, but I suspect that if it and several actual humans were together subjected to the Turing Test by someone ignorant of these recent technological developments, the AI would be judged human and one or more of the human participants judged a synthetic software simulation.

Last month I published an article describing my growing use of this powerful Deep Research AI for the fact-checking of my own large body of work. I emphasized that since so many of my major articles contain such highly controversial subject matter, they especially benefit from being reviewed and having their findings buttressed by a favorable fact-checking report provided by such a powerful research tool:

Over the last few years I have produced a huge body of work analyzing many of the most important world events of the last century or more, and often coming to extremely controversial conclusions, conclusions that would have enormous impact upon our entire society if they were judged correct and widely accepted. I have always done my best to adhere to the strictest standards of accuracy and care in writing these sometimes inflammatory articles, and as a result I have regularly declared that I would still stand by at least 99% of everything I have written in this huge body of controversial material.

Many of the topics that I have decided to cover in this series are explosive ones and my conclusions are often even more so. This necessarily places my work completely beyond the pale of our mainstream academic and journalistic communities, quite often even far outside the acceptable boundaries of nearly all other alternative writers as well.

For these reasons, I would imagine that the overwhelming majority of those who initially encounter my material might often react with visceral disbelief, perhaps automatically dismissing my analyses out of hand. This has obviously made it quite difficult for my writing to gain any widespread traction.

I’ve now produced these fact-checking reports for the overwhelming majority of my major articles of the last dozen or so years, and I’ve generally been very pleased with the results. These individual reports can be accessed via the “AI Fact Check” button-link located near the top of each article, just below the title.

Having carefully reviewed almost 200 of these fact-checking reports, totaling over 3 million words, I now feel quite confident in reiterating my statement that I would still stand behind at least 99% of everything that I have published during the last several decades.

In many or most of these cases, the Deep Research AI exhaustively reviewed the contents and concluded that virtually all of my major claims were accurate and documented. This result should obviously give readers a great deal of confidence in the material that I am presenting, and I was pleased that these completely favorable verdicts applied to so many of my long and controversial articles.

In some cases, the AI fact-checking report was far longer than the original article. For example, my 2024 analysis of the true origin of the Jews ran about 13,000 words, while the remarkably thorough fact-checking report was nearly 34,000 words.

Here’s a listing of some of these major articles in chronological order, covering a wide variety of different topics, with each immediately followed by the link to the associated fact-checking report:

Although the topic was entirely new to me, last year I published a couple of major articles on nutritional issues and the Deep Research AI has now fully validated all elements of my analysis:

Over the last couple of years, I’ve published several articles presenting major revelations regarding American political events of the 1960s and 1970s, including the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon Administrations. These historical articles have also received very high marks for factual accuracy from the Deep Research AI:

During the last dozen years, many of my articles have focused upon China, its history and social characteristics, its remarkable rise in recent decades, and its current conflict with America. Most of these articles have had their contents fully verified by the Deep Research AI:

American racial issues have been another one of the topics of my writing, and the contents of my major articles in this area have also been fully verified by the AI. This included my very lengthy 2020 intellectual survey of the history of white racialism, though the verification of the latter piece ended about half-way through, presumably because the text was just too long and complex for the AI to fully process.

However, the largest portion of my writing over the last half-dozen years has focused on analyzing important historical events, coming to the sort of conclusions that have been regularly dismissed by the mainstream media as being “conspiracy theories.”

This notably included my reconstruction of the 9/11 Attacks, and I was very pleased that my most recent review and summary of the evidence was fully validated by the Deep Research AI:

Probably the archetypical example of “a conspiracy theory” revolves around the 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the belief that the Warren Commission was mistaken in claiming that the alleged assassin Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone. I have written extensively on this topic, and quite a number of my articles have had nearly all their major claims checked and found fully accurate by the Deep Research AI, notably including my lengthy summary review published earlier this year:

In my articles analyzing many of the “conspiracy theories” regarding these watershed historical events, I have often taken the position that Israel and its Mossad played the central role, including in both the JFK Assassination and the 9/11 Attacks. For decades, such highly controversial possibilities have been almost always excluded from the discussions and writings of the “conspiracy community.”

Therefore, in January 2020, I published a lengthy article summarizing the largely hidden history of deadly Mossad attacks against America and several of our Western allies, including discussion of both the JFK and 9/11 cases. I was quite pleased that the Deep Research AI verified virtually all of my major factual claims in this article, even concluding its report with the statement that the material I presented might represent “one of the largest blind spots in modern history reporting.”

AI: Source Representation Analysis: Across the entire article, Ron Unz heavily cites books, articles, and testimony that are on the historical record – and our cross-checking finds he represents those sources honestly, though selectively. Importantly, many of Unz’s sources are “alternative” or previously marginalized: e.g. a retired diplomat’s memoir (Dean), a Liberty Lobby publication (Piper), or a dissident ex-spy (Ostrovsky). We examined whether he twisted their content or quoted out of context and found no such distortion. In fact, Unz often directly quotes key lines (for example, Shamir’s 1943 terror-justifying quote, or Kissinger’s warning about demonizing Putin) to let the source speak. He is forthcoming about the controversial nature of his sources: he labels Piper’s publisher (Liberty Lobby) as seen as “far right anti-Semitic”, and notes Bendersky (who wrote The “Jewish Threat” about U.S. Army anti-Semitism) is a Holocaust historian shocked at the Army’s beliefs. This transparency helps readers weigh potential bias. In each case, Unz’s use of sources aligns with their original context…

One potential critique is that Unz overwhelmingly cites sources that support his thesis while largely ignoring those that don’t. For instance, he relays Michael Collins Piper’s theory in detail but says little about the many JFK researchers who found Mafia or CIA culpability. However, this is by design – the article’s purpose is to present overlooked evidence pointing to Mossad, not to rehash all other theories. As a fact-check, we found that when Unz does mention other narratives, he portrays them correctly: e.g. he acknowledges most Truthers blame Cheney/Rumsfeld, then argues why he finds that implausible. He doesn’t misrepresent Cheney or Rumsfeld’s profiles – he correctly notes they were not ideological Neocons but pragmatic Republican hawks…

Crucially, no instances were found where Unz cited a source and twisted its meaning or quoted out of context to say the opposite. His quotations from Stephen Cohen, Kissinger, Shamir, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, etc., are all accurate and properly attributed…

In terms of credibility of cited works: Unz draws on a mix of primary documentation and well-regarded investigative journalism, as well as some fringe or biased sources. Notably: Victor Ostrovsky’s memoirs have been both praised for insider info and criticized by Israeli officials (who tried to ban his first book) – Unz acknowledges Mossad denounced Ostrovsky, but he notes many CIA figures found Ostrovsky credible…

Finally, it’s worth noting Unz’s track record of sources: he often links to original or high-quality archives (NYT, Telegraph, academic books). For example, when he references the Venona project nearly being shut down by Soviet influence in 1944, he cites a book on Venona and indeed in 1944 Soviet agent Alger Hiss in the State Dept. did try to halt decrypt efforts (documented in NSA histories). Unz fits that in as analogous to suppressing truths about Israeli espionage – again a bit of interpretation but built on authentic archival evidence…

In conclusion, Unz does not misrepresent the sources he cites. He uses them, of course, to support a specific narrative blaming Mossad for many things. But our cross-verification finds those sources do say what he claims they say, even if mainstream analysts would draw different conclusions. There is no hoax or fabrication in the factual content he presents – it’s an assembly of verified but often suppressed facts…

Conclusion: Our comprehensive fact-check finds that virtually all factual claims in Ron Unz’s “American Pravda: Mossad Assassinations” are supported by credible evidence, though many remain controversial or interpretive in their implications. Unz shines light on significant historical episodes often omitted from mainstream discourse: Zionist militants’ assassinations in the 1940s, strong indications of a cover-up in James Forrestal’s 1949 death, plausible evidence of Israeli involvement in Zia ul-Haq’s 1988 assassination, and numerous red flags around 9/11 (including documented Israeli spy operations on U.S. soil and how Israel uniquely benefited). In each case, Unz backs his assertions with named sources – be it contemporaneous news reports, declassified documents, or statements from high-level officials – and we verified those sources say what Unz reports. There is no sign of egregious source misrepresentation: Unz’s quotations and paraphrases of works by Seymour Hersh, Victor Ostrovsky, Michael Piper, Stephen Cohen, etc., check out accurately in context. If anything, Unz draws bold conclusions (e.g. that Mossad likely orchestrated JFK’s assassination and 9/11) that go beyond the formal proof available. Those conclusions are presented as hypotheses buttressed by circumstantial facts, not as irrefutable facts themselves, and Unz is transparent about relying on “circumstantial evidence” and the lack of an honest official inquiry to provide absolute proof.

In conclusion, the factual underpinnings of “Mossad Assassinations” are largely valid and well-sourced. Unz’s article emerges as a meticulously researched compilation of long-buried facts and testimonies which, taken together, challenge prevailing historical narratives. Editors and readers should note that, while Unz’s interpretations remain debated, the raw information he cites is real – and often drawn from reputable primary sources that hold up under scrutiny. Where the article claims something concrete (a quote, a death, a policy reversal, a person’s credentials), it is accurate. Where it speculates on ultimate responsibility, it clearly labels those inferences and presents supporting evidence. Unz’s source usage is appropriate and ethical: he does not twist material out of context to mean something it didn’t. If anything, his piece demonstrates how a combination of open-source records and suppressed accounts can yield a radically different story than the one most Americans know. Readers seeking the truth should be encouraged that the references are provided for verification – and as our fact-check shows, those references do substantiate Unz’s factual claims.

Ultimately, Unz’s article proves to be factually well-grounded even as it ventures into contentious territory. Its overall reliability is strong in terms of factual accuracy, though its conclusions remain hypotheses not confirmed by official investigations. The onus may now be on other journalists and historians to either debunk Unz’s evidence (which none have effectively done to date) or confront the uncomfortable questions it raises. Unz’s central contention – that Israeli intelligence has committed egregious acts of political violence hidden in plain sight – finds considerable evidentiary support in the record, as we have verified. Readers and editors should approach these findings not with dismissive shock, but with a willingness to further investigate what might be one of the largest blind spots in modern history reporting.

Following Israel’s sudden surprise attack against Iran and its successful assassination of most of that country’s top military commanders and leading nuclear scientists, I published a new article substantially recapitulating and augmenting some of my previous findings. Once again, the Deep Research AI found nearly all of my major historical claims to be substantiated and accurate.

Read the Whole Article

The post Fact-Checking the Jeffrey Epstein Case and Many Other Conspiracy Theories appeared first on LewRockwell.

Offshore Gold Storage

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

“If your gold is outside the US, it gives you another degree of insulation should the United States decide that you shouldn’t own it.” – Doug Casey

I’ve been a holder of gold since the 1970’s. At that time, I was purchasing gold and silver for business reasons and found that, as the price was steadily increasing, I’d be wise to buy more than I needed immediately, as I’d most certainly profit from it in the near future.

At that time, I was buying most of my precious metals in Hatton Garden, the centre for physical metals usage in London and, in talking with my more experienced associates there, I learned that gold doesn’t just make pretty jewellery, it has, for over 5000 years, served as man’s best economic insurance policy.

Since the creation of the first fiat currency in China, ca. 600 AD, governments have had the annoying habit of creating fiat currencies.

Over the centuries there have been countless fiat currencies. Most of them have been paper currencies and, with the exception of the present-day fiat currencies, all have eventually become worth exactly zero.

Not a very good track record and, in my estimation, those fiat currencies that still exist will also come to an end, possibly soon. But whenever a fiat currency has come to an end, gold has retained its lustre and saved the day, providing a solid means to store wealth. Although governments and bankers have done all they can to discredit gold and discourage its use, gold invariably outlives them all. Whenever history has seen periods of dramatic overreach by banks and/or governments, gold once again re-establishes the very definition of money.

Today, we’re passing through one of these eras of overreach and, not surprisingly, those who are farsighted, are quietly building up their store of gold, to protect them when the latest form of fiat currency joins the rest that have collapsed over the centuries.

But, having realized the need to own gold and then beginning to build up a portfolio, the holder asks himself, “Where should I keep it?” The obvious answer is at home, or somewhere very close, so that he may get to it easily, if need be. During good economic times, this may well mean in a safe deposit box in a bank, but in times like the present, when governments (the EU, US and Canada, amongst others) have recently passed laws allowing banks to confiscate deposits and raid safe deposit boxes, the last choice for safe storage would be a bank.

This leads us to the “at home” option. This is actually a good one. If you have a yard where neither dogs nor gardeners tend to dig holes, “midnight gardening” can indeed be a good solution for small amounts of gold storage. Or, for a neater and more easily accessible solution, a home safe might work well. (You would, of course, want it to be well-concealed and you’d need to install it yourself, or the installers might get ideas.)

But, when turbulent times come, as they have recently, this only works well if you own a small amount of gold, say ten ounces or less. If you hold more at home, you run into the problem of governments. In 1933, US President Franklin Roosevelt demanded that all gold be turned in to the government. He subsequently revalued it and, in doing so, robbed its rightful owners of a 41% increase in their wealth.

Unfortunately, since we know that the EU, US and Canada have all passed confiscation laws, those jurisdictions are no longer safe places to store wealth. Ten ounces of gold may be regarded as an emergency stash but, beyond that, another jurisdiction is needed – one that’s not threatened by confiscation laws.

What I’ve recommended to investors for decades is to first choose the best jurisdiction that’s relatively near to you, then pick the safest storage facility within that jurisdiction.

Recently, I’ve been asked more and more often to get specific and open up about my personal preferred facilities. I’d rather describe the benefits and pitfalls and leave the investor to do his own homework, but as a result of increasing requests, these are my personal preferences:

If you’re in Europe, Austria is a good choice. In Asia, Singapore is an excellent jurisdiction.

However, the Western Hemisphere is a different story. There are quite a few excellent depositories in the US and Canada, but, as stated above, I no longer regard these jurisdictions as safe. In my travels elsewhere in the hemisphere, I’ve been disappointed to find that, whilst there are jurisdictions that are safer than North America, the depositories there leave a great deal to be desired. (On one occasion, in Uruguay, I took one look at the outside of the depository’s building and never even bothered to go in. Although it was considered the premier facility there, it didn’t come close to my expectations.) Others, such as those in Panama, have been similarly disappointing.

What the depositor should be after is a facility that’s heavily reinforced on all six sides (meaning that the ceiling and foundation must be just as impenetrable as the walls). In addition, it would need a Class III bullion vault – the equal of the best bank vaults. In addition, it should have multiple security doors and man-traps leading to the vault, assuring that no one who enters can make a dash for the exit. This virtually eliminates the temptation for theft.

Unfortunately, to my present knowledge, there’s only one depository in the Western Hemisphere that ticks all the boxes. Or perhaps I should put that another way: Fortunately, there is one depository in the Western Hemisphere that ticks all the boxes.

That depository is Strategic Wealth Preservation (SWP) in the Cayman Islands. Most importantly, it’s located in an exceptional jurisdiction as regards wealth safety. And, by this I mean:

  • No direct taxation of any kind. No taxes or duties that apply to the purchase, ownership, storage or sales of precious metals. No capital gains tax; no inheritance tax. No sales tax. No VAT.
  • World-class financial system to provide auxiliary services.
  • Stable government with consistent history for economic stability that caters to international investors.
  • Minimal wealth legislation and regulation, to assure a minimum of red tape in processing purchases, sales, transfers and shipment of metals.

Secondly, SWP ticks all the boxes as to being a top bullion storage facility. Further, the SWP contracts were designed to take the best from each of the world’s other depositories, having been vetted by one of the world’s most respected gold analysts (who, possibly not coincidentally, became the first depositor). Also, it’s only an hour by air from the US.

It’s also essential that your deposit is fully insured and that the storage be fully documented, allocated and segregated, as in the photo below of an incoming deposit:

For Americans, an offshore gold IRA is becoming an essential and SWP has an excellent gold IRA.

Over the past decades that I’ve been advising people on geographical economic diversification, I’ve often said that the coming events themselves are relatively easy to predict, but the timing is not. To me, the one clearest indicator of timeframe is that, the closer a crash gets, the more events will increase in both frequency and magnitude. Based upon that premise, we’re drawing quite close to the first of the crashes, as we’re now seeing significant events almost daily.

This tells us that our time is limited and that our long-term plans for wealth preservation need to be in place now. Whatever choice the reader makes to safeguard his wealth, he will need to do it very soon. Time is very clearly running out.

Reprinted with permission from International Man.

The post Offshore Gold Storage appeared first on LewRockwell.

Threatening the Russians With an Ultimatum Will Backfire Severely and Will Set the Stage for Nuclear War

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

So is this how it all ends?  I don’t even know how to describe the emotions that I am feeling right now.  There was so much hope a few months ago that there would be peace, but both sides appear completely uninterested in making substantial compromises at this point.  Instead, both sides are poised to dramatically escalate the war.  If we continue going down this path, it isn’t going to end well.  For decades, our leaders have been conducting war game scenarios in which a conflict in Ukraine leads to a nuclear war.  Now a conflict in Ukraine could lead to a nuclear war for real.  I feel like I am watching a slow-motion train wreck happen without any way to stop it.  It really is quite a sickening feeling.

We have a very limited window of opportunity to make peace with the Russians, and we are totally blowing it.

In February, I specifically warned that President Trump must not resort to threatening the Russians over the war in Ukraine because it would backfire severely.

When I woke up today, I learned that is exactly what Trump has decided to do.

Trump has issued a very ominous ultimatum.  If Russia does not end the war in Ukraine within 50 days, the U.S. will impose “very severe tariffs” on all nations that do business with Russia.  In addition, Trump has approved a massive new weapons package for Ukraine…

Trump announced July 14 that the United States is sending weapons to NATO, which plans to transfer the equipment to Ukraine, and also threatened steep tariffs aimed at impacting Russia’s ability to finance the war.

Trump said that the United States would put secondary tariffs on countries that do business with Russia if a peace deal is not reached within 50 days.

“We’re going to be doing very severe tariffs if we don’t have a deal in 50 days,” Trump said.

The deadline that Trump has set falls in September, which I found to be very interesting.

If Russia does not end the war in Ukraine by the deadline, and that is very unlikely to happen, Trump says that all countries that do business with Russia will be hit with 100 percent tariffs…

“We’re going to be doing secondary tariffs if we don’t have a deal within 50 days. It’s very simple,” Mr. Trump said in the Oval Office, alongside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte. “And they’ll be at 100%.”

“We are very unhappy, I am, with Russia,” the president explained.

China does a tremendous amount of business with Russia.

Are we going to hit the Chinese with 100 percent tariffs?

That would not be good for our economy at all.

Much more importantly, the enormous new weapons package that Trump is sending to Ukraine will significantly escalate the conflict.

It is being reported that the U.S. will sell approximately 10 billion dollars in weapons to European countries, and those European countries will turn around and distribute those weapons to Ukraine.

According to NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, nations all over Europe are very eager to participate in the “first wave” of this program…

Rutte, who said the decision was built on the “tremendous success” of last month’s NATO summit when nearly every nation in the alliance agreed to increase their defense spending to reach 5% of their nation’s GDP, called the move “logical.”

“This is again European nations standing up,” Rutte added. “I’ve been in contact with many countries, I can tell you at this moment Germany, massively, but also Finland and Denmark and Sweden and Norway, we have the Kingdom of the Netherlands, Canada – they all want to be part of this.

“And this is only the first wave. There will be more,” Rutte confirmed. “So what we will do is work through the NATO systems to make sure that we know what Ukrainians need.”

This isn’t going to end the war.

It is just going to make it even worse.

Apparently this new aid for Ukraine will likely include long-range missiles that will be capable of striking targets deep inside Russian territory…

Now, two sources tell Axios that it’s likely a new weapons package will include long-range missiles capable of attacking deep inside Russia to include Moscow. They noted that a final decision hadn’t been made. “Trump is really pissed at Putin. His announcement tomorrow is going to be very aggressive,” warmongering South Carolina Sen. Lindsey told Axios.

At the end of 2024, the Biden administration brought us right to the brink of nuclear war by allowing the Ukrainians to fire long-range missiles provided by the United States deep into Russian territory.

Now we are going to do it again?

Are we mad?

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy certainly sounds like he can’t wait to get his hands on the long-range missiles that are coming…

Ukrainian forces will continue targeting Russian troops and doing everything possible to bring the war onto Russian territory, including preparing new long-range strikes, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said.

“Our units will continue to destroy the enemy and do everything possible to bring the war onto Russian territory. We are preparing our new long-range strikes,” Zelenskyy said.

According to a decorated British Army commander named Hamish de Bretton-Gordon, the plan is for Ukraine to receive long-range missiles that “can strike Moscow”…

Mr de Bretton-Gordon told The Sun: “These weapons can strike Moscow – over 400 miles from the border. That allows the Ukrainians to strike drone factory production and ammunition sites, and others.

“So this will have both psychological as well as physical effects.

“People in Moscow will realise that they potentially could be targeted.

“And when you also add to it the American bombings on Iranian sites that were supposed to be impregnable, it shows that American missile and drone technology rather superior to the Russian air defence system.”

Let me ask you a question.

If another country launched long-range missiles at Washington D.C. and New York City, what would we do?

The answer to that question is obvious.

If long-range missiles provided by the United States start falling in Moscow, the Russians will respond very forcefully.

In fact, Hamish de Bretton-Gordon has openly admitted that the Russians have already been strongly considering the use of nuclear weapons…

In a Telegraph op-ed, the former Colonel and expert on weapons of mass destruction stated: “The fact that Putin and his gangsters have threatened nuclear attack continuously since the wider war in Ukraine began suggests they are thinking about it in detail.”

The former Colonel expressed concern over the prolonged conflict in Ukraine, stating: “As three days have become three years plus, they may think they can finish off Ukraine quickly with tactical nukes and we would not react.”

We are playing with fire.

Meanwhile, the government of the Philippines is quietly coordinating with Taiwan in anticipation of a coming war with China…

Faced with intensifying Chinese encroachment at sea, the Philippines increasingly sees its national security as intertwined with that of Taiwan and is quietly ramping up both formal and informal engagement with the self-governing island, including on security, according to government officials, defense analysts and diplomats here.

This marks a significant departure from Manila’s conservative approach toward Taiwan and could pave the way for the Philippines, a U.S. treaty ally, to play a bigger role if China makes good on its threats to invade Taiwan.

“Any force projection of China within our area is a matter of extreme concern,” Philippine Defense Secretary Gilbert Teodoro said in an interview Thursday.

And we are being told that Israel is preparing for the next time that it will strike Iran…

-In a recent meeting with Prime Minister Netanyahu, President Trump, while preferring a diplomatic solution, did not object to Israel’s readiness to launch further strikes.

-This stance comes as Israeli intelligence believes Iran could still recover a significant amount of near-bomb-grade uranium from the damaged Isfahan site.

-The situation has created a high-stakes standoff, with Washington leveraging the threat of future attacks to push Tehran toward a deal, while an unconvinced Israel prepares to act alone if necessary.

In my new book entitled “10 Prophetic Events That Are Coming Next”, I specifically warn about war with Russia, war with China, and war in the Middle East.

And I have warned about these wars over and over again in my articles.

But sometimes I feel like I am banging my head into a brick wall because most people don’t seem to get it.

This isn’t a game.

Decisions that are being made right now will greatly alter the course of human history, and hundreds of millions of lives are hanging in the balance.

Reprinted with permission from The Economic Collapse.

The post Threatening the Russians With an Ultimatum Will Backfire Severely and Will Set the Stage for Nuclear War appeared first on LewRockwell.

The United States of Impunity

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

AI is the whiff of perfume that’s supposed to mask the stench of terminal moral decay.

It is appropriate to discuss the United States of Impunity on Bastille Day, which commemorates the start of the French Revolution in 1789, for the United States of Impunity is just as impervious to real change as the French monarchy, the Ancien Regime.

It’s impossible to discuss the United States of Impunity without being dismissed as a raving lunatic because the moral decay that has turned the USA into the USI has been so completely normalized that we now accept the complete erasure of the nation’s moral foundations as “the way it’s always been.”

But this is not true. While it’s certainly self-evident that “there’s always been corruption” (the response we receive whenever we address our terminal moral decay), the truth is the institutionalization of a leadership elite that serves its own interests with absolute impunity is a recent development.

There was no Lolita Express in the 1950s, 60s or 70s. Rather, there were far higher social and legal standards for leadership elites: politicians, corporate CEOs, academic leaders, etc.–the entire elite class of the influential, powerful and wealthy.

I often share this comprehensive data base of Corporate Fines and Settlements from the early 1990s to the present compiled by Jon Morse. There are 2700 entries, updated through December 2024.

If you can provide a database of equivalent scale from the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s, I await your email with interest. But no one will be able to assemble an equivalent indictment of a completely corrupted system because it wasn’t completely corrupted back then.

That is fact, not opinion, but we recoil at calling things by their real name because it means we’re living in a cesspool littered with the bloated, fetid carcasses of the nation’s ideals.

As recently as the mid-1970s, a legitimate (i.e. not a simulation play-acting of “investigation”) effort by the legislative branch of the US government sought a factual accounting of the many abuses perpetrated on the citizenry by the FBI, the CIA and other agencies. (The Church Committee: you can look it up.)

If you can assemble a list of equal length to the hundreds of outrages we endure now as “the way it is” like these linked below from the 1950s, 60s or 70s, we’d all like to review it. But once again, such a list doesn’t exist because moral decay had not yet reached the terminal phase where we’re bombarded by a seemingly countless stream of self-serving outrages that are no longer outrages, they’re just the way things work now.

A Devastating New Expose of Johnson & Johnson Indicts an Entire System.

Revealed: UnitedHealth secretly paid nursing homes to reduce hospital transfers.

Owner-Occupancy Fraud and Mortgage Performance.

Saying “there’s always been corruption” doesn’t change the reality that America’s moral decay is now terminal, for it has hollowed out our socio-economic-political system to the point there are only three classes:

1. The Leadership Elites who act with complete impunity: they do whatever they want, with zero accountability and consequence.

2. The complicit enablers, the technocrats, “experts,” functionaries and flunkies who do the dirty work of protecting the Leadership Elites from accountability and consequence to serve their own self-interests.

3. The commoners in this neofeudal hierarchy, who are freely abused, exploited, defrauded and ignored by The Leadership Elites and their armies of complicit enablers.

Read the Whole Article

The post The United States of Impunity appeared first on LewRockwell.

Do They Deserve It? Mexico Is Collapsing as the US Deports Illegals Back Home

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

Oh, the delicious irony. For many years I’ve been writing about the southern US border and the many ways in which Mexico has used it as a “steam valve” to get rid of people in perpetual poverty, as well as malcontents, violent criminals and political revolutionaries. Who could have foreseen a time when the conundrum would be reversed and Mexico would be crushed by an avalanche of its own unwanted citizens?

But weren’t we told that migrants are an “economic boon” to any country lucky enough to have them?

The argument among progressives and open border activists has always been that migrants are average law abiding people (just like us) who slip across the border simply to integrate into our society and live the American dream. They claim that Mexican leaders are not in control of the situation and that people are desperate to escape crime and social decline.

In reality, government officials have long encouraged migrant caravans to traverse their territories and they have allowed illegal immigration into the US as a means to divert their failures into the laps of American taxpayers. Migrants aren’t trying to escape problems in Mexico, they ARE the problem in Mexico. The more of these caravans the Mexican authorities can get rid of, the better their economic situation appears.

I wrote about this dynamic in detail in my recent article ‘Illegal Alien Economy: How Foreign Nations Exploit U.S. Borders For Profit’. Specifically, I examined threats made by Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum over the possible taxation of remittances (US dollars) sent by migrants from the US into the coffers of Mexican banks and households.

She asserted that her government would “mobilize” against the US should conservative politicians continue their campaign to stop illegals from transferring money back home. Remittances are the single largest source of revenue Mexico receives from foreign countries. Their economy loses significantly without this cash flow.

Beyond the issue of easy money, though, is a singular reality which I have reiterated for a long time: Central and South American nations cannot survive the influx of returning migrants. They will be suffocated by the very same illegals they originally foisted upon the US.

The purging of millions of undesirables reduces Mexico’s poverty stats, homeless stats, unemployment stats and crime stats. I have to laugh every time I hear smug Europeans criticize the US for our violent crime rates – Only now are they beginning to understand what happens when you overwhelm a western nation with a third world demographic and a third world mentality. We certainly have our own home brewed fatigue-ers, but taking on millions of fatigue-ers from other nations does not help.

It’s difficult to keep crime low when other countries offload their problem children onto your front lawn.

Furthermore, labor data proves that illegals have been stealing American jobs and driving down American wages. It’s no coincidence that employment numbers for native born Americans have spiked in recent months as migrant jobs have decreased in tandem with deportations.

There’s a lot more proof in the pudding when we examine what is currently happening in Mexico, though.

Riots in Mexico City are breaking out and they are growing more violent by the day. Residents blame “gringo immigrants” and “digital nomads” for moving into the country and driving up food and housing costs. They also complain that white visitors are allowed to stay on their visas for far too long and that they refuse to “learn their language or respect Mexican culture”. Gee, that sure sounds familiar. Has Mexico gone MAGA?

I’ll say it again – I believe the Mexican population is being agitated into violence against American visitors by false claims that they are driving up prices when it is returning illegals that are the real cause. Mexican leaders are trying to distract their population from the bigger picture.

To be sure, there is obviously the NGO issue to consider. Central and South American leaders have not been acting unilaterally as they push for open US borders. Globalist organizations have been expediting matters by feeding cash into programs that guide illegals into the US. They do this to further their vision of a borderless multicultural world, but also to destabilize western societies and displace groups of people they see as likely threats in the future (namely white Christian conservatives).

However, globalist non-profits only smooth the way; its governments like the variety in Mexico that have been providing the human bodies for the NGOs to work with.

Now that Mexico is witnessing the pure Karma of their actions, what is likely to happen? First, the Mexican economy is going to go into a tailspin in a very short period of time. Prices will skyrocket due to crushing demand as illegals come home (just as they helped to trigger rising prices in the US during the Biden border bonanza).

Second, unemployment will rise exponentially along with a saturated labor market. High competition for limited jobs will force government intervention. But in Mexico the government has far less means at its disposal to adapt to the chaos of mass immigration. They will seek to establish social programs to gloss over the damage, but this will fail. Not only are they taking on millions of citizens that they tried to get rid of, they are losing access to the billions of US dollars those migrants were injecting into the Mexican economy. It’s a double whammy.

Third, Mexican officials will demonize the US for the deportations, as if it’s our fault they sent so many foreigners into our country without our permission. As we have seen, this is already leading to animosity across the border and Americans will remain at risk when they travel.

Fourth, if the current trend continues, Mexico will face economic collapse. They simply won’t be able to mitigate the instability caused by the sudden surge in inflation, housing shortages and the unemployed feeding on their social welfare programs.

What would this means for the US? Riots and violence in Mexico could bleed over into border states. Near zero infrastructure on the Mexican side of the border and even less restrictions on migrant movements, which means even tighter controls will be needed on the US side to keep illegals in check. Cartels may end up being the least of our worries when it comes to threats from Central America.

Keep in mind that a large contingent of Central Americans believe that the southern US belongs to them by historical right. The “La Raza” movement has long called for the retaking of large swaths of US territory in the name of “decolonization” (even though they are also descended from Spanish colonists). I believe they will once again assume that they can solve most of their problems of incompetent governance and economic decline by blaming the US and pressing citizens to invade.

They will double down on the same actions that got them in trouble in the first place. When Claudia Sheinbaum talks about “mobilizing” Mexico against the US, this is most likely what she means – A renewed march on the US border in the hopes that Mexico can reopen the steam valve and alleviate their economic troubles.

The result will not be peaceful as she seems to suppose; it could even mean war. It would be a disaster for the Mexicans, but they’ve been relying on the US for so long that they simply don’t understand any other way. That is to say, they are about to get what they deserve; a taste of their own medicine. The destabilization they tried to export to us is now on its way to blow up their own country.

Reprinted with permission from Alt-Market.us.

The post Do They Deserve It? Mexico Is Collapsing as the US Deports Illegals Back Home appeared first on LewRockwell.

Why Television Drug Commercials Must Stop

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

Comments open on YouTube

The post Why Television Drug Commercials Must Stop appeared first on LewRockwell.

Why the Epstein List Matters

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

I was never much of a conspiracy theorist. Sure, I heard the speculations (we didn’t land on the moon, vaccines cause autism, 9/11 was an inside job, etc.), but I usually just dismissed them with a shake of my head and maybe even a chuckle. I know that evil men can join together to do evil things, but I just didn’t think men were competent enough to pull off the usually elaborate machinations these theories proposed.

Of course, the past five years changed my perspective, and I’m not alone in this shift. It’s not that I see conspiracy theories everywhere; I still firmly accept that we landed on the moon, for example. However, after witnessing the massive gaslighting done by our authorities in order to give them more power and control over our lives, I realized that many conspiracy theories were conspiracy facts.

The lies that accompanied the Covid pandemic were particularly galling, as people were accused of wanting to “kill grandma” just because they didn’t accept obviously false claims about the virus. While I don’t subscribe to some of the most extreme of the conspiracies (I don’t think the Covid vaccine was produced specifically to kill us, for example), I’m now far more open to the reality of high-level conspiracies in our government and other institutions. And like I said, there are many others who joined me in my skepticism of the dominant narrative.

Which brings me to Jeffrey Epstein and his infamous “client list” of rich and powerful child rapists. When Epstein’s case became prominent in 2019 I barely followed it. I suspected he didn’t kill himself, but that wasn’t much of a conspiracy theory—it just seemed obvious that he had information on very powerful people and that at least one of those people didn’t want it made publicly known. It’s not like men haven’t been killed in this type of situation throughout history. But how was this any different from the normal DC corruption that flares up every few years?

Since 2019, however, the story has grown beyond all expectations. A number of major politicians and celebrities have been implicated for allegedly being on the Epstein List, including Prince Andrew and Bill Gates as well as Bill Clinton and Donald Trump. Further, it’s been suggested that Epstein was actually an agent for Israel. Considering the deep connection between America and Israel, and the fact that our connection to Israel has involved us for decades in numerous military conflicts in the Middle East, the idea that we might have blackmailable pedophile government leaders beholden to a foreign government makes this far more than a run-of-the-mill story of political corruption.

During the 2024 presidential campaign Donald Trump tapped into the energy behind those calling for a release of the Epstein List to help propel him to the White House. Multiple times during the campaign Trump said he would release the List. In early September 2024 for instance on the Lex Fridman podcast he stated he’d have “no problem with” releasing the Epstein List. On the October 22, 2024 Theo Vonn podcast, J.D. Vance explicitly said “we need to release the Epstein List.” Before the election, both Kash Patel and Dan Bongino—who became Trump’s FBI Director and Deputy Director, respectively—stated many times that there was an Epstein List being used to manipulate government officials to this day, and he List needed to be released. And of course, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi in February of this year stated that the List “was sitting on my desk right now to review.”

Yet now we are told by Bondi, Patel, and Bongino that there actually is no list and that Epstein definitely committed suicide. Trump has gone even further, attacking a reporter for even asking about Epstein, and then posting a long rambling screed on Truth Social suggesting that the whole Epstein conspiracy theory was something made up by liberals, comparing it to the Russia Hoax. He ended by saying that Epstein was “somebody no one cares about.”

No one cares? I’m sorry, Mr. President, but a lot of Americans care about the possibility of being led by pedophiles and being a puppet of a foreign government. And it’s clear that a lot of people care: in spite of what Trump said, his post actually got “ratio’d,” meaning there was more resistance to what he said than support from his own followers. This was the first time that had happened on his own social media platform.

So what’s going on? Was the whole Epstein case a big nothingburger that got a lot of right-wingers riled up without cause? Or does this mean the Epstein situation is so deeply embedded in our government that Trump and his team are also now beholden to it?

Here’s the truth: I don’t know and you don’t either. But here’s what I suspect: I think either Trump or someone close to him is implicated in the Epstein List, or that someone is implicated who is important to Trump’s goals, and so he decided to try to squash interest in Epstein among his base.

Whether I’m right about his motives or not, Trump miscalculated. While he has historically been masterful in both understanding and manipulating his base, this time it just didn’t work. Too many people associated with Trump (as well as Trump himself) had whipped up the base for years with the promise of releasing the Epstein List—we can’t just drop the subject no matter how much Trump wants that to happen.

It’s important to understand the overall context to see why much of Trump’s base isn’t happy about this ham-handed redirection. In the first few months of the Trump 2.0 presidency, he fulfilled a large number of his promises, and took concrete steps to fulfill many more. His administration was working hard to cut wasteful spending, MAHA was getting off the ground under RFK, Jr., and the appointments of Bondi, Patel, and Bongino seemed to indicate that Trump was serious about draining the swamp.

Yet since May it seems that the direction of the Trump Administration has shifted. Trump fell out with Elon Musk over the “Big Beautiful Bill” which would do little to cut spending; America got directly involved in the military conflict between Israel and Iran after first indicating we wouldn’t; and we sent more weapons to Ukraine after Trump campaigned on pulling support for Ukraine and ending that war. So there was already a growing dissatisfaction among at least some elements of Trump’s base, and his attempt to sweep Epstein under the rug just inflamed those elements more.

Why does all this matter? Let’s return to how we began: the growing acceptance of conspiracy theories. Obviously it’s not good to be lied to and gaslighted by our institutions simply because the truth is superior to a lie, but the constant and bald-faced lies also lead to a total loss of trust in anything someone in authority says. Even when they are telling the truth we suspect they are lying, and a society simply cannot function like this for long. Sadly, the most likely path becomes revolution, which is often violent in nature, and which no Catholic should desire. On the Fourth Sunday after Pentecost on the old calendar, we pray in the Collect,

Grant us, we beseech Thee, O Lord, that the world may be regulated in its course by Thy governance for our peace, and that Thy Church may with tranquil devotion rejoice.

Catholics should always desire peace and tranquility fostered by a stable and just government. As long as our leaders continue to gaslight us, however, we cannot have that, and we will sink deeper into a trustless society in which order and the common good is at risk. I’ve heard some well-meaning people argue that perhaps the Epstein List shouldn’t be released even if it exists because it could break up the country and topple our government. Sadly, the constant lies and corruption of recent years is already putting us on that trajectory. Perhaps a strong dose of radical transparency is just what we need to halt the decline.

Release the Epstein List!

This article was originally published on Crisis Magazine.

The post Why the Epstein List Matters appeared first on LewRockwell.

Interest Groups Are Stronger Than President Trump

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

We are six months into Donald Trump’s presidency, really his first presidency as his previous four years he was staffed by the ruling establishment with his opponents.

Washington taught Trump a lesson, and this time he is staffed with  people who share the values he expressed in his campaign.  

Nevertheless, the Trump administration is now at odds within itself and with a significant percentage of its MAGA supporters, if news reports can be believed.  The issue splitting the Trump forces is the Epstein dossier.  I wrote yesterday about the Epstein Saga.  Clearly there are problems.

But the nature of the problem is being misrepresented.  Attorney General Bondi did not decide on her own that the Epstein file was empty.  She was not protecting Trump. The decision was imposed on the Trump administration by the American Establishment, the Ruling Elite, the Deep State, the Globalists–whatever you want to call those whose money and economic interests rule the governments in the Western World.

The issue our rulers put to President Trump was:  Are you prepared to discredit in the eyes of the American People the ruling establishment and the government of the United States?  If the people lose confidence in their government, how can you accomplish anything?  

Netanyahu was there with Trump to back them up. If you release the Epstein Files it will be revealed that he was a Mossad agent blackmailing your leaders. We, Israel, will release the names, and your country will be ruined.

But it is not only Bondi having difficulties.  It is also Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human services, and Trump himself.

Robert Kennedy has found that despite being a cabinet secretary in the US government, he cannot decide based on hard evidence that the Covid “vaccine” is harmful to everyone.  All RFK could do was to cease the government’s recommendation of the deadly Covid vax for healthy children and pregnant women.  The Secretary of Health and Human Services is powerless to stop the vaccination of the vast majority of the American population with a “vaccine” that kills and destroys the immune system.  Big Pharma is more powerful than the US Secretary for Health.

Kennedy despite his promise was also unable to ban the deadly glyphosate weed killer that has poisoned food, soil, and water. Kennedy announced that this toxic substance was too important to agri-business to be denied them.  Agri-business is more powerful than Secretary Kennedy, and its profits are more important than Americans’ health.

President Trump cannot even impose tariffs or deport immigrant-invaders.  Globalism makes countries dependent on imports.  Manufacturers are harmed by tariffs, and agri-business is harmed by deportations of illegals. These  powerful economic interests are opposed to tariffs and deportations.

Trump’s tariffs are used to lower foreign tariffs against the US or to force concessions from foreign governments.  But as it turned  out the tariffs raise the cost of the remaining American manufacturers and hurt their profits..  They confronted  Trump and were granted exemptions from tariffs for their input needs.  Essentially, the tariff list was naked.  Nothing on it that wasn’t exempted.

The same for deportations. According to news reports, there are to be no deportations of restaurant workers, farm workers, and workers in the chicken slaughter houses. The deportations seem mainly to be limited to criminal gangs.

It has only taken the Ruling Establishment six months to cancel the domestic agenda of the Trump administration.  The Reagan administration lasted longer before it was neutralized.

Trump’s peace agenda has also gone by the wayside.  He has bombed Iran for Netanyahu and continues to support Israeli aggression and Israel’s genocide of Palestine.  Trump is yet to meet with Putin, instead handing the “peace negotiations” over to Zelensky and Putin.  As the war is really between the US and Russia, Zelensky cannot settle it.  The military/security complex needs war or the threat of war for its profits and power. Peace does not serve their interests.

Americans have a false belief in the power of a president. As long as private money determines politics, money, not the people, rules.

The post Interest Groups Are Stronger Than President Trump appeared first on LewRockwell.

The Weaponization of Feminine Charm

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

Beware of pretty faces that you find / A pretty face can hide an evil mind…”
—Johnny Rivers, “Secret Agent Man”

“Nuclear war via missiles scared everybody 70 years ago,” Doug Casey writes. “But today it’s not a practical threat. The likely threats, I think, are from more subtle areas—cyber war, bio war, or a new type of guerrilla war.”

There’s another threat that Casey didn’t mention, one that’s been around since humans began noticing the opposite sex, the import of which was immortalized in Christopher Marlowe’s play, Doctor Faustus.  Marlowe paid tribute to what he considered the ultimate power in the universe, the face that launched a thousand ships: Helen of Troy.  Her kiss was so powerful it sucked the soul from the body of his character, Doctor Faustus.  “Brighter art thou than flaming Jupiter,” Faustus exclaimed, referring to the god of Roman mythology, and more lovely than Arethusa, the “fair maiden” pursued by the river god Alpheus.

Helen and the Trojan War provides the perfect tribute to women’s power and how it will often overtake men in their attempt to think.

Faustus . . . [imagines] himself in the role of Paris, the man who sparked the Trojan War by taking Helen.  He suggests that for the sake of Helen, he would allow his own city, Wittenberg, to be destroyed, just as Troy was.  He fantasizes about fighting Menelaus, Helen’s rightful husband, and even defeating Achilles, the greatest warrior in Greek mythology.

Not every man shares Faustus’s obsession, but Marlowe and the myth underscore an often overlooked point: Women have power over men, many of whom hold key positions and err fatally when they’re the targets of feminine charm.  And what woman wouldn’t feel exultant to have a fleet of warships — or drones — launched solely on her behalf?  It is another of those “subtle threats” that seemingly come from nowhere and are often hidden until they explode.

Religions everywhere have struggled with women’s sexuality and their influence on men, but nothing so far has proven failsafe.  In Christian theology Eve sinned first but Adam was ultimately held responsible. According to Mathew 5:28, “But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart.”  The moral issue is thereby settled: All men are adulterers and therefore sinners, though their religion offers them a means of redemption.

What about women?  Are they branded with sin?  Since there was no Elvis or Brad Pitt in 99 A.D. and thus no heartthrob to arouse women’s passions, the Rulers That Be let women off the hook.

A great power can become a great weapon

We’ve seen cases of unknown women destroying the careers of politically ambitious men, such as Gary Hart and his high-profile affair with Donna Rice in 1987. In Hart’s case it coincidentally put another story out that snatched attention from government’s march to economic ruin.  The damage to the accused varies, but if the missing Jeffrey Epstein list is any indication the fear of exposure is terrifying.  As it should be.  The missing list allegedly named big shots having sex with underage girls at Epstein’s hideaway.  As we’re seeing with Epstein the mere possibility of illicit sexual activity once again keeps the issue alive while distracting the public from problems that actually affect them.  And what remains of government trust after the list appears, then disappears?

There’s another side to women’s power, one that we’ve seen portrayed in movies and literature wherein women sleep with an enemy to achieve a higher-valued goal.

Betty Pack was a real woman working as a spy at MI6 during World War II.

Her clandestine escapades [led] her boss, Sir William Stephenson, [code name Intrepid] to call her unequivocally ‘the greatest unsung heroine of the war.’ Her discovery of the French and Italian naval codes, as well as her work aiding in the decades-long effort to crack the Enigma code, helped the Allies stay a few steps ahead of the Axis powers, and eventually, win the war.

Born in 1910 in Minnesota, Amy Elizabeth “Betty“ Thorpe, whose father was a Marine Corps officer, was sent to the best boarding schools and became well-versed in elite society protocol but “disliked the phoniness of it all.”  At age eleven her charm captured the attention of an Italian diplomat, and at 19, pregnant and unsure who the father was, she eventually secured a wedding with Arthur Pack, “a dapper British diplomatic attaché twice her age.”

During years of an uninspiring marriage to Arthur and the various places his assignments took them, she eventually came in contact with John Shelley, head of British intelligence at the British Embassy in Poland.  Soon Shelley brought her into Her Majesty’s Secret Service.  Her life now had a purpose: Setting honeytraps and gathering intelligence.

During one of her trysts she learned that the Poles had cracked Germany’s fabled Enigma Machine and helped convince Poland to share the findings.

“Alan Turing could not have built his famous computer to crack a later, more complicated version of the Enigma cipher without the assistance of Polish mathematicians.”

Her methods were often daring and ingenious as well as seductive, but she succeeded in acquiring information that gave the British and American military a tactical advantage that changed the course of the war.  When she died from cancer in 1963,

Pack said she had no regrets about combining the two oldest professions in the world – spying and prostitution – and said: ‘Wars are not won by respectable methods’.

The “blonde Bond” as some have called her begs attention to the realities of world affairs and their conflict with the moral imperatives of most religions.

The post The Weaponization of Feminine Charm appeared first on LewRockwell.

One Chart Proves They’re Liars

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

Today’s issue is for old times’ sake.

Fully half of the people who read my emails today started getting them during the Covid years. At that time I was trying my best to understand what was going on, and other people also trying to make sense of things stumbled on my videos and eBooks, thereby landing them on my subscriber list.

So remember the old days, when I’d share a chart that told the opposite of the story the liars were trying to tell us — and no matter how much you showed it to certain people in your life, it made no difference at all and they went on believing fact-free nonsense?

Well, for old times’s sake, I’ve got another one for you, courtesy of Dr. Kevin Bass:

Alongside that chart, which he shared a few days ago, Kevin added this commentary:

Sweden had the loosest COVID-19 restrictions in the developed world.

California had among the harshest.

Sweden’s life expectancy continues to increase to historic highs.

California’s has not recovered.

Lockdowns understandably turned a lot of people against science.

Still, those in the medical and scientific communities won’t apologize.

They put their egos above the public good.

They do not care about public health.

They never did.

They blame Trump and RFK Jr. for destroying trust in public health.

But they were the ones who destroyed trust.

All they care about is power.

And the public sees it.

It should break the hearts of anyone who cares about public health.

Public health is supposed to be about the health of the public.

Not the egos of the experts.

The institutions in this country have been corrupted.

This is a tragedy.

The silver lining of it all:

Now more people than ever understand whom they can trust and whom they cannot.

That is step one in rebuilding.

Never pay for a book again: TomsFreeBooks.com

The post One Chart Proves They’re Liars appeared first on LewRockwell.

The Homeless Man’s Dollar: How Ukraine Aid Exposes Washington’s Broken Priorities

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

[Y]ou’re walking down the street, earning $25,000 a year, barely paying rent, you don’t have any extra money, and you see a homeless person. You feel a lot of sympathy and say, ‘My God, I have to go to the first bank and borrow $1,000 to give to a homeless person.’ No one thinks so. But, in fact, that’s exactly what we’re doing now.

With this, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) delivered one of the most devastating critiques of American foreign policy in a generation. This analogy cut through the fog of Washington’s war rhetoric like a scythe through wheat.

Fiscal insanity is now the hallmark of America’s elite-driven foreign policy. Furthermore, Paul’s analysis exposes the cruel arithmetic of empire: elites mortgage the futures of the nation’s children to fund conflicts that serve neither national interests nor national honor.

This is more than just accounting. It’s a clear indictment of a ruling class that has forsaken the core principle of governance: put your own people first.

On Monday’s War Room, Steve Bannon pointed out that the remnants of the KGB in Russia, the government in Kiev, and America’s foreign policy establishment all want this war to go on. This deserves serious consideration. However, we must resist the urge to blame everything on shadowy “Deep State” conspiracies.

The problem is not hidden puppet masters—it is the visible, arrogant hubris of a foreign policy establishment that has learned nothing from Iraq, nothing from Afghanistan, and nothing from the blood and treasure squandered in a dozen failed secular crusades.

The real conspiracy is conducted in broad daylight: neoconservatives and liberal internationalists who view American power as the world’s policeman, regardless of cost or consequence. These are the same voices who promised quick victory in Iraq and democratic transformation in Afghanistan. They are the heirs of Woodrow Wilson’s messianic vision, not George Washington’s prudent counsel.

Here lies the opportunity for a genuine coalition of the American right. Paleoconservatives, populists, and libertarians share a familiar foe: imperial overstretch.

This coalition understands that “America First” is not isolationism, but rather the oldest and most honored tradition in American foreign policy.

Those who believe in constitutional government, fiscal responsibility, and the simple proposition that American soldiers should not die for abstractions like “global democracy” or “international norms” must come together. Such a coalition will bridge the gap between Rand Paul’s constitutional conservatism and the populist energy that swept Donald Trump into office.

Reflect. The Ukrainian conflict is not about democracy versus authoritarianism—it is about whether America will continue to bleed itself white for the sake of global empire. Every dollar sent to Kiev is a dollar not spent on America’s crumbling infrastructure, its broken borders, or the neglected veterans.

Moral clarity on this issue will unite the right and restore America’s proper role in the world: a republic, not an empire.

The time for diplomatic niceties has passed. America must choose between the wisdom of its founders and the folly of its elites.

This article was originally published on The O’Leary Review.

The post The Homeless Man’s Dollar: How Ukraine Aid Exposes Washington’s Broken Priorities appeared first on LewRockwell.

New CIA Study Documents How Obama’s Team Created the Russiagate Lies

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mer, 16/07/2025 - 05:01

A CIA study was published on July 2nd about the Obama Administration’s accusations that in 2016 Donald Trump’s Presidential campaign had colluded with the Russian Government to swing the 2016 U.S. Presidential election toward a Trump victory, and it reported and presented conclusive evidences that this “Russiagate” narrative had been an Obama Administration hoax, and that its principals (co-authors) were the then-CIA Director John Brennan, the then FBI Director James Comey, and the then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, the three persons who totally excluded, from their falsely (fraudulently) alleged 2016 U.S. ‘Intelligence Community’ study and report (“INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT: Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections”) on the matter, any participation by the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, the intelligence elements of the five DoD services; the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, and Space Force, the Department of State’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, and the other five U.S. intelligence agencies of the 18-member U.S. Intelligence Community. These three intelligence chiefs — CIA, FBI, and DNI — produced that fake ‘Intelligence Community Assessment’, by including in it ‘evidences’ (such as the infamous “Steele dossier”) and by excluding from it the numerous solid and irrefutaby authentic evidences.

This new analysis, by the current CIA team that was headed by the Trump-appointed CIA Director John Ratcliffe, had been completed in May this year but had not been reported to the public until Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post did so on July 2nd, in a superb exclusive report by Miranda Devine, which included in the online version (which isn’t paywalled) the actual Ratcliffe-headed study. This CIA study is absolutely devastating against Obama — just as the New York Post’s earlier and likewise exclusive and extensively documented online report about the Biden family’s international bribery-and-influence-peddling ring (and Hunter Biden’s laptop) had been, which was further documented by Republican hearings in the House and Senate. (The Biden Administration prosecuted Hunter Biden on illegal firearms-possession and tax-evasion but not on the bribery-conspiracy, which would have implicated his father, who then pardoned Hunter in order to prevent any possible future prosecution of himself.)

Devine’s July 2nd news-report was titled “Obama’s Trump-Russia collusion report was corrupt from start: CIA review”.

On 7 August 2020, I had already headlined “‘Russiagate’ Hoax Unravels, but Their Anti-Russia Sanctions Don’t.” and presented a comprehensive news-report on the demonstrable falsity, even at that time, of the Obama Administration’s allegations against both Trump and Russia’s Government.

As I had made clear there, not only was the Obama-Administration’s “Russiagate” accusation against Trump fraudulent, but ALSO their allegation against Russia was fraudulent. This fact — that the accusations against Russia were likewise fraudulent —was hidden, not reported, by Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post, and by the Republican congressional investigations into Russiagate — they were ONLY to exonerate Trump. (Consequently, those Republican propaganda-operations — the N.Y. Post and the Republican congressional investigations — IGNORED the most-incriminating evidences against the Biden-family influence-peddling ring, which concerned Biden’s forcing Ukraine to fire the actually HONEST Ukrainian investigator into Hunter Biden’s influence-peddling to protect Ukraine’s Burisma gas corporation, whose owner had placed Hunter onto his board in order to get that investigator fired — as the then-V.P. Joe Biden subsequently did force Ukraine’s government to do. That corruptness was ignored, and Republicans focused instead on the Bidens and China, etc., not on their corruptness with an ‘ally’ such as Ukraine.)

In fact, even earlier, already on 16 July 2017, I had headlined “Russiagate Exposed: It’s a Fraud” and reported:

It has now been incontrovertibly proven that the time-stamps and other data in the Democratic National Committee (DNC) files that were leaked to Wikileaks are consistent with those files having been leaked by a person who was inside the DNC and not by an external hacker as has been presumed by all of the ‘news’-reports that this was a ‘hack’ …

So, even that early, it was already clear, incontrovertible, that the ‘Russiagate’ narrative was based upon lies by the Obama Administration, initially to weaken the Trump camaign, but afterwards to smear both Trump and Putin so as to make politically virtually impossible for Trump as President to do anyting to reduce American aggression against Russia.

Furthermore, the Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russiagate investigation found nothing to prosecute against Trump on conspiracy with Russia, but falsely alleged that Russia’s Government had tried to throw the 2016 U.S. Presidential election to Trump, and Mueller also alleged that Trump might have obstructed justice (and Mueller indicated that he hoped that if Biden would win in 2020, then President Biden would prosecute Trump for that, which Biden declined to do). Mueller’s entire career in the U.S. Government had been devoted to framing innocents in order to protect the guilty.

In domestic U.S. politics, America’s Government and media presented these matters as being Democrats versus Republicans; but, in international affairs, America’s media bipartisanly presented these matters to the public as being America versus Russia, so as to boost sales of U.S.-made weapons etc. (to ‘defend America and other democracies against Russia’). It’s all a sales-promotion campaign for those weapons-makers, regardless which of the two billionaires-controlled Parties happens to be in power at the time. They constantly lie to impose their (billionaires’) dictatorship.

On June 6th, I proposed what I believe is the only possible way that such corrupt control (by billionaires) of an alleged democracy can be prevented. Thus far, nobody takes (nor even considers) it seriously. I welcome feedback on my proposal, and can be contacted about it here.

This article was originally published on Eric’s Substack.

The post New CIA Study Documents How Obama’s Team Created the Russiagate Lies appeared first on LewRockwell.

America’s Untold Stories – JFK Assassination: The Ultimate Interview Marathon

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mar, 15/07/2025 - 19:06

Join America’s Untold Stories for an unprecedented 3.5-hour deep dive into the JFK assassination, filmed live from Dallas. Mark Groubert and Eric Hunley bring you extended interviews with the top minds in JFK research, including Matt Douthit, Rob Morrow, Cyril Wecht, Phillip F. Nelson, Paul Bleau, Jim DiEugenio, and Max Good.

This marathon episode covers everything from autopsy anomalies and Oswald’s background to CIA cover-ups and deep state involvement. Whether you’re a seasoned researcher or a curious citizen, this is the one JFK special you can’t miss.

Watch it all. Decide for yourself.

*****************************************
Join us November 21st–23rd, 2025 in Dallas at JFK Lancer Conference (or Virtually)

Tickets now available at https://assassinationconference.com/
Virtual tickets start at $75.99
In-person tickets start at $149.99

Discount Code: Use UNTOLD10 at checkout for 10% off
*****************************************

The post America’s Untold Stories – JFK Assassination: The Ultimate Interview Marathon appeared first on LewRockwell.

Response to the standard 4th of July message

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mar, 15/07/2025 - 18:16

Jim Fedako wrote:

Lew – 

A Christian brother sent out the standard July 4th message. My response:

More David Barton history.

How about this history, from other founding documents:

1. Whereas the several states are founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law …

2. In the name of God, source of all reason and justice, the several states …

3. Whereas the people of the several states profess their full belief in Jesus Christ, Our Lord …

Oh, wait, the first is the preamble to a section of the Canadian constitution, the second from the preamble to the Argentina constitution, and the third from Malta (substitute “the several states” with the respective country name).

Yet, you quoted the Declaration that was arguing for the separation of the colonies from England. It is not the document that founded the United States. That would be the Constitution — a document that does not mention God. And our government officially declared early on that the US is not a Christian nation.

Instead of invoking the names of God and Jesus Christ, the writers of our Declaration went with the then-woke, politically correct “Nature’s God.” Are you OK with that reference as a sign of faithfulness to the one and only God? Especially given the examples above, with other examples not listed.

Now, given the preambles listed above, what makes US the one true city on the hill?

I suggest you read more history than that which is taught in public schools or emanates from court historians. You might discover the writers and signers of the Declaration and Constitution were just political men. And, in the case of the Declaration, were making a political argument and not really establishing a Christian nation. Or even a proposition nation.

And that is OK. They do not need to be made saints … unless you need to justify neoconism as your religion.

 

The post Response to the standard 4th of July message appeared first on LewRockwell.

“The Hump” WWII’s Deadly Air Cargo Route

Lew Rockwell Institute - Mar, 15/07/2025 - 18:03

Tim McGraw wrote:

This is crazy. To lose over one aircraft a day with crew for years is nuts. One thousand seven hundred crewmen died in this operation. Six hundred aircraft, or more, were lost in the mountains and jungles. Airplanes and pilots take a long time to replace on the other side of the world. It was also crazy to fly 24/7, no matter what the weather conditions. 

President Roosevelt (FDR) called Chinese General Chiang Kai-shek “Cash My Check”. Madame Chiang was the Dragon Lady. Seeing her in Congress begging for more war supplies reminds me of Netanyahu and Zelensky in Congress recently. Nothing really changes.

Wars are insane. As an aircraft mechanic, I know how much work it takes to build a plane, maintain it, and keep it airworthy. It amazes me that the planes fly as well as they do. To have people trying to shoot each other out of the sky is nuts.

The post “The Hump” WWII’s Deadly Air Cargo Route appeared first on LewRockwell.

Condividi contenuti